From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 22 00:38:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8A316A426 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:38:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [204.156.12.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D5843D5E for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:38:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A7F46B06; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:38:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 01:38:40 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Karl Denninger In-Reply-To: <20050722001253.GA70277@FS.denninger.net> Message-ID: <20050722013605.U16902@fledge.watson.org> References: <200507211803.j6LI34dV005050@ferens.net> <20050721194500.W9208@fledge.watson.org> <20050721192613.GA61902@FS.denninger.net> <6.2.1.2.0.20050721153750.0851fab0@64.7.153.2> <20050721202234.GA62615@FS.denninger.net> <20050722004340.H16902@fledge.watson.org> <20050722001253.GA70277@FS.denninger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quality of FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:38:20 -0000 On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Karl Denninger wrote: > If Soren BELIEVES (2) is the case, I'll test against -BETA1, IF I can > have confirmation that -BETA1 has the ATA-NG code in it. > > Its trivially easy for me to reproduce this problem on my sandbox > machine. As has already been stated, Soren's changes are in 6.x. If you are able to test this workload against 6.0-BETA1 using the hardware in question, that would be very helpful. Depending on the nature of the workload and problem, you might find you need to compile out the debugging features, as they slow things down quite a bit, so might reduce the transaction rate sufficiently to make the problem fail to occur. If it requires 5.x applications, you might find you have to wait for BETA2. Robert N M Watson