Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Jan 2016 20:10:36 -0500
From:      Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org>
To:        NGie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Steven Hartland <steven@multiplay.co.uk>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r293724 - in head/sys/boot: arm64/libarm64 common efi/boot1 efi/fdt efi/include efi/include/arm64 efi/libefi efi/loader efi/loader/arch/amd64 efi/loader/arch/arm efi/loader/arch/arm64 i...
Message-ID:  <5695A40C.6050306@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAGHfRMB9b5FCDmYZFJv8W7ChZmvNddYCKYjiObUk3P4JHr6GAw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201601120217.u0C2HdBC089684@repo.freebsd.org> <1452645668.46848.34.camel@freebsd.org> <56959DA7.9050206@freebsd.org> <1452646442.46848.37.camel@freebsd.org> <CAGHfRMB9b5FCDmYZFJv8W7ChZmvNddYCKYjiObUk3P4JHr6GAw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2016-01-12 20:05, NGie Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote:
> ...
>> For several reasons.  The fact that gcc isn't the default compiler
>> doesn't mean that it's okay for code to not compile with gcc; it's
>> still a supported compiler for arm.
>
> Agreed. It also makes things messier when MFCing changes if it doesn't
> work with gcc.
> Thanks,
> -NGie
>

If it is a supported compiler, maybe we need a tinderbox option that 
compiles ARM with gcc, to catch cases like this.

-- 
Allan Jude



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5695A40C.6050306>