From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 00:03:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13C01065670 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:03:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F818FC15 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBFBA7.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.251.167]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q1Q03TrG094075; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:03:30 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q1Q03Iaw080906; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:03:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1Q035OW083472; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:03:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201202260003.q1Q035OW083472@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Artifex Maximus From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Sat, 25 Feb 2012 07:33:39 +0100." Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:03:05 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: clang vs gcc linking problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:03:32 -0000 Artifex Maximus wrote: > Hello! > > Absolutely not a flame war but would like to switch to clang in a > project. Project uses ncurses. gcc works well but the executable fails > when compiled other than -O0. Then I think I should change to clang > which will becomes the default compiler in FreeBSD. With clang at > linking time I got the following error: > > /usr/local/bin/ld: display/libsub_display.a(canvas.o): undefined > reference to symbol 'keypad' > /usr/local/bin/ld: note: 'keypad' is defined in DSO > /usr/local/lib/libtinfow.so.6.0 so try adding it to the linker command > line > /usr/local/lib/libtinfow.so.6.0: could not read symbols: Invalid operation > clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) > *** Error code 1 > > With exactly the same flags gcc links successful. Any idea where is > the problem and what is the solution? > > Thanks, There have been quite a number of discussions on Gcc & Clang of various lists since efforts to transition started, I don't see a specific list here, http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo but this may interest http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 00:13:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4650A106566B for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:13:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76008FC0A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326075C28 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:27:15 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE6FB5C22 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:27:14 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F497814.9000704@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:08:52 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120225231409.fdd67bff.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120225231409.fdd67bff.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:13:48 -0000 On 02/26/12 08:14, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 23:07:36 +0100, C. P. Ghost wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Polytropon wrote: >>> I have a problem installing a Samsung CLX-2160 color >>> laser printer using CUPS. In the http://localhost:631 >>> web-based configuration, none of the methods that are >>> supposed to be used for installing a printer works. >> (... snip ...) >> >>> What am I doing wrong? :-) >> Have you heeded *all* the advices here? >> /usr/ports/print/cups-base/pkg-message >> >> Permissions are usually the culprit when CUPS doesn't work. > Done (even with the variation of 0660 vs. 0770 as suggested > in that file): > > [system=10] > add path 'unlpt*' mode 0660 group cups > add path 'ulpt*' mode 0660 group cups > add path 'lpt*' mode 0660 group cups > add path 'usb/4.2.*' mode 0660 group cups > add path 'usb*' mode 0770 group cups > > Same result == no result. :-) I don't know that I can add anything to the cups discussion here, but I understand you'd rather use lpr anyway. You are aware that the printer will only speak splix the samsung universal driver language? So any config would have to be based on that. Once you have that working maybe you can manually add the printer in cups using lpd. JIC you haven't considered this yet... HIH :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 01:42:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1210106566C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:42:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jherman@dichotomia.fr) Received: from mail.dichotomia.fr (hydrogen.dichotomia.net [91.121.82.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D39B8FC17 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:42:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.11] (unknown [109.190.13.180]) (Authenticated sender: kha@dichotomia.fr) by sslmail.dichotomia.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBD003DD07C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:41:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F498DF0.5070504@dichotomia.fr> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:42:08 +0100 From: Jerome Herman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (sslmail.dichotomia.fr); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:41:44 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:42:13 -0000 On 25/02/2012 22:14, Polytropon wrote: > I have a problem installing a Samsung CLX-2160 color > laser printer using CUPS. In the http://localhost:631 > web-based configuration, none of the methods that are > supposed to be used for installing a printer works. > > The "Add Printer" button leads to this: > > > > Add Printer > ----------- > Local Printers: > Discovered Network Printers: > Other Network Printers: o Internet Printing Protocol (http) > o Internet Printing Protocol (ipp) > o LPD/LPR Host or Printer > o AppSocket/HP JetDirect > [ Continue ] > > No local printers can be selected (even though the > printer is connected, switched on and woken up). > > > > And "Find New Printers" shows this: > > > > Available Printers > ------------------ > No printers found. > > > > Excellent auto detection. :-) > > > > The corresponding device for the printer is this: > > ulpt0: class 0/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2> on usbus4 > ulpt0: using bi-directional mode > > ugen4.2: > at usbus4, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON > > crw-rw---- 1 root cups 0, 142 Feb 25 21:42 /dev/ulpt0 > > I have installed all packages I can imagine: > > cups-1.4.6 > cups-base-1.4.6_6 > cups-client-1.4.6 > cups-image-1.4.6 > cups-pstoraster-8.15.4_6 > gutenprint-cups-5.2.4_2 > foo2zjs-20110609 > foomatic-db-20090530_2 > foomatic-db-engine-4.0.7,2 > gutenprint-foomatic-5.2.4_2 > foo2zjs-20110609 > > I also have the CLX-216xsplc.ppd PPD file available > which I think I'd like to hand over to CUPS somewhere. > > ALTERNATIVE: If someone could explain how it's easier > to make a lpr filter (for the system's printer service), > I'd also appreciate this. > > I've already tried this: > > # foo2xqx-wrapper cupstest.ps> cupstest.xqx > # cat cupstest.xqx> /dev/ulpt0 > > It causes the LED of the printer to blink, but nothing is > printed, even though the printer startes to make sounds > (involving the print mechanism, but not the sheet feeder). > > If I use > > # foo2qpdl-wrapper cupstest.ps> cupstest.xqx > # cat cupstest.xqx> /dev/ulpt0 > > the CUPS test page is printed, but not in color (only b/w). > After looking into the manpage, > > # foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c cupstest.ps> cupstest.xqx > # cat cupstest.xqx> /dev/ulpt0 > > makes the printer print properly. > > Okay, it works. > > How am I supposed to use a PPD file with CUPS when no > local printer is shown? > > I "need" CUPS (or at least my programs seem to think > that), how should it be done? > > Okay, I could make a simple printer filter. I could then > integrate that with /etc/printcap (as I do with my PCL > HP Laserjet 4000d). I think it should be possible to code > that similar to a parallel printer (with ulpt instead > of lpt device specification for the lp= parameter... > > What am I doing wrong? :-) You did nothing wrong, on the contrary. You now have a prefectly working printer. You just need to tell cups it exists. Since # foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c cupstest.ps> cupstest.xqx # cat cupstest.xqx> /dev/ulpt0 works, you should be able to create a new printer using a direct device. So go on as if you wanted to create a network printer, choose HPJetDirect (for example) when asked about the connection. Then when you have to input the uri remove the socket:// and type usb:///dev/ulpt0. (Yes triple / before dev) The you can process as usual for name, options and PPD. If it doesn't work try parallel:///dev/ulpt0 Normally one should work. Basically in cups choosing "network connection" allows you to input any URI you want, including file and raw (now defunct I think - it was mainly for debug anyway). I never tried this specific printer, but this trick worked well on a few HP and Canon. Tell us how it went. Jerome Herman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 04:09:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886C11065674 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 04:09:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D65F8FC14 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 04:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q1Q49Eo8030029; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 21:09:16 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:09:13 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.3-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201202241432.29069.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202261109.13748.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Cc: "C. P. Ghost" Subject: Re: Why is this Symbol in the front of your website. A humble request. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 04:09:19 -0000 Hi, On Sunday 26 February 2012 03:26:48 C. P. Ghost wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Erich Dollansky > wrote: > > On Friday 24 February 2012 14:14:32 Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> On 24/02/2012 06:59, Erich Dollansky wrote: > >> > I live in Asia and they really have these things here. Just without the horns. > >> > >> That would be what most people call a "ball." They have them in the > >> west too... > > > > do they vibrate when they get moved? > > Yes, but only if they run FreeBSD, and only if they have the > hw.balls.vibrating sysctl(8) set to 1. always these complicated things. This is why life here is so much more exiting. We do not need sysctl. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 06:58:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA76106566B for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:58:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email2.allantgroup.com (email2.emsphone.com [199.67.51.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4252D8FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email2.allantgroup.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1Q6wPCq077595 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:58:26 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1Q6wPYT002349 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:58:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q1Q6wPxA002348; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:58:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:58:25 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: kpneal@pobox.com Message-ID: <20120226065824.GE59682@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20120226053817.GA19203@neutralgood.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120226053817.GA19203@neutralgood.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at email2.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (email2.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:58:26 -0600 (CST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 199.67.51.78 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mapping back gptid -> device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:58:28 -0000 In the last episode (Feb 26), kpneal@pobox.com said: > If I have this: > > [root@gunsight1 /etc]# ls -la /dev/gptid/ > total 1 > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Feb 1 12:44 . > dr-xr-xr-x 9 root wheel 512 Feb 1 12:44 .. > crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 118 Feb 1 12:44 7050cab7-4add-11e1-8919-d4bed9aca1e9 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 122 Feb 1 12:44 d78fd637-4a40-11e1-ab9b-d4bed9aca1e9 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 106 Feb 1 12:44 e1ec4071-4cfb-11e1-b4ca-d4bed9aca1e9 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 112 Feb 1 12:44 f96b3a2c-4cfb-11e1-b4ca-d4bed9aca1e9 > [root@gunsight1 /etc]# > > How do I determine which of those /gptid/ entries corresponds to which > listed in kernel messages printed at boot. > > I have tried "gpart show -r", but it doesn't give the gptid of the entire > drive -- only the partitions: > > => 34 877920189 mfid0 GPT (419G) > 34 256 1 83bd6b9d-7f41-11dc-be0b-001560b84f0f (128K) > 290 44041950 2 516e7cb5-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b (21G) > 44042240 817889280 3 516e7cba-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b (390G) > 861931520 15988703 - free - (7.6G) Try "gpart list" instead, and look at the "rawuuid" field. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 07:20:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0BD106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:20:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913018FC0C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (c80-217-70-175.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.70.175]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q1Q7KbaS098343; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:20:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:20:14 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bender, Chris" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:20:44 -0000 2012-02-26 00:54, Bender, Chris skrev: > Hi Brent > > Yes the system we are calling X, is jailed by another system. > > Here is the jailer system: > > zs1# netstat -aptcp | grep smtp > tcp4 0 0 tools2.smtp 10.156.31.20.45081 > SYN_RCVD > tcp4 0 0 tools2.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 rt3.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 npims.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 wiki.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 localhost.smtp *.* LISTEN Here is about jails; http://www.uk.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html Have you tried to telnet into the other jailed hostnames and ip-addresses, like telnet rt3.* 25 What does it say? Can you connect? There seems to be either a jail problem or a routing problem You can look at your routing table with netstat -r From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 08:22:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91892106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:22:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c_longfoot@hotmail.com) Received: from snt0-omc4-s44.