Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 01:24:52 +0200 From: "Svein Halvor Halvorsen" <svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc> To: "Jonathan Herriott" <herriojr@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Nicolas Blais <nb_root@videotron.ca> Subject: Re: pow function working unexpectedly Message-ID: <bbe90d1d0604111624u67d4a5eal65cfd62b4b8e3b0b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6a56d69c0604111607l5fba5939pfc6461a99a2ceab3@mail.gmail.com> References: <6a56d69c0604111554o587ce2c5ha1ff4ea20bbab0a4@mail.gmail.com> <200604111857.43171.nb_root@videotron.ca> <6a56d69c0604111607l5fba5939pfc6461a99a2ceab3@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/12/06, Jonathan Herriott <herriojr@gmail.com> wrote: > Question then. Why would it work when I don't use variables if I > don't include the library? This question is just out of curiosity. Since you use only hard coded operands, the result is given, and gcc optimizes such arithmetics and function calls away. Svein Halvor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bbe90d1d0604111624u67d4a5eal65cfd62b4b8e3b0b>