Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:15:06 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] More meaningful information about ENOEXEC for kldload(8) Message-ID: <4CC5F35A.7090809@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <ia4pjg$650$1@dough.gmane.org> References: <4CC5D83E.8030505@delphij.net> <4CC5D9DB.1020409@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTindYRwpmA=En%2BpYyHVcUkmQ0wsZrB7Y-f2E=vK=@mail.gmail.com> <ia4pjg$650$1@dough.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/25/2010 13:33, Ivan Voras wrote: > (except if the message is changed to say "please look at the kernel > syslog messages to find out the real reason for this failure") Thinking about Garrett's response as well, this may be the best way to go. At this point I'm also not concerned about waiting for an ideal solution. IMO an incremental change here would be most welcome. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CC5F35A.7090809>