Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 17:08:58 -0400 From: James Housley <jim@thehousleys.net> To: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> Cc: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.ORG>, Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Y2K links Message-ID: <394FDD6A.AC1CAD90@thehousleys.net> References: <20000620160241.C32776@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <20000620151125.O6284@FreeBSD.org> <394FD415.ECF2D1DB@thehousleys.net> <20000620230333.A16966@cichlids.cichlids.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Langer wrote: > > Thus spake James Housley (jim@thehousleys.net): > > > Actually Y2038 or Y2070 would be better. > > What's up with 2070? > > Only because it's 100 years after the epoch? A lot of the early Y2K software made assumptions about 2-digit dates. date<70 being 20xx and greater than 70 being 19xx. That is all. Jim -- Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?394FDD6A.AC1CAD90>