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc4-s44.snt0.hotmail.com [65.54.51.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A818FC15 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT121-W54 ([65.55.90.200]) by snt0-omc4-s44.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:10:16 -0800 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [77.3.154.63] From: Carolyn Longfoot To: Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:10:16 +0000 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2012 08:10:16.0060 (UTC) FILETIME=[12740BC0:01CCF45E] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Custom Kernel Target Ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:22:22 -0000 When I start cd /usr/src make buildkernel KERNELCONF=3DMYKERNEL then the process start and gives -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sat Feb 25 10:59:25 EST 2012 -------------------------------------------------------------- Even though my config file has ident MYKERNEL I checked and there are no rogue versions of MYKERNEL (like a straight copy= from GENERIC) and it exists in /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf I'm probably missing something really simple here=2C why would 'make' go fo= r GENERIC instead of my custom config? This is 9.0 RELEASE. Thanks=2C Caro = From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 08:27:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E76E106566C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:27:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80B88FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B065C28 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:41:06 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AFFB5C22 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:41:06 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F49EBD3.7070805@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:22:43 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Custom Kernel Target Ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:27:39 -0000 On 02/26/12 18:10, Carolyn Longfoot wrote: > > When I start > cd /usr/src > make buildkernel KERNELCONF=MYKERNEL > > then the process start and gives > -------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sat Feb 25 10:59:25 EST 2012 > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Even though my config file has > ident MYKERNEL > > I checked and there are no rogue versions of MYKERNEL (like a straight copy from GENERIC) and it exists in > /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf > > I'm probably missing something really simple here, why would 'make' go for GENERIC instead of my custom config? > This is 9.0 RELEASE. Try `make KERNCONF=MYKERNEL buildkernel` From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 09:26:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75842106566B for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBDD8FC0C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q1Q9PrL0005428; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:26:02 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:25:51 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.3-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202261625.51082.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Cc: Carolyn Longfoot Subject: Re: Custom Kernel Target Ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:26:10 -0000 Hi, On Sunday 26 February 2012 15:10:16 Carolyn Longfoot wrote: > > When I start > cd /usr/src > make buildkernel KERNELCONF=MYKERNEL > > then the process start and gives > -------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sat Feb 25 10:59:25 EST 2012 I do not know where the word GENERIC is taken from. Maybe from you configuration file? > Even though my config file has > ident MYKERNEL > Ok, excluded then. > I checked and there are no rogue versions of MYKERNEL (like a straight copy from GENERIC) and it exists in > /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf > > I'm probably missing something really simple here, why would 'make' go for GENERIC instead of my custom config? > This is 9.0 RELEASE. > make buildkernel KERNCONF=AsusAMD620 is what I do. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 09:41:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD67E106566C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:41:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidianwalker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961988FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:41:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaeo4 with SMTP id o4so6442995iae.13 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:41:02 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of davidianwalker@gmail.com designates 10.50.155.202 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.50.155.202; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of davidianwalker@gmail.com designates 10.50.155.202 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=davidianwalker@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=davidianwalker@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.50.155.202]) by 10.50.155.202 with SMTP id vy10mr11564514igb.8.1330249262171 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:41:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dx25eTof4D8UsQ0WaDqhOwj4nGfCrl81K2RYxNL+sSo=; b=x9aKr43LCtuDhNOwqCR/a4LwiClb9YEfx4w47dp/JO4bSFn6ccr90oR3BYWi40RjJY nITcSxYbek9JHBUPC7Ok67jcidcD+JLcrSBpEB+V0CZeh8NqU/tFaQ+8gO/S3lLOmYo+ int+2Cc16bUGwAhVKnrEaeTWz2Uz0uJKnXDpY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.155.202 with SMTP id vy10mr9253923igb.8.1330247620115; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:13:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.85.133 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:13:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:43:40 +1030 Message-ID: From: David Walker To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: kern/94369: [bktr] [patch] Patch to support Leadtek WinFast Tv2000 XP bktr card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:41:02 -0000 Hi. I have one of these cards. I notice the PR is open - does this mean the patch was not committed? Is there anything I can do to get eyeballs on this? I've never compiled from source or applied a diff but if it needs testng and someone's willing to give me a basic outline of the procedure I'll see if I can avago. Learning this stuff is on my todo list for this decade but time is short. Best wishes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 14:37:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA9C106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:37:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c_longfoot@hotmail.com) Received: from snt0-omc4-s27.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc4-s27.snt0.hotmail.com [65.55.90.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E6F8FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:37:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT121-W59 ([65.55.90.200]) by snt0-omc4-s27.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:37:32 -0800 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [77.3.154.63] From: Carolyn Longfoot To: , Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:37:32 +0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <201202261625.51082.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> References: , <201202261625.51082.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2012 14:37:32.0809 (UTC) FILETIME=[2CA28F90:01CCF494] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: RE: Custom Kernel Target Ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:37:33 -0000 > >=20 > make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DAsusAMD620 >=20 > is what I do. >=20 > Erich ARGHHH... KERNCONF not KERNELCONF... scuse my blindness... = From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 16:05:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A20106566C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF30D8FC18 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q1QG50fv015387; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:05:02 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: Carolyn Longfoot Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:04:59 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.3-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201202261625.51082.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202262304.59170.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Custom Kernel Target Ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:05:16 -0000 Hi, On Sunday 26 February 2012 21:37:32 Carolyn Longfoot wrote: > > > > > > make buildkernel KERNCONF=AsusAMD620 > > > > is what I do. > > > > Erich > > ARGHHH... KERNCONF not KERNELCONF... scuse my blindness... > this is what we are for. The simplest things are very often the most difficult to solve. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 17:46:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727A1106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:46:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FC38FC18 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-185-71.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.185.71]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859953DB7F; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:46:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q1QHkrWe002783; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:46:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:46:53 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Jerome Herman Message-Id: <20120226184653.e695327b.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4F498DF0.5070504@dichotomia.fr> References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F498DF0.5070504@dichotomia.fr> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:46:56 -0000 On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:42:08 +0100, Jerome Herman wrote: > You did nothing wrong, on the contrary. You now have a prefectly working > printer. You just need to tell cups it exists. > Since > > # foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c cupstest.ps> cupstest.xqx > # cat cupstest.xqx> /dev/ulpt0 > > works, you should be able to create a new printer using a direct device. > So go on as if you wanted to create a network printer, choose > HPJetDirect (for example) when asked about the connection. Then when you > have to input the uri remove the socket:// and type usb:///dev/ulpt0. > (Yes triple / before dev) > The you can process as usual for name, options and PPD. > If it doesn't work try parallel:///dev/ulpt0 Interesting approach. Fully "unimaginable" from the CUPS "guide to things" (i. e. how normal users _assume_ things should be done!), but interesting. I'll try that. The option to enter such kind of data ("parallel://" and "usb://" isn't mentioned): Add Printer ----------- Connection: _________________________________ Examples: http://hostname:631/ipp/ http://hostname:631/ipp/port1 ipp://hostname/ipp/ ipp://hostname/ipp/port1 lpd://hostname/queue socket://hostname socket://hostname:9100 See "Network Printers" for the correct URI to use with your print [ Continue ] See? Nothing for parallel or USB to enter manually. It's like going to a car salesman, buying a car, but before driving home from his yard, quickly exchanging the car you bought for the car you initially wanted. :-) > Normally one should work. Today, I tried to add the printer again. Unlike yesterday, it got detected! (Note: System shut down during night.) It also accepts print jobs, but they are stuck somewhere. % lpq -PSamsung_CLX-216x_Series Samsung_CLX-216x_Series is ready Rank Owner Job File(s) Total Size 1st poly 202 Unbenannt1 7563264 bytes This is from an OpenOffice session. The printer doesn't print anything. No action. > Basically in cups choosing "network connection" allows you to input any > URI you want, including file and raw (now defunct I think - it was > mainly for debug anyway). Why haven't the CUPS people thought of a kind of "know what you want mode" where you can simply enter what you think is correct, no matter if any auto-detection magic did work (or not)? > I never tried this specific printer, but this trick worked well on a few > HP and Canon. > Tell us how it went. I tried both of your suggestions for specifying the connection and chose the PPD file for the printer CLX-216xsplc.ppd (size 12208 bytes). Jobs get queued, printer "is ready", but no action on the printer. However, when I issue a command like this: % foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c /tmp/testpage.ps > /dev/ulpt0 pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' The printer works. The result is _very_ dark. But hey, it's stupid commodity hardware, and RGB and CMY are "a little bit" different, and nothing of the cheap crap is calibrated. :-) In the system log, I get those: ugen1.5: at usbus1 ulpt0: on usbus1 ulpt0: using bi-directional mode ulpt0: output error ulpt0: output error ulpt0: output error ulpt0: output error Unlike yesterday, the printer now is on ugen1.5. I'll have to play with the permissions a bit, maybe that's the reason why nothing can be printed, even though the changes I made for device permissions should cover all imaginable cases - all devices /dev/usb/* now are root:cups with crwxrwx--- permissions, the /dev/u(n)lpt0 devices are also root:cups with crw-rw---- permissions. Really, I _need_ to dump CUPS relapse to _standard_ system tools that seem to be easily capable of what the web-driven autodetected elastic-legged program magic of CUPS can't. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 17:51:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0761C106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71398FC13 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-185-71.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.185.71]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9343DD7B; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:51:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q1QHpm5r002793; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:51:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:51:48 +0100 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20120226185148.34d9b63c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4F497814.9000704@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120225231409.fdd67bff.