Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 Oct 2001 20:31:19 -0500
From:      David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>
To:        "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@ECE.CMU.EDU>
Cc:        Allen Landsidel <all@biosys.net>, Kal Torak <kaltorak@quake.com.au>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: ICQ with NAT problems 
Message-ID:  <200110220131.f9M1VJw44179@grumpy.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: Message from "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@ECE.CMU.EDU>  of "Sun, 21 Oct 2001 20:52:51 EDT." <109960000.1003711970@vpn46.ece.cmu.edu> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" writes:
> On Sunday, October 21, 2001 19:47:57 -0500, David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net> 
> wrote:
> +-----
> | What am I missing about the problem that the punch_fw option in natd is
> | not supposed to deal with? Is my understanding ICQ is only a particular
> | implementation of IRC?
> +--->8
> 
> Er, no; while it has a similar purpose, the protocol is completely 
> different and I would be surprised if punch_fw worked with it.

OK, my ignorance was showing.

If its all that common/popular then it might be a candidate for 
enhancing libalias and therefore natd.

-- 
David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net
=====================================================================
The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its
capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110220131.f9M1VJw44179>