From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 28 23:43:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534C337B401 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from topaz.ad1810.com (topaz.ad1810.com [212.204.230.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0B343FA3 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:43:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from k7.mavetju (topaz.ad1810.com [212.204.230.141]) by topaz.ad1810.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F802B9F8; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 08:42:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C20716A7101; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:42:56 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:42:56 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Christian Kratzer Message-ID: <20030429064256.GK601@k7.mavetju> References: <200304290622.h3T6MKsN081468@freefall.freebsd.org> <20030429082421.U54846@majakka.cksoft.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030429082421.U54846@majakka.cksoft.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/51277: [maintainer update] openldap21, user and group for ldap, sasl support X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 06:43:01 -0000 On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 08:29:23AM +0200, Christian Kratzer wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > > Synopsis: [maintainer update] openldap21, user and group for ldap, sasl support > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > > State-Changed-By: edwin > > State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 28 23:21:13 PDT 2003 > > State-Changed-Why: > > It all works nicely, but with it cyrus-sasl is depending on openldap > > en openldap is depending on cyrus-sasl. And I don't know how to fix > > this circulair dependency. > > Yes there is a potential for cyclic dependency here. Currently there is no > fix apart from only building the one with the other.w Euh yes, but if I do a make install I get a zillion make-processes which are trying to resolve the issue on who came first, the chicken or the egg. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/weblog.php