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F497814.9000704@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Da Rock Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:51:51 -0000 On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:08:52 +1000, Da Rock wrote: > I don't know that I can add anything to the cups discussion here, but I > understand you'd rather use lpr anyway. You are aware that the printer > will only speak splix the samsung universal driver language? So any > config would have to be based on that. The foo2qpdl-wrapper program seems to support that fine. > Once you have that working maybe you can manually add the printer in > cups using lpd. Maybe? For sure! It's quite easy to do it (make entry in /etc/printcap, create spool directories, write printer filter one-liner "foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c" which is the essential part). I just hope printing will be possible from applications (Opera, OpenOffice and Gimp are the primary candidates) afterwards. You know, many "modern" programs _expect_ CUPS to be present, some have hardcoded "calls" to CUPS programs, some seem to even _not_ output PS (which should be standard), but instead PCL or whatnot. > JIC you haven't considered this yet... HIH :) Considered - yes, but I thought I would be able to avoid it and use the "modern" CUPS toolkit for something simple like printing. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 18:41:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D43106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1268FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so659469yhg.13 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:41:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.197.98 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.197.98; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.197.98 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jerry@seibercom.net Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.197.98]) by 10.236.197.98 with SMTP id s62mr14559355yhn.24.1330281660074 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:41:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.197.98 with SMTP id s62mr10841194yhn.24.1330281659989; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:40:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q55sm31620332yhi.0.2012.02.26.10.40.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:40:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Tww3Y3JQlz2CG4D for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 13:40:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 13:40:57 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120226134057.031b11b5@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120225230358.096ceeb9.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120225165536.082b0b4e@scorpio> <20120225230358.096ceeb9.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUAAABYRlwJCw4FAgAIBwKprDkBAQFQLR0BAgCir7VRttp8AAACAUlEQVQ4jZWUTYvbMBCGTVl8V2hX6Gg5G5FbWQdBj0lEfE7BhN4cyzi5Wt1E5L70roWy6N92xok/skkP+5IYrMcz78xIduDWpNM3vFzuA/jX5EY1AI6KHFwW/CzFuQAwqUBbV12p+CzIh6Awq7sg33pn5D64SQXAexffeuQlA/L35RrkaB551OjGfP/cAO8mCNaDcgvfky5ijoD0pAXlCQCnljiAjsJD9Ax05Ko5sZxbnLQcmM+dZg5IjREfZrWIHK0JuwU68pAGwHvfRxBundRzTxxz3r9dNUikPsEihjz2Dc4kjp1hKsJGuot4EDxaxzMoC7XqhxhOSfZrTS6gSX1JVdjp+o1PvWfekXgw3WL0g70nDEwA0H0HQsEZc8sTmFMTkWUfYWC/vdR1zQy3xLQgLwzu90QnlnFLjeiGWBjwhb4Sa42IqOg2qqS4O1/zhKokFUb1Q8Rj4Eb69WVflXEehJ35DgChVTE5n50eaGyMLOfH8AOodoSM4PVYAQgQdBulOa+knklYks3vAuQ+uX492lTl+A+e8qBV2AKoXalVKFfyuUp0pUp1ARaUHh82lv9MN+Ig7CZtgE6FNYvjlywT2VP2dMgOG46gTIWcqdfvuwyXNz0oMJNd/N5lh1YNiJt19ADTUo3VuFSNeQwVqRSrGjSCp53fk2g+Mvfk/gfoPxHeUS8MH9vRAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmO1Et5CJDAZnnUUvvuMmjjjwGaINI4YZ0axgIgdBdtRBI2vOAKrnfBOhkRM9PHy+bHZjin Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:41:01 -0000 On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 23:03:58 +0100 Polytropon articulated: > I _never_ would buy a USB printer, and I would also never > buy something that doesn't talk PS (or at least PCL). Both "PS" and to a lesser extent "PCL" are becoming passé. You might want to seriously consider "PDF". The better Brother printers fully support it as do some of the better printers from other manufacturers. You might want to check out for further details. The "PS" format is going to become considerably less important in a relatively short time in my estimation. By the way, have you considered a USB to Ethernet adapter? Totally untested with a printer, but it might work quite well. If it works, you could plug it into a wireless router and print from anywhere sans nasty cables, etcetera. I print wirelessly, and I love it. It "just works" and it makes my life simpler. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 18:50:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41ED106566B for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD588FC18 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1QIotAb010871; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q1QIotd8010868; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Polytropon In-Reply-To: <20120226185148.34d9b63c.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120225231409.fdd67bff.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F497814.9000704@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120226185148.34d9b63c.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Da Rock Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:50:59 -0000 On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:08:52 +1000, Da Rock wrote: >> I don't know that I can add anything to the cups discussion here, but I >> understand you'd rather use lpr anyway. You are aware that the printer >> will only speak splix the samsung universal driver language? So any >> config would have to be based on that. > > The foo2qpdl-wrapper program seems to support that fine. > > > >> Once you have that working maybe you can manually add the printer in >> cups using lpd. > > Maybe? For sure! It's quite easy to do it (make entry in > /etc/printcap, create spool directories, write printer > filter one-liner "foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c" which is the > essential part). I just hope printing will be possible > from applications (Opera, OpenOffice and Gimp are the > primary candidates) afterwards. Opera, I have not tried. OpenOffice and LibreOffice print through lpd fine. Printing through Gutenprint in Gimp also works without CUPS. Something has a probably-unnecessary dependency on cups-client, so it's installed here, but none of the rest of CUPS. PS: using the non-resetting unlpt0 device is often helpful. A network connection is still better. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 21:29:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CEE41065688 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:29:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jherman@dichotomia.fr) Received: from mail.dichotomia.fr (hydrogen.dichotomia.net [91.121.82.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145308FC1A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:29:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.11] (unknown [109.190.13.180]) (Authenticated sender: kha@dichotomia.fr) by sslmail.dichotomia.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A3EF3DD034; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:28:47 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F4AA428.2010503@dichotomia.fr> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:29:12 +0100 From: Jerome Herman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F498DF0.5070504@dichotomia.fr> <20120226184653.e695327b.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120226184653.e695327b.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (sslmail.dichotomia.fr); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:28:48 +0100 (CET) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:29:18 -0000 On 26/02/2012 18:46, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:42:08 +0100, Jerome Herman wrote: >> You did nothing wrong, on the contrary. You now have a prefectly working >> printer. You just need to tell cups it exists. >> Since >> >> # foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c cupstest.ps> cupstest.xqx >> # cat cupstest.xqx> /dev/ulpt0 >> >> works, you should be able to create a new printer using a direct device. >> So go on as if you wanted to create a network printer, choose >> HPJetDirect (for example) when asked about the connection. Then when you >> have to input the uri remove the socket:// and type usb:///dev/ulpt0. >> (Yes triple / before dev) >> The you can process as usual for name, options and PPD. >> If it doesn't work try parallel:///dev/ulpt0 > Interesting approach. Fully "unimaginable" from the CUPS > "guide to things" (i. e. how normal users _assume_ things > should be done!), but interesting. I'll try that. > > The option to enter such kind of data ("parallel://" and > "usb://" isn't mentioned): > > > > Add Printer > ----------- > > Connection: _________________________________ > > Examples: > > http://hostname:631/ipp/ > http://hostname:631/ipp/port1 > > ipp://hostname/ipp/ > ipp://hostname/ipp/port1 > > lpd://hostname/queue > > socket://hostname > socket://hostname:9100 > > See "Network Printers" for the correct URI to use with your print > > [ Continue ] > > See? Nothing for parallel or USB to enter manually. > > > > It's like going to a car salesman, buying a car, but before > driving home from his yard, quickly exchanging the car you > bought for the car you initially wanted. :-) Not at all, the web admin for adding a printer is basically an html version of lpadmin. It is just easier with the web site. > > > >> Normally one should work. > Today, I tried to add the printer again. Unlike yesterday, > it got detected! (Note: System shut down during night.) > It also accepts print jobs, but they are stuck somewhere. > > % lpq -PSamsung_CLX-216x_Series > Samsung_CLX-216x_Series is ready > Rank Owner Job File(s) Total Size > 1st poly 202 Unbenannt1 7563264 bytes > > This is from an OpenOffice session. The printer doesn't > print anything. No action. OK this means the ppd does not handle everything. Might get a little complicated. > > > >> Basically in cups choosing "network connection" allows you to input any >> URI you want, including file and raw (now defunct I think - it was >> mainly for debug anyway). > Why haven't the CUPS people thought of a kind of "know what > you want mode" where you can simply enter what you think is > correct, no matter if any auto-detection magic did work (or > not)? They did, then they got bought by Apple... > > > >> I never tried this specific printer, but this trick worked well on a few >> HP and Canon. > > >> Tell us how it went. > I tried both of your suggestions for specifying the connection > and chose the PPD file for the printer CLX-216xsplc.ppd (size > 12208 bytes). Jobs get queued, printer "is ready", but no > action on the printer. > > However, when I issue a command like this: > > % foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c /tmp/testpage.ps> /dev/ulpt0 > pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' > pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' > pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' > pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' > > The printer works. The result is _very_ dark. But hey, it's > stupid commodity hardware, and RGB and CMY are "a little bit" > different, and nothing of the cheap crap is calibrated. :-) > > In the system log, I get those: > > ugen1.5: at usbus1 > ulpt0: class 0/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 5> on usbus1 > ulpt0: using bi-directional mode > ulpt0: output error > ulpt0: output error > ulpt0: output error > ulpt0: output error > > Unlike yesterday, the printer now is on ugen1.5. I'll have to play > with the permissions a bit, maybe that's the reason why nothing > can be printed, even though the changes I made for device permissions > should cover all imaginable cases - all devices /dev/usb/* now > are root:cups with crwxrwx--- permissions > , the /dev/u(n)lpt0 > devices are also root:cups with crw-rw---- permissions. > > Really, I _need_ to dump CUPS relapse to _standard_ system tools > that seem to be easily capable of what the web-driven autodetected > elastic-legged program magic of CUPS can't. :-) No, please don't blame CUPS, it is earnestly trying to cope with everything thrown at him (stupid printers, gnome DBus autoconfig, Apple Mac OSX and so on), and it is doing a fairly good job at it. I for one do not want to go back to the time where one had to learn 2 lines long LPD command just to print in color, double side, with an ICM profile. Getting back to your problem. Apparently you are using an old version of foo2qpdl, you may want to grab it from the web site directly and compile it by hand (One of the very rare case where using the default package/port is not a good idea at all) You can find the howto here : http://foo2qpdl.rkkda.com/ You will need to download and link the ICM profile to have acceptable print quality. The latest PPD is 24 874 bytes in size. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 21:41:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F359106566C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:41:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from oproxy3-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy3.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C5148FC17 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29820 invoked by uid 0); 26 Feb 2012 21:41:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by oproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2012 21:41:41 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apotheon.com; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=1u8NWinlFvst+STZgl/WoEOInyw6B0ZSvS++yaTt/NI=; b=h3KuKLmPShm2s7q5JeNUozlzdY/Grq1sn0trWirlUVvWhwT/mbRt04xWHWhVA6UUfes2sS8nkMqz42D+BS/hHmLplqEzCDoTT4X89ipfq8Q++GUyAnIIO8OYcEHDEB3F; Received: from [70.98.65.183] (helo=localhost) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S1lqf-0001io-Er for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:41:41 -0700 Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:41:35 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120226214135.GA14375@hemlock.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201202241432.29069.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> <201202261109.13748.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201202261109.13748.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.com} {sentby:smtp auth 70.98.65.183 authed with perrin@apotheon.com} Subject: Re: Why is this Symbol in the front of your website. A humble request. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:41:42 -0000 On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:09:13AM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > always these complicated things. This is why life here is so much more > exiting. > > We do not need sysctl. I guess that depends on your definition of sysctl, and I rather like it. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 22:20:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19836106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:20:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D368FC18 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so746398wib.13 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:20:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.78.6 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.78.6; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.78.