From owner-freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org Thu Aug 18 02:30:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chromium@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13616BBE7F6 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 02:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from clutton@zoho.com) Received: from sender153-mail.zoho.com (sender153-mail.zoho.com [74.201.84.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD5391F72 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 02:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from clutton@zoho.com) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=zapps768; d=zoho.com; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:content-type:mime-version; b=G//zEtGvZAp0huZN7dPyfUoIfZLQRVOFbw/YrR0vUWUNL+FmIFex+Qc3B0aehrGep+cwqbDi9TV3 cT8zQh/qUn4NYIuEeA012uE/lIrsV5qni0O5Cngi2Ds+KMYF9UWE Received: from [192.168.11.5] (mktechs.net [46.229.54.117]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1471487395837538.4432955657803; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1471487392.7533.22.camel@zoho.com> Subject: Re: 52.0.2743.82 (64-bit) to go, Aw snap fixed as well. From: clutton To: freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 05:29:52 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1471486169.7533.8.camel@zoho.com> References: <1471486169.7533.8.camel@zoho.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vkKmFrrU/eWWeAaf/bmX" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 1 X-ZohoMail: Z_30320720 SPT_1 SLF_E X-BeenThere: freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Chromium issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 02:30:03 -0000 --=-vkKmFrrU/eWWeAaf/bmX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 05:09 +0300, clutton wrote: > I've just fixed the Aw, snap. I believe so. >=20 > The patch is going to be huge, not because of this simple bug. New > version was ported as well with some extra things. I need few more > days > to polish everything and create patches for some things that are to > ugly now. And probably few days more to be sure that it works > everywhere 9, 10, HEAD. The current porting was done on HEAD. I see. 52 was already ported. I actually asked on this maillist, If anyone working on this? It's bad when the same work done twice. =46rom my liaskos/freebsd-chromium reply::: Oh, I did my own porting as well. My first working version were done a week ago but real fixing 'Aw, snap' were done just now. Such a pity that we both did the work. I spend endless time with lldb. I also ported tools/gn/bootstrap and a lot of other stuff were polished. --=-vkKmFrrU/eWWeAaf/bmX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJXtR2gAAoJEH2wP42yyP6QKAAP/0HpIz/gm1wcAKAec01X6osG OVjyr76nZuhEbFPU/NmkZfndL36wlhluqIRjaYkmSeLHLfXoraySV3XovPbaB9TD p+OHWtNxVk9iHKC0dzrqMaJUNEyDVsgUX5PeTVSDlkbv5hAsTJj4IfZjC/ldSPau QPh15B5FYXur3S4WQocGWJereS7fl9mpaz7n9w6Bhklehy45qMovIM2INlg/FNo8 WNhtrJbUYA7N2vyJjpfcJ+tBNNqQ9zjpk/z3mtN8yli/CbkXnvYJ2XoLCms2vLW0 AGyHRj2B/yamb5C9bIzB7w96eWtcr/cVftjxnhMaI7knXoavGYE10GXYxzB7IklZ yt4kMIkmfHFffBy4MFZJ6ssIH2V378g5/JzO7bZAFnQxZ431eqwsxxca/ViTnwn+ xYwOOl5uTy+vjhDHvOH6TANnGIsIRWv7O7vtEsr3TZlfQ6gPr9vI2GRoStpw/fuL 1sendT42VzLiQM686xrR1d0Kex8FC+WsJF3gh20laznrOohaAf2zpn3ajVVhEEJx HbyO5zO2CJiAEZtlaXbV7gHBK7MCa62ihJO9Fi8RDN6iNOBpKM8yhP4HscnRvsBd QauhEqoCd6aomlAXwmW4hrResi0aXWi5zfrOw2XgycSKGvWWWGj9+BqGfHjNQsSE XmspVOnx77CMbwR8BtBb =YJDK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vkKmFrrU/eWWeAaf/bmX--