Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:38:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Tuomo Valkonen <tuomov@iki.fi> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ion3 removal Message-ID: <slrnfm2kg5.8cq.tuomov@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi> References: <20071213024946.GA4959@soaustin.net> <200712130923.24488@aldan> <20071213143306.GA27297@soaustin.net> <200712131030.44931@aldan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2007-12-13, Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> wrote: > The Xinerama can be among the > OPTIONS (default off) thus respecting the requirement, that modifications be > only on user's request. It's ok that it's an ion-specific option that is clearly documented to add an unsupported feature. However, as I have stated, it would be cleaner and maybe even more discoverable for the module to be a separate package. (There are other extra modules as well: mod_xrandr and mod_ionflux.) -- Tuomo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnfm2kg5.8cq.tuomov>