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ml@my.gd Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.78.6]) by 10.180.78.6 with SMTP id x6mr13072229wiw.18.1330294827560 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:20:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.78.6 with SMTP id x6mr10339079wiw.18.1330294827513; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:20:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (did75-17-88-165-130-96.fbx.proxad.net. [88.165.130.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hb10sm45397861wib.10.2012.02.26.14.20.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:20:26 -0800 (PST) References: <201202261625.51082.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8J2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8J2) From: Damien Fleuriot Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:19:40 +0100 To: Carolyn Longfoot X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmEB7ok+mWjfR7bkW964kz1tJoSKviBR/BFOCKTPzaC7LWn/6wSEONLekjcHNpi0S//APxH Cc: "" , "" Subject: Re: Custom Kernel Target Ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:20:29 -0000 On 26 Feb 2012, at 15:37, Carolyn Longfoot wrote: >=20 >>>=20 >> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DAsusAMD620 >>=20 >> is what I do. >>=20 >> Erich >=20 > ARGHHH... KERNCONF not KERNELCONF... scuse my blindness... >=20 Pro tip, put it in your /etc/make.conf like so: KERNCONF=3DWHATEVERYOUSAID Then cd /usr/src && make buildkernel You might also want to have a look at MODULES_OVERRIDE, also to be put in ma= ke.conf , saves a huge lot of time.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 01:16:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3878A1065677 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:16:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DStaal@usa.net) Received: from mail.magehandbook.com (173-8-4-45-WashingtonDC.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.4.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079F48FC0A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (Mac-Pro.magehandbook.com [192.168.1.50]) by mail.magehandbook.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3Tx4qT6BSSz1SJ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:16:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:14:43 -0500 From: Daniel Staal To: Bernt Hansson , "Bender, Chris" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> References: <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:16:07 -0000 --As of February 26, 2012 8:20:14 AM +0100, Bernt Hansson is alleged to have said: > http://www.uk.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html > > Have you tried to telnet into the other jailed hostnames and > ip-addresses, like telnet rt3.* 25 > > What does it say? Can you connect? > > There seems to be either a jail problem or a routing problem > > You can look at your routing table with netstat -r --As for the rest, it is mine. This is my strong suspicion as well. To separate out what the problem is: 'su' to root in the jailed system. Shut down postfix. (`postfix stop`, or `/etc/rc.d/postfix stop`) Then run `nc -l 25`. This will echo anything that comes in on port 25 direct to your terminal. Then try telneting to it. If it works, the problem is postfix. If it doesn't, restart postfix and ignore it: It's not the problem. Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 09:26:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A931065670 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:26:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronnyma@volatile.no) Received: from na3sys010aog105.obsmtp.com (na3sys010aog105.obsmtp.com [74.125.245.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A1D48FC12 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob105.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT0tMXXhG+NlMZi73m8RkaGx+wqoLt+Z0@postini.com; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:26:55 PST Received: by mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com with SMTP id x4so5421914obh.20 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:26:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ronnyma@volatile.no designates 10.60.20.9 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.60.20.9; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ronnyma@volatile.no designates 10.60.20.9 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ronnyma@volatile.no; dkim=pass header.i=ronnyma@volatile.no Received: from mr.google.com ([10.60.20.9]) by 10.60.20.9 with SMTP id j9mr5532646oee.6.1330334813344 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:26:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=volatile.no; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=TOnkdgszTlwDkbs9POG7kqWsF1YGlLucg6h2+7jhhdk=; b=ZwFu5oMz/YMgHuUE7eq+AiulDdXlfxDO+VNv3QoCsVQxXZe285kqXb0ebqOv9yDlpU L62b8kmV74tImtAO3iXcjZMzRBaC8zTqKeWBXEbhtaIhq8C1AtYU80Qt54vrfl9MgdVx k574yxZrIj4jpZE3BRtJfyBKqYO7zLy3xnyaE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.20.9 with SMTP id j9mr4849709oee.6.1330334813183; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:26:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.20.1 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:26:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F47A295.6020200@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4F47A295.6020200@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:26:53 +0100 Message-ID: From: Ronny Mandal To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkmVcaE9PaguXJGgiexAJJ6hIGc3yVxNPV8yXbvOoGgp8mTRAyegYkx+UmrYFu6uGYBhgU3 Subject: Re: 9.0, Samba and two NICs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:26:56 -0000 On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Da Rock wrote: > On 02/24/12 21:39, Ronny Mandal wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> I have been running Samba on FreeBSD 9.0 with a wireless card. A share >> is connected to my W7 computer. To get more speed between the >> computers, I decided to activate the 1GBit- Ethernet on the FreeBSD >> and establish a direct connection (cross-link) to the W7. I gave the >> new connection a static IP/subnet: 10.0.0.2/255.0.0.0 for the FreeBSD >> and 10.0.0.1/255.0.0.0 for the W7. SSH works fine, however Samba is >> utilizing the wireless card. >> >> My smb.conf looks something like this: >> >> .. >> ;The 192-address is the wireless, ath0. 10.0.0.2 is age0 >> interfaces = 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.232 10.0.0.2 >> bind interfaces only = yes >> ; the two latter is the IPs of the W7 >> hosts allow = 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.117 10.0.0.1 >> >> >> If I remove the 192* in the hosts allow, my W7 looses access via smb. >> >> netstat tells me that it is listening to both interfaces. >> >> What might be wrong? > > What address is the w7 using? > > If it is using 192.X, that could be the problem. That or some variation... > such as the w7 using wireless and 192.x? Sorry about the late answer and missing info. The W7 is using both, i.e. wireless and wired. Strangely enough, it works now. Here is what I did: The interface parameter; I put the 10.* before the 192.* and stopped and started the samba-service. After that, the wired card were utilized when I copied to and from the share. interfaces = 192.168.0.232 10.0.0.2 127.0.0.1 changed to interfaces = 10.0.0.2 192.168.0.232 127.0.0.1 (I tried this earlier, but it seems that /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba restart did not properly re-read the configuration.) Regards, Ronny Mandal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 13:49:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD19106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmk.sbor@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA4D8FC1E for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk4 with SMTP id k4so1026611ggn.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:49:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of dmk.sbor@gmail.com designates 10.236.72.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.72.170; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of dmk.sbor@gmail.com designates 10.236.72.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=dmk.sbor@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=dmk.sbor@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.72.170]) by 10.236.72.170 with SMTP id t30mr21353819yhd.101.1330350595060 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:49:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qwDbbc8fRksUurHBg9m2nK6NAjeR6efMjSD4INUmx/E=; b=PxkENXmD1Hoo4kpTSqOLoUcz2vd7gYTjKbQT7/ZpEH6I07k1trRK5/35Sxksy1AGJv o3hfOMql80ClJ2+4L1JJYAono4NU/ANpEAh7OFcETzIaBTOsqe14db37oyhRkCSDLBiq g3wGKjUImWbKmfuS2skMyREbIgaK+GEpyDHKc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.72.170 with SMTP id t30mr15766837yhd.101.1330348967398; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:22:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.146.204.2 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:22:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:22:47 +0300 Message-ID: From: "Dmitry S. Kasterin" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Recurring "rescan already queued" message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:49:56 -0000 Hello! I am trying to install 9.0-RELEASE from standard amd64 memstick image. During the install huge amount of "rescan already queued" messages breaks installer interface. (noperiph:ata1:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued (noperiph:ata1:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued (noperiph:ata1:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued (noperiph:ata1:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued So, I have 2 questions: 1) Are these messages harmless? 2) Messages are a little bit annoying. So, is there any way to suppress them? Some remarks: 1) I am trying to install FreeBSD on HP ProBook 4730s, which seems to be affected by a recent Intel bug: http://ixbtlabs.com/articles3/cpu/intel-6x-chipset-bug-p1.html 2) HDD is ada0 on ata0. 3) The messages are genetared constantly: # dmesg | grep "rescan already queued" | wc -l 98 # uptime ... 14 mins ... 4) I've tried to suppress messages by setting "hint.ata.1.disabled=1", but this had no effect (may be due to my mistake?) 5) Verbose kernel log has the following part: (aprobe0:ata1:0:0:0): SOFT_RESET. ACB: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 (aprobe0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM status: Selection Timeout (aprobe0:ata1:0:1:0): SOFT_RESET. ACB: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 (aprobe0:ata1:0:1:0): CAM status: Selection Timeout ata1: SATA reset: ports status=0x00 ata1: p0: SATA connect timeout status=00000004 ata1: p1: SATA connect timeout status=00000000 ata1: DISCONNECT requested ata1: SATA reset: ports status=0x00 ata1: p0: SATA connect timeout status=00000004 ata1: p1: SATA connect timeout status=00000000 ata1: DISCONNECT requested ata1: SATA reset: ports status=0x00 ata1: p0: SATA connect timeout status=00000004 ata1: p1: SATA connect timeout status=00000000 (noperiph:ata1:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued ata1: DISCONNECT requested 6) vmstat -i gives the following: interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd0 653 4 irq9: acpi0 417 2 irq14: ata0 164 1 irq16: ehci0 ehci1 12335 81 cpu0:timer 75201 498 irq256: hdac0 12 0 cpu1:timer 92952 615 cpu2:timer 74159 491 cpu3:timer 97503 645 Total 353396 2340 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 14:46:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F12106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:46:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Arindam.Misra@netapp.com) Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B678FC13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:46:48 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,490,1325491200"; d="scan'208,217";a="628844441" Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2012 06:18:31 -0800 Received: from vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.106.77.35]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id q1REIEpO002569 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:18:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.6.92]) by vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.77.35]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:18:27 -0800 From: "Misra, Arindam" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Thread-Topic: NTP Autokey configuration Thread-Index: Acz1Wp4l1w3q9dxxQye9kmkELOdmrw== Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:18:26 +0000 Message-ID: <4537B3EC79B7CC45B125AB3F585198010C58CF@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.106.53.53] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: NTP Autokey configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:46:49 -0000 Hi, I have a two servers both of which are not public, I want to configure one = of them as a server and the other as a client for ntpd. What is the exact c= onfiguration required in both client and servers to get the autokey protoco= l working? I shall be thankful if you could send a ntp.conf file which work= s for a scenario described above. Arindam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 15:20:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1ADD1065678 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from ifdnrg30.ifdnrg.com (outbound.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D09D8FC1C for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.86] (93-97-172-73.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.172.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by ifdnrg30.ifdnrg.com (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1RFK6WP082589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:20:08 GMT (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Message-ID: <4F4B9F26.7060407@ifdnrg.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:20:06 +0000 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Misra, Arindam" References: <4537B3EC79B7CC45B125AB3F585198010C58CF@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com> In-Reply-To: <4537B3EC79B7CC45B125AB3F585198010C58CF@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: NTP Autokey configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:20:43 -0000 On 27/02/2012 14:18, Misra, Arindam wrote: > Hi, > > > I have a two servers both of which are not public, I want to configure one of them as a server and the other as a client for ntpd. What is the exact configuration required in both client and servers to get the autokey protocol working? I shall be thankful if you could send a ntp.conf file which works for a scenario described above. > > Arindam i presume you've tried: http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Support/ConfiguringAutokey#Section_6.7.2.2. (you'll likely need to use 'freeBSD' paths for /etc/ i.e /usr/local/etc/ if installed from ports). I particulalrly liked *6.7.1 (How to use this guide*) 1. Perform the server set-up before performing the client set-up 2. Follow each step in this guide > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- ------------------------- Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting ------------------------- t: 0131 5548070 m: 07970339546< Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE33A106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:40:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from nm22-vm7.