Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:49:47 +0000
From:      David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r262282 - in head: contrib/dma contrib/dma/debian contrib/dma/debian/migrate contrib/dma/debian/source contrib/dma/test etc/mtree libexec libexec/dma share/mk tools/build/mk tools/build...
Message-ID:  <C71FDED4-CB40-45BC-BA97-4FB0BCB2CCB8@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140225075220.GF83610@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
References:  <201402210726.s1L7QnBP007144@svn.freebsd.org> <20140222082350.GA2705@server.rulingia.com> <20140222121438.GO1699@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20140225062222.GB2705@server.rulingia.com> <20140225075220.GF83610@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 Feb 2014, at 07:52, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 05:22:22PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> On 2014-Feb-22 13:14:38 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> =
wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 07:23:50PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>>> I'd also query the reason for including Debian-specific code in the
>>>> FreeBSD base.
>>=20
>>> Where have you seen debian specific code?
>>=20
>> /usr/src/contrib/dma/debian - as far as I can tell, this directory is
>> Debion specific.  I thought we stripped out irrelevant code from =
third
>> party imports but looking wider, there is similarly irrelevant code =
in
>> a variety of other contrib imports.  I'll withdraw that objection.
>>=20
>> --=20
>> Peter Jeremy
>=20
> Have you already looked at how contrib works? who cares FYI you can =
also find
> some win32 specific code in there, debian packaging code, rpm spec =
files etc.

For the libc++ imports, we strip out the support directory, which =
contains Solaris and Win32-specific stuff.  If we end up with a =
support/freebsd, then we'll bring that in, but not support/solaris and =
support/win32.  That stuff is in the vendor branch, but it just seems =
polite not to make people who check out head get files that are never =
used when building FreeBSD in any configuration.

David




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C71FDED4-CB40-45BC-BA97-4FB0BCB2CCB8>