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (nm22-vm7.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D64F8FC0A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [217.146.183.209] by nm22.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Feb 2012 15:27:05 -0000 Received: from [77.238.184.57] by tm2.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Feb 2012 15:27:05 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp126.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Feb 2012 15:27:05 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1330356425; bh=3ibngkbZPWDXakDlUWdXgNAqIQlyq/E/zC7csRoCE9o=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Received:Return-Path:Received-SPF:Authentication-Results:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=hIUpXLpxR/5if0GAxhzBQWxNYpFa1Eu212qXPVD2R09HjZjq0BsczNkuTEbwQHz5xUOOHNXjj1eQeQ92UFtOEV71wWWNgjqMPUcr/P8xnzQJe6us3nLvBygbJEr3wSgGCHPZyhoCJdE3xmjHZRIXEn76gHQeIaEnSoNb/VidoRM= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 120078.68089.bm@smtp126.mail.ukl.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 7B_HmxcVM1n.MbpKv0wX5I9QWe1OEmuPpXvw13hG5M94kxE tQ3qjvUjK1s2bL2yHSmGjm5NlKsuh4B1DqKipj7BQeMLtvSwJL6Rb6.ZXtXS LDD16AHH0E78w0tvtZLSwv8IlIBZkQOFJk.s2ZUgjP_rggEv9bMJF_6cLpeD 8Bbh_MnpVwh24u7alRetWfNlzKJ2T48.4QYuRhPw6ACN5TAUnptWwwMg0B5q MKAn64N3Ui6MqmR3t9k7p1l0bQEAqHU8seuZ17Ml4UX_f5Iwk202ftDzcfWv A5K1jjkaWGQBsBX6cYB022jWz3JXmm6zQb6cAC_MSk9CEm0Yt2KalNFQ5U7v ZXuxmw4hGf7RQI.IMJ2Q8jzyM2Wn4CKMX1F8HDw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: S65s63SswBDjU54Gjqw2GSWlZmfgiEU_X3tN1_9u Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (axelbsd@209.85.210.182 with plain) by smtp126.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Feb 2012 15:27:04 +0000 GMT Received: by iaae16 with SMTP id e16so560994iaa.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:27:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of axelbsd@ymail.com designates 10.42.161.73 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.42.161.73; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of axelbsd@ymail.com designates 10.42.161.73 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=axelbsd@ymail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.42.161.73]) by 10.42.161.73 with SMTP id s9mr14323268icx.16.1330356423730 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:27:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.161.73 with SMTP id s9mr11522410icx.16.1330356034903; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:20:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.147.1 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:20:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4537B3EC79B7CC45B125AB3F585198010C58CF@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com> References: <4537B3EC79B7CC45B125AB3F585198010C58CF@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com> From: Alexandre Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:20:14 +0100 Message-ID: To: "Misra, Arindam" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: NTP Autokey configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:40:27 -0000 Hi, A good start is the manpage of ntp.conf http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ntp.conf&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE+and+Ports&arch=default&format=html The authentification support is described. You have the handbook page for the basics : http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-ntp.html Regards, Alexandre On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Misra, Arindam wrote: > Hi, > > > I have a two servers both of which are not public, I want to configure one > of them as a server and the other as a client for ntpd. What is the exact > configuration required in both client and servers to get the autokey > protocol working? I shall be thankful if you could send a ntp.conf file > which works for a scenario described above. > > Arindam > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 16:12:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C7E106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:12:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris_bender@cellularatsea.com) Received: from wireless.icgws.com (wireless.icgws.com [198.211.94.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE448FC08 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:12:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id CDA86180DE3; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:11:33 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on wireless.icgws.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (unknown [10.200.250.42]) by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B3B6C180DE2; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:11:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BED18B18E88; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:12:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com ([10.200.104.15] helo=wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com) by wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com with SMTP (ASSP 1.9.1.1); 27 Feb 2012 11:12:28 -0500 X-Ninja-PIM: Scanned by Ninja X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message x-vipre-scanned: 0FF5CA34002D4D0FF5CB81 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:12:26 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> Thread-Topic: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. Thread-Index: Acz0VyuxoJlMif1qRAW3ikXcgENrowBExO3A References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFC23@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> From: "Bender, Chris" To: "Bernt Hansson" X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes () X-Assp-Envelope-From: chris_bender@cellularatsea.com X-Assp-Intended-For: bah@bananmonarki.se X-Assp-Passing: 10.200.104.15 in acceptAllMail X-Assp-ID: wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (33035-51377) X-Assp-Version: 1.9.1.1(1.0.00) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:12:43 -0000 Hello Can anybody assist me with pfctl on freebsd? I have pfctl running as adaptive. It is blocking some smtp mail.=20 I am uncertain about flushing the states or machining some of the=20 TIMEWAITING constraints go away. Which is really blocking my email. Can anyone assist? Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Bernt Hansson [mailto:bah@bananmonarki.se]=20 Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 2:20 AM To: Bender, Chris Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. 2012-02-26 00:54, Bender, Chris skrev: > Hi Brent > > Yes the system we are calling X, is jailed by another system. > > Here is the jailer system: > > zs1# netstat -aptcp | grep smtp > tcp4 0 0 tools2.smtp 10.156.31.20.45081 > SYN_RCVD > tcp4 0 0 tools2.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 rt3.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 npims.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 wiki.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 localhost.smtp *.* LISTEN Here is about jails; http://www.uk.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html Have you tried to telnet into the other jailed hostnames and ip-addresses, like telnet rt3.* 25 What does it say? Can you connect? There seems to be either a jail problem or a routing problem You can look at your routing table with netstat -r From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 16:20:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F271065670 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:20:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris_bender@cellularatsea.com) Received: from wireless.icgws.com (wireless.icgws.com [198.211.94.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E36658FC13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:20:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 0BB59180DE3; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:20:00 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on wireless.icgws.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (unknown [10.200.250.42]) by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A14AD180DD7; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:19:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CBE85B18E84; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:20:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com ([10.200.104.15] helo=wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com) by wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com with SMTP (ASSP 1.9.1.1); 27 Feb 2012 11:20:56 -0500 X-Ninja-PIM: Scanned by Ninja X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message x-vipre-scanned: 0FFD8D92002D4D0FFD8EDF Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:20:55 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> Thread-Topic: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. Thread-Index: Acz0VyuxoJlMif1qRAW3ikXcgENrowBFHqDA References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFC23@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> From: "Bender, Chris" To: "Bernt Hansson" X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes () X-Assp-Envelope-From: chris_bender@cellularatsea.com X-Assp-Intended-For: bah@bananmonarki.se X-Assp-Passing: 10.200.104.15 in acceptAllMail X-Assp-ID: wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (33035-51390) X-Assp-Version: 1.9.1.1(1.0.00) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:20:59 -0000 Does anybody have an idea on how to clear the bruteforCE TABLE ON PFCTL ? An adaptive fw or pftcl device is blocking some of my email? Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Bernt Hansson [mailto:bah@bananmonarki.se]=20 Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 2:20 AM To: Bender, Chris Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. 2012-02-26 00:54, Bender, Chris skrev: > Hi Brent > > Yes the system we are calling X, is jailed by another system. > > Here is the jailer system: > > zs1# netstat -aptcp | grep smtp > tcp4 0 0 tools2.smtp 10.156.31.20.45081 > SYN_RCVD > tcp4 0 0 tools2.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 rt3.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 npims.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 wiki.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 localhost.smtp *.* LISTEN Here is about jails; http://www.uk.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html Have you tried to telnet into the other jailed hostnames and ip-addresses, like telnet rt3.* 25 What does it say? Can you connect? There seems to be either a jail problem or a routing problem You can look at your routing table with netstat -r From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 16:39:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5FA1065672 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:39:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600748FC16 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 10571382; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:39:09 -0500 Received: from [192.168.43.246] (account jon@radel.com HELO winesap.local) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 10571380; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:38:50 -0500 Message-ID: <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:38:50 -0500 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bender, Chris" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBAE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48BAF6.9070204@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBE7@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48EC21.7040805@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBEE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48F45F.4080304@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBF4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F492262.5090505@radel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms000301060109020809020706" X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:39:13 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms000301060109020809020706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/25/12 1:39 PM, Bender, Chris wrote: > Thanks. There aren't any firewalls between the devices but they are far= apart. On 2/27/12 11:12 AM, Bender, Chris wrote: > Can anybody assist me with pfctl on freebsd? > I have pfctl running as adaptive. It is blocking some smtp mail. !!!!! BTW, pfctl is the program for controlling the firewall. The actual=20 firewall is generally referred to as pf. So if you just turn PF off for a bit, does e-mail suddenly flow? --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms000301060109020809020706-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 16:45:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45704106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:45:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris_bender@cellularatsea.com) Received: from wireless.icgws.com (wireless.icgws.com [198.211.94.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092EC8FC15 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id EDCEF180DE3; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:44:36 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on wireless.icgws.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (unknown [10.200.250.42]) by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BAC74180D7E; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:44:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E74EDB18E84; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:45:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com ([10.200.104.15] helo=wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com) by wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com with SMTP (ASSP 1.9.1.1); 27 Feb 2012 11:45:32 -0500 X-Ninja-PIM: Scanned by Ninja X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message x-vipre-scanned: 1014126B002D4D101413B8 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:45:31 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> Thread-Topic: Email issues, relay failure Thread-Index: Acz1bl2zv6wT9KJhRJ2mRT7nxHRm5QAAFWWQ References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBAE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48BAF6.9070204@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBE7@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48EC21.7040805@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBEE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48F45F.4080304@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBF4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F492262.5090505@radel.com> <7409DAB4-F76A-493B-9A50-A663E6F6802E@cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> From: "Bender, Chris" To: "Jon Radel" X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes () X-Assp-Envelope-From: chris_bender@cellularatsea.com X-Assp-Intended-For: jon@radel.com X-Assp-Passing: 10.200.104.15 in acceptAllMail X-Assp-ID: wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (33036-51431) X-Assp-Version: 1.9.1.1(1.0.00) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Email issues, relay failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:45:35 -0000 Yes after a few minutes the email in question begins to flow. AT some point in the past some of the postfix boxes behind the firewall Where turned off. This caused the fw, I believe to think it was being Attacked because it had nowhere to push the smtp traffic. I believe that is why on several IPs I see TIME_WAITING for the connections. I was thinking about just reloading the pf.conf but I have never worked with pf so=20 I am worried other things might break. My thought was by doing that the=20 Adaptive part of the pfctl would be restarted? Does that make sense would reloading the rules wash the adaptive behavior away or Would all that still be in some sort of bruteforce file to protect the firewall? Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Jon Radel [mailto:jon@radel.com]=20 Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 11:39 AM To: Bender, Chris; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure On 2/25/12 1:39 PM, Bender, Chris wrote: > Thanks. There aren't any firewalls between the devices but they are far apart. On 2/27/12 11:12 AM, Bender, Chris wrote: > Can anybody assist me with pfctl on freebsd? > I have pfctl running as adaptive. It is blocking some smtp mail. !!!!! BTW, pfctl is the program for controlling the firewall. The actual=20 firewall is generally referred to as pf. So if you just turn PF off for a bit, does e-mail suddenly flow? --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 16:54:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98B5106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:54:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sclists@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607348FC1F for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:54:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so1077564vbm.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:54:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sclists@gmail.com designates 10.220.157.83 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.220.157.83; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sclists@gmail.com designates 10.220.157.83 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sclists@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=sclists@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.220.157.83]) by 10.220.157.83 with SMTP id a19mr9746166vcx.54.1330361655714 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:54:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cPgc7GyBkEQal7RC1MYSqW16KhT+r8cZb3ktYM6lD9Y=; b=mOgK+oZz6DbNqN/XXsMC73ry3JDMBGNBsRQTfUj8kpwf9mxE/DYsL5TU0EzQC4b/zT bw+vZB9gnnlmSukNXWl+z10/QYF3bOVkc9LRRdvOM05giIFEH/BfNhC95Y9gGuRt6WGX 3ToYyfIWqXgP6xHCQgEipveSUVzV9Gkbn3620= Received: by 10.220.157.83 with SMTP id a19mr7860525vcx.54.1330361655675; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:54:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (ool-182c6755.dyn.optonline.net. [24.44.103.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ie6sm11359648vdb.5.2012.02.27.08.54.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:54:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:54:17 -0500 From: Stephen Cook User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Cloning a FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:54:16 -0000 Hello all! I'm relatively new to FreeBSD but I'm enjoying it so far. I have FreeBSD 9.0 installed as a VirtualBox guest, and I plan on cloning it repeatedly to set up a fake network for me to toy with (e.g. setting up clusters of replicated databases, web server pools, etc). Here's the list of things I need to change on each new clone, am I missing anything obvious? Or are there any gotchas to what I'm trying? 1) I have to change the hostname in rc.conf 2) I have to change the IP address in rc.conf (I'm using static IPs) 2a) I saw (on the internet) some people having problems because VirtualBox generates a new MAC address for cloned "machines", which somehow screws up the naming of the network interfaces (e.g. they get renumbered, thereby ignoring any configuration you have set up). Now I can't find it anymore, at least not for FreeBSD. Some Linux forums have info about "/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules" which doesn't exist in FreeBSD as far as I can tell. Is this a concern? I don't seem to be having a problem but TBH I'd rather understand what is going on than just be lucky. 3) Create new SSH keys 3a) For host keys, I can delete the existing ones in /etc/ssh/ and reboot, is there a better way? 3b) Should I bother changing the SSH keys for any users I have? It is basically one user (I use to log in with) which will be the same across the board anyway. Thanks for any insight! -- Stephen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 16:58:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C83C1065679 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EA28FC0A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 10571415; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:58:09 -0500 Received: from [192.168.43.246] (account jon@radel.com HELO winesap.local) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 10571413; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:58:03 -0500 Message-ID: <4F4BB61A.1060600@radel.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:58:02 -0500 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bender, Chris" References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBAE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48BAF6.9070204@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBE7@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48EC21.7040805@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBEE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48F45F.4080304@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBF4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F492262.5090505@radel.com> <7409DAB4-F76A-493B-9A50-A663E6F6802E@cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms080506060205070603050200" X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:58:10 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms080506060205070603050200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/27/12 11:45 AM, Bender, Chris wrote: > I was thinking about just reloading the pf.conf but I have never worked= > with pf so > I am worried other things might break. My thought was by doing that the= > Adaptive part of the pfctl would be restarted? Any pf.conf file I've ever seen does something sensible after reload.=20 I suspect one could write something perverse that blows up on restart,=20 but that would making rebooting the machine problematic.... > > Does that make sense would reloading the rules wash the adaptive > behavior away or > Would all that still be in some sort of bruteforce file to protect the > firewall? pf can load data from files when it starts or just manage things in a=20 fashion that is transient upon restart. Hard to say what's happening in = your case w/o a clue as to what's in pf.conf. I'd suggest that you at the very least whitelist internal SMTP speakers=20 that you expect to get e-mail from on a regular basis, even if you do=20 throttling of SMTP connections in general. Much less messy.... --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms080506060205070603050200-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 17:00:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF08F106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:00:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris_bender@cellularatsea.com) Received: from wireless.icgws.com (wireless.icgws.com [198.211.94.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E8B8FC18 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:00:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 9E8A5180DCA; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:59:48 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on wireless.icgws.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (unknown [10.200.250.42]) by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 651C5180D25; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:59:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 922ACB1885D; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:00:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com ([10.200.104.15] helo=wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com) by wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com with SMTP (ASSP 1.9.1.1); 27 Feb 2012 12:00:44 -0500 X-Ninja-PIM: Scanned by Ninja X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message x-vipre-scanned: 1021FDB3002D4D1021FF00 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:00:43 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F4BB61A.1060600@radel.com> Thread-Topic: Email issues, relay failure Thread-Index: Acz1cP1DAMqrc42YSSCbJ5xM8yHO1gAACQng References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBAE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48BAF6.9070204@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBE7@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48EC21.7040805@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBEE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48F45F.4080304@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBF4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F492262.5090505@radel.com> <7409DAB4-F76A-493B-9A50-A663E6F6802E@cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFDA4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB61A.1060600@radel.com> From: "Bender, Chris" To: "Jon Radel" X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes () X-Assp-Envelope-From: chris_bender@cellularatsea.com X-Assp-Intended-For: jon@radel.com X-Assp-Passing: 10.200.104.15 in acceptAllMail X-Assp-ID: wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (33036-51455) X-Assp-Version: 1.9.1.1(1.0.00) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Email issues, relay failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:00:46 -0000 How would I whitelist SMTP speakers? I am thinking it would be ok to reload the rules, would that clear the issue with SMTP users for now? Whats the harm? Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Jon Radel [mailto:jon@radel.com]=20 Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 11:58 AM To: Bender, Chris Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure On 2/27/12 11:45 AM, Bender, Chris wrote: > I was thinking about just reloading the pf.conf but I have never worked > with pf so > I am worried other things might break. My thought was by doing that the > Adaptive part of the pfctl would be restarted? Any pf.conf file I've ever seen does something sensible after reload.=20 I suspect one could write something perverse that blows up on restart,=20 but that would making rebooting the machine problematic.... > > Does that make sense would reloading the rules wash the adaptive > behavior away or > Would all that still be in some sort of bruteforce file to protect the > firewall? pf can load data from files when it starts or just manage things in a=20 fashion that is transient upon restart. Hard to say what's happening= in your case w/o a clue as to what's in pf.conf. I'd suggest that you at the very least whitelist internal SMTP speakers=20 that you expect to get e-mail from on a regular basis, even if you do=20 throttling of SMTP connections in general. Much less messy.... --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 17:09:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4D71065670 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:09:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E688FC1E for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 10571448; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:09:24 -0500 Received: from [192.168.43.246] (account jon@radel.com HELO winesap.local) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 10571442; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:09:12 -0500 Message-ID: <4F4BB8B8.509@radel.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:09:12 -0500 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bender, Chris" References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBAE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48BAF6.9070204@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBE7@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48EC21.7040805@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBEE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48F45F.4080304@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBF4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F492262.5090505@radel.com> <7409DAB4-F76A-493B-9A50-A663E6F6802E@cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFDA4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB61A.1060600@radel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms070009010202000007090903" X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:09:26 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms070009010202000007090903 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/27/12 12:00 PM, Bender, Chris wrote: > > How would I whitelist SMTP speakers? You're invited to read the documentation. The Book of PF: A No-Nonsense = Guide to the OpenBSD Firewall, 2nd ed., is also rather informative,=20 although one has to keep in mind that the version of PF in FreeBSD lags=20 that in OpenBSD. > I am thinking it would be ok to reload the rules, would that clear the > issue with SMTP users for now? > Whats the harm? The universe might grind to a halt. This would upset a great many=20 people. This outcome, however, is exceedingly unlikely. Again, with no clue as to what's in pf.conf, I could offer only the=20 vaguest guesses based in part on my judged competence of the author of=20 your pf.conf. Since your pf.conf appears to have possibly destroyed=20 your e-mail infrastructure, the preliminary assessment is a bit shaky. --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms070009010202000007090903-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 17:36:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1E4106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:36:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C168FC19 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so1395787wib.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:36:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.96.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.96.8; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.96.8 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ml@my.gd Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.96.8]) by 10.180.96.8 with SMTP id do8mr20926078wib.21.1330364175166 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:36:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.96.8 with SMTP id do8mr16501430wib.21.1330364175006; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:36:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bg3sm23246292wib.10.2012.02.27.09.36.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:36:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4BBF0C.3080206@my.gd> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:36:12 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl4+/IfLstVWbp6EJ+lFIQUtYHmtLnb3vMohrcBsfC8EXEBPDBz8dBf5ibdViZYu8MUo3Yp Subject: Re: Cloning a FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:36:16 -0000 On 2/27/12 5:54 PM, Stephen Cook wrote: > Hello all! > > I'm relatively new to FreeBSD but I'm enjoying it so far. > > I have FreeBSD 9.0 installed as a VirtualBox guest, and I plan on > cloning it repeatedly to set up a fake network for me to toy with (e.g. > setting up clusters of replicated databases, web server pools, etc). [snip] > 3) Create new SSH keys > 3a) For host keys, I can delete the existing ones in /etc/ssh/ and > reboot, is there a better way? > 3b) Should I bother changing the SSH keys for any users I have? It > is basically one user (I use to log in with) which will be the same > across the board anyway. > Why bother changing keys if this is only a "fake network for you to toy with" ? Let them be. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 17:47:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81162106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:47:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@growveg.net) Received: from smtp1.servage.net (smtp1.servage.net [IPv6:2a01:3b0:1:fb:1::2001]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCF58FC1C for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:47:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.60.16.28] (internet-gw-1.demon.net [194.221.40.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp1.servage.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D83D32541 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:09:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F4BC1B3.3050202@growveg.net> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:47:31 +0000 From: John User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 ThunderBrowse/3.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: odd SDcard behaviour in freebsd-9.0-R X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:47:36 -0000 Hi list, I recently upgraded from 8.2-R to 9.0-R via freebsd-update and noticed different behaviour when I plug in my Nikon D50 via the usb port. I'm using the generic kernel while I try to sort this. It is the same in all but identity. 8.2 behaviour used to create a device /dev/da(x)s1 depending on what else was also connected to the USB subsystem. Typically the system would see the card whilst it was still in the camera as /dev/da5s1 and I could then mount it with mount_msdosfs. 9.0 behaviour just shows the following in /var/log/messages: Feb 26 09:18:02 potato kernel: ugen4.6: at usbus4 Feb 26 09:18:02 potato kernel: umass2: on usbus4 Feb 26 09:18:02 potato kernel: umass2: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x4100 Feb 26 09:18:02 potato kernel: umass2:5:2:-1: Attached to scbus5 and nothing corresponding to the device in /dev What am I doing wrong? thanks, -- freebsd at growveg dot net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 17:55:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3456106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:55:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D57B8FC17 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:55:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc7 with SMTP id wc7so752752obb.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:55:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kudzu@tenebras.com designates 10.182.121.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.182.121.101; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kudzu@tenebras.com designates 10.182.121.101 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kudzu@tenebras.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.182.121.101]) by 10.182.121.101 with SMTP id lj5mr5583683obb.39.1330365312056 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:55:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.121.101 with SMTP id lj5mr4958974obb.39.1330365311921; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:55:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.49.164 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:55:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F4BC1B3.3050202@growveg.net> References: <4F4BC1B3.3050202@growveg.net> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:55:11 -0800 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: John Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnKJPFhTlPwO0gi57Jw+U641/q0KydpMy2qd5YShcvvUfYdMeRT6tOTcSIkuIBAMrglZHH+ Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: odd SDcard behaviour in freebsd-9.0-R X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:55:12 -0000 Forgive the naive question, but on one of my Nikons, it is possible to present the device itself, or the SD card as a USD drive. Which are you doing? No doubt there is no driver for the D50 in the kernel, but the generic umass driver should handle the device. On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:47 AM, John wrote: > Hi list, > > I recently upgraded from 8.2-R to 9.0-R via freebsd-update and noticed > different behaviour when I plug in my Nikon D50 via the usb port. I'm > using the generic kernel while I try to sort this. It is the same in all > but identity. > > 8.2 behaviour used to create a device /dev/da(x)s1 depending on what > else was also connected to the USB subsystem. Typically the system would > see the card whilst it was still in the camera as /dev/da5s1 and I could > then mount it with mount_msdosfs. > > 9.0 behaviour just shows the following in /var/log/messages: > > Feb 26 09:18:02 potato kernel: ugen4.6: at usbus4 > Feb 26 09:18:02 potato kernel: umass2: rev 2.00/1.00, addr 6> on usbus4 > Feb 26 09:18:02 potato kernel: umass2: =A0SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks =3D= 0x4100 > Feb 26 09:18:02 potato kernel: umass2:5:2:-1: Attached to scbus5 > > and nothing corresponding to the device in /dev > > What am I doing wrong? > > thanks, > -- > freebsd at growveg dot net > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 18:05:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8DD0106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:05:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770608FC17 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so1419916wib.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:05:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of amvandemore@gmail.com designates 10.216.133.9 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.216.133.9; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of amvandemore@gmail.com designates 10.216.133.9 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=amvandemore@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=amvandemore@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.216.133.9]) by 10.216.133.9 with SMTP id p9mr1487547wei.9.1330365946492 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:05:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=d+aYEBTDnIGZJI5GrVP0RDPcmAPmcR2eSJK7uqY0mRY=; b=HhO5UdhNisIdFDVpb4pP3m5ZtLwGcAvvE8TJq9Ktr0zDShOQNhKenWQA2kmd8CJCXR maxTJHNI5rGCd0WUo7slYrIZvN4rlJTZzaWt/ELkoO+plDrgha/DYc2JKglgU/K1T48I 9gfQseAnofXgV0I07a5pu7m8zepIg59g/W0yw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.133.9 with SMTP id p9mr1168032wei.9.1330365946434; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:05:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.93.138 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:05:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> References: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:05:46 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Stephen Cook Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cloning a FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:05:48 -0000 On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Stephen Cook wrote: > > 2a) I saw (on the internet) some people having problems because > VirtualBox generates a new MAC address for cloned "machines", which somehow > screws up the naming of the network interfaces (e.g. they get renumbered, > thereby ignoring any configuration you have set up). Now I can't find it > anymore, at least not for FreeBSD. Some Linux forums have info about > "/etc/udev/rules.d/70-**persistent-net.rules" which doesn't exist in > FreeBSD as far as I can tell. Is this a concern? I don't seem to be having > a problem but TBH I'd rather understand what is going on than just be lucky. > You can set the MAC address statically in the VB machine. I don't know if it changes it by cloning a system, but even if it does you can change to what you want even with the GUI tools. FreeBSD doesn't use udev, and you should be thankful for it. What a nightmare when you want to do advanced things with your NIC's. What I'm guessing your reading about are people who have multiple nic's in the Vbox guest, and upon cloning mac addresses are changed for the devices. Since Linux device detection doesn't enumerate things the same way each time they created udev so devices would appear to have this. Well as you've seen evidence of, this doesn't work so well when tryin to script things on unknown devices. All this trouble to save a few seconds of boot time. > 3) Create new SSH keys > 3a) For host keys, I can delete the existing ones in /etc/ssh/ and > reboot, is there a better way? > ssh-keygen(1) is the typical method. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 18:19:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CBC106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from artifexor@gmail.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79178FC24 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc7 with SMTP id wc7so785965obb.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:19:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of artifexor@gmail.com designates 10.60.5.231 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.60.5.231; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of artifexor@gmail.com designates 10.60.5.231 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=artifexor@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=artifexor@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.60.5.231]) by 10.60.5.231 with SMTP id v7mr2628436oev.50.1330366741183 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:19:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=SainG0breKD+wStPycw8PtryDE/GxMRC8c3E49KFDJI=; b=PmbdgmlBTG8W9IEbu7Yq6aU+aHttyP/PPO5QhnjCQP8KQJDYXW+EGz7+awxf0BS+Vq GLkKDAKh+5mD45+xTt/9g5h2BiFWSIrQ112SH5uaVuoBIfKji1zUPrPh3q8KazS8GIKd Rc0yi4SIpO9cHSjMIPnfr/EAOKRJ0AppFyIUo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.5.231 with SMTP id v7mr2327997oev.50.1330366741117; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:19:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.15.161 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:19:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201202260003.q1Q035OW083472@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201202260003.q1Q035OW083472@fire.js.berklix.net> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:19:00 +0100 Message-ID: From: Artifex Maximus To: "Julian H. Stacey" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: clang vs gcc linking problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:19:02 -0000 On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Artifex Maximus wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Absolutely not a flame war but would like to switch to clang in a > > project. Project uses ncurses. gcc works well but the executable fails > > when compiled other than -O0. Then I think I should change to clang > > which will becomes the default compiler in FreeBSD. With clang at > > linking time I got the following error: > > > > /usr/local/bin/ld: display/libsub_display.a(canvas.o): undefined > > reference to symbol 'keypad' > > /usr/local/bin/ld: note: 'keypad' is defined in DSO > > /usr/local/lib/libtinfow.so.6.0 so try adding it to the linker command > > line > > /usr/local/lib/libtinfow.so.6.0: could not read symbols: Invalid > operation > > clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see > invocation) > > *** Error code 1 > > > > With exactly the same flags gcc links successful. Any idea where is > > the problem and what is the solution? > > > > Thanks, > > There have been quite a number of discussions on Gcc & Clang > of various lists since efforts to transition started, > I don't see a specific list here, > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo > but this may interest > http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang > Thanks. I did not found any related information on link but finally found a solution. I have to add -ltinfo to LDFLAGS. I still do not know why gcc works without and why clang needs that. Bye, a From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 18:21:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA911065672 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:21:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8C98FC12 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werl4 with SMTP id l4so994081wer.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:21:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.107.6 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.107.6; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.107.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ml@my.gd Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.107.6]) by 10.180.107.6 with SMTP id gy6mr12846439wib.16.1330366867187 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:21:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.107.6 with SMTP id gy6mr10081482wib.16.1330366867132; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:21:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k6sm8682861wiy.7.2012.02.27.10.21.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:21:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4BC990.7050100@my.gd> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:21:04 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" References: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlM7mk0IrMSGC/kF2AloLTksIZedASBWuSUzi/Djc5EA5d0iGJtVpElDkgQKI4fDC/7IV/u Cc: Subject: Re: Cloning a FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:21:08 -0000 On 2/27/12 7:05 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Stephen Cook wrote: > >> 3) Create new SSH keys >> 3a) For host keys, I can delete the existing ones in /etc/ssh/ and >> reboot, is there a better way? >> > > ssh-keygen(1) is the typical method. > Or just delete the existing keys and sshd will recreate them at first boot ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 18:24:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96550106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:24:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A86B8FC12 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenq7 with SMTP id q7so504909yen.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:24:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kraduk@gmail.com designates 10.236.155.6 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.155.6; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kraduk@gmail.com designates 10.236.155.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kraduk@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=kraduk@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.155.6]) by 10.236.155.6 with SMTP id i6mr22688355yhk.87.1330367070672 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:24:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MCo0W/FHo/k1vHw/00aMy8vYZrT46sXSy+ElO7OM5DQ=; b=CGGbnMsJP0v8apWaWrESatzhUgh45nGv8TINFHCZIqfYg7g3cjmnlcoP4AeYHIir16 Nfn/VwbWDUz71n+oWuptGSc0NTBp1sV/Rc/4i29Y84PhZD+1GNqUpejKI3cMtto+KiB0 UtEVee2YoJ6bxAcZnWkByqd2zVGgtHl+zkE2o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.155.6 with SMTP id i6mr16980418yhk.87.1330367070618; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:24:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.179.74 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:24:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20120221223323.a3ccc492.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:24:30 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Polytropon , User Questions Subject: Re: Current way of downloading sources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:24:31 -0000 csup -h cvsup.your_country.freebsd.org/usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supf= ile works for ports as well 2012/2/21 Fernando Apestegu=EDa > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at -h10:33 PM, Polytropon wrote: > > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:18:41 +0100, Fernando Apestegu=EDa wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Before 9.0 I used to use sysinstall to download sources for several > > > distributions including kernel and libraries. However, this doesn't > seem > > to > > > work anymore. Whatever source distribution I try to download I get th= e > > > error that it doesn't exist in the server. > > > > > > The handbook[1] still says sysinstall can be used to do the job. Is i= t > > > right? If so, what could be my mistake. > > > > The easiest way to get the RELEASE sources is to download > > them using FTP: > > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/9.0-RELEASE/src.txz > > > > (and for amd64 architecture respectively) > > > > Leaving the discussion "old vs. new installer" aside, this > > method should always work. > > > > Thanks for the URL. Should I file a PR about the handbook issue? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Polytropon > > Magdeburg, Germany > > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 18:25:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37E810656AE for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:25:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8758FC15 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:25:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc7 with SMTP id wc7so795015obb.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:25:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kudzu@tenebras.com designates 10.182.1.104 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.182.1.104; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kudzu@tenebras.com designates 10.182.1.104 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kudzu@tenebras.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.182.1.104]) by 10.182.1.104 with SMTP id 8mr5655775obl.19.1330367115024 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:25:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.1.104 with SMTP id 8mr5021235obl.19.1330367114958; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:25:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.49.164 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:25:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F4BC990.7050100@my.gd> References: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> <4F4BC990.7050100@my.gd> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:25:14 -0800 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: Damien Fleuriot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmC6yPlPwNAweJywJuoIO7fl9ccfveEAGSVTuV+KjPLT+OiHaLPm02d08WsRNMs53NFKcrc Cc: Adam Vande More , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Cloning a FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:25:15 -0000 On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> ssh-keygen(1) is the typical method. >> > > Or just delete the existing keys and sshd will recreate them at first > boot ;) No, sshd will not create the keys. They are created by /etc/rc.d/sshd, which invokes ssh-keygen if it doesn't find the key files. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 19:21:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2462B106566C; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:21:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward7.mail.yandex.net (forward7.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:202::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258428FC13; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:21:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp9.mail.yandex.net (smtp9.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.35]) by forward7.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id B80361C1268; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:21:25 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1330370485; bh=KDXtPOSBCz75PQqwvcZrhyc0BhlbFqe0gaNlpyfwff0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=CRrOweK595qxU/ZHlDYL1x5qhegP1LwDBJhvdnk/Vrs4KmCk18eszdoZn/7JJ0XZJ +i2uCxxots4NEinmv72hsL7GoE0ARVnj5HyB4louqh95AGVtx5Vw+WfkHuXpjmKnoU mMgV3flqPPCTYNuShiO+VVMVvSikfDRbmleId4hk= Received: from smtp9.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp9.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 92C0515203C8; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:21:25 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1330370485; bh=KDXtPOSBCz75PQqwvcZrhyc0BhlbFqe0gaNlpyfwff0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=CRrOweK595qxU/ZHlDYL1x5qhegP1LwDBJhvdnk/Vrs4KmCk18eszdoZn/7JJ0XZJ +i2uCxxots4NEinmv72hsL7GoE0ARVnj5HyB4louqh95AGVtx5Vw+WfkHuXpjmKnoU mMgV3flqPPCTYNuShiO+VVMVvSikfDRbmleId4hk= Received: from unknown (unknown [77.93.52.20]) by smtp9.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id LOKWwdfL-LPKWMYod; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:21:25 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:21:37 +0200 From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: =?windows-1251?B?188gyu7t/Oru4iwgRnJlZUxpbmU=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <292119122.20120228212137@yandex.ru> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: netisr traffic bad distribution between CPUs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:21:42 -0000 http://piccy.info/view3/2678766/170dd8875b0a18e00b00445d373e64a6/orig/ http://piccy.info/view3/2678742/4f522bdf95d34e6ddbb3502bb5f5caaf/orig/ abruptly problems 20-00: traffic fall, CPU load raise with no changes at traffice type. but no problems at 17-00 even with more traffice flow problem also abruptly disappears after some time: two or three hours # netstat -Q Configuration: Setting Current Limit Thread count 4 4 Default queue limit 256 10240 Direct dispatch disabled n/a Forced direct dispatch disabled n/a Threads bound to CPUs disabled n/a Protocols: Name Proto QLimit Policy Flags ip 1 1024 flow --- igmp 2 256 source --- rtsock 3 256 source --- arp 7 256 source --- ip6 10 256 flow --- Workstreams: WSID CPU Name Len WMark Disp'd HDisp'd QDrops Queued Handled 0 0 ip 401 1024 0 0 2620979 2131108484 2131107410 0 0 igmp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rtsock 0 162 0 0 0 78610 78610 0 0 arp 0 9 0 0 0 189978 189978 0 0 ip6 0 2 0 0 0 832 832 1 1 ip 0 744 0 0 0 805541655 805541655 1 1 igmp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 rtsock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 arp 0 4 0 0 0 96599 96599 1 1 ip6 0 1 0 0 0 2602 2602 2 2 ip 25 1024 0 0 8173 1817809104 1817809050 2 2 igmp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 rtsock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 arp 0 20 0 0 0 278757 278757 2 2 ip6 0 1 0 0 0 1095 1095 3 3 ip 82 1024 0 0 187757 1551553992 1551553909 3 3 igmp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 rtsock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 arp 0 8 0 0 0 562346 562346 3 3 ip6 0 3 0 0 0 10843 10843 FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #4: Fri Jun 10 01:30:12 UTC 2011 @:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PAE_KES i386 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 19:52:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D20106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris_bender@cellularatsea.com) Received: from wireless.icgws.com (wireless.icgws.com [198.211.94.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7720A8FC0A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 1D012180DDE; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:51:42 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on wireless.icgws.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (unknown [10.200.250.42]) by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EBCD6180DD5; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:51:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 21328B188FF; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:52:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com ([10.200.104.15] helo=wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com) by wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com with SMTP (ASSP 1.9.1.1); 27 Feb 2012 14:52:36 -0500 X-Ninja-PIM: Scanned by Ninja X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message x-vipre-scanned: 10BF5651002D4D10BF579E Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:52:35 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F4BB8B8.509@radel.com> Thread-Topic: Email issues, relay failure Thread-Index: Acz1co+dmWcZVccXRjSUitNuLyJvWwAEulWw References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBAE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48BAF6.9070204@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBE7@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48EC21.7040805@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBEE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48F45F.4080304@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBF4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F492262.5090505@radel.com> <7409DAB4-F76A-493B-9A50-A663E6F6802E@cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFDA4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB61A.1060600@radel.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFDB1@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB8B8.509@radel.com> From: "Bender, Chris" To: "Jon Radel" X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes () X-Assp-Envelope-From: chris_bender@cellularatsea.com X-Assp-Intended-For: jon@radel.com X-Assp-Passing: 10.200.104.15 in acceptAllMail X-Assp-ID: wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (33037-52381) X-Assp-Version: 1.9.1.1(1.0.00) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Email issues, relay failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:52:47 -0000 Hi Joe So from the rules below, I can see my network to and from in tables to . However when pfctl is enabled that traffic fails with .... # tcpdump -ni bge0 host 10.156.81.10 and port 25 =20 tcpdump: listening on bge0, link-type EN10MB 14:26:50.220591 10.156.81.10.60809 > 172.19.4.41.25: S 3154136673:3154136673(0) win 64240 (DF) [tos 0xb8] 14:26:50.244314 10.156.81.10.60809 > 172.19.4.41.25: R 3154136674:3154136735(61) ack 1245040067 win 0 (DF) [tos 0xb8] 14:27:11.233494 10.156.81.10.60809 > 172.19.4.41.25: S 3154136673:3154136673(0) win 64240 (DF) [tos 0xb8] 14:27:11.245057 10.156.81.10.60809 > 172.19.4.41.25: R 0:61(61) ack 1 win 0 (DF) [tos 0xb8] SO from traffic aboveon the inbound interface I can see this failed. OUCH. But I don't know what rule is killing it.=20 Here is table table { 10.200.82.16 , 10.200.104.15 , 172.19.4.41 , 198.211.94.23 } table { 10.13.0.0/21 , 10.13.224.0/21 , 10.13.226.0/23 , 10.150.0.0/16 , 10.156.0.0/16 , 10.158.0.0/16 , 10.166.0.0/16 , 10.196.0.0/16 , 10.198.0 .0/16 , 10.200.104.0/24 , 172.16.0.0/16 , 172.19.4.0/24 , 172.19.11.0/24 , 172.19.20.0/24 , 172.19.50.0/24 , 172.19.51.0/24 , 172.19.52.0/24 , 172.19.53.0/24 , 172.19.100.0/29 , 172.19.231.0/24 , 172.19.232.0/24 , 172.31.0.0/16= } Rest of pf.conf since you asked which I have removed confidential info The key is what is blocking SMTP. I am not sure yet? Thanks # # Prolog script # set loginterface bge0 set state-defaults pflow nat-anchor "ftp-proxy/*" rdr-anchor "ftp-proxy/*" nat-anchor "relayd/*" rdr-anchor "relayd/*" anchor "relayd/*" anchor "ftp-proxy/*" # # End of prolog script # set skip on bridge10 set skip on tun579 set skip on tun138 set skip on tun148 set skip on tun10 set skip on bridge138 set skip on bridge148 # # Scrub rules # match in all scrub (no-df ) match out all scrub (random-id max-mss 1460) # Tables: (26) table persist file "/home/admin/BlackList.txt" table persist file "/home/admin/BlackList-internet.txt" # Rule 0 (global) # BlackList Rule block in log quick inet from to any no state label "RULE 0 -- DROP " block out log quick inet from to any no state label "RULE 0 -- DROP " # # Rule 1 (global) # BlackList Rule block in log quick inet from any to no state label "RULE 1 -- DROP " block out log quick inet from any to no state label "RULE 1 -- DROP " # # Rule 2 (global) # BlackList Servers going to Internet block in log quick inet from to 127.0.0.1 no state label "RULE 2 -- DROP " block out log quick inet from to 127.0.0.1 no state label "RULE 2 -- DROP " # # Rule 3 (bge1) # BlackList Servers going to Internet block out log quick on bge1 inet from to any= no state label "RULE 3 -- DROP " # # Rule 4 (bge1) # BlackList Internet Ports block out log quick on bge1 inet proto tcp from any to any port { 25, 465 } no state label "RULE 4 -- DROP " # # Rule 5 (global) BLOCKED FOR CONFIIDENTIALITY # Rule 6 (bge1,bge0) # FTP Proxy Loopback Pule pass in log quick on { bge0 bge1 } inet proto tcp from any to 127.0.0.1 port 8021 flags any modulate state ( pflow ) label "RULE 6 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 7 (bge0,vlan579) pass in log quick on { bge0 vlan579 } inet proto tcp from to 127.0.0.1 port 2021 flags any modulate state ( pflow ) label "RULE= 7 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 8 (bge0,vlan579) pass in log quick on { bge0 vlan579 } inet proto tcp from to 127.0.0.1 port 3128 flags any modulate state ( pflow ) label "RULE= 8 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 9 (global) pass in log quick inet from any to any tagged FTPPROXY keep state ( pflow ) label "RULE 9 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet from any to any tagged FTPPROXY keep state ( pflow ) label "RULE 9 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 10 (bge1) # Allow ESP, AH, IKE and NAT-T for IPSEC # # Rule 11 (bge1) # BLOCKED FOR CONFIDENTIALITY # # Rule 12 (bge1) # PPTP Traffic BLOCKED FOR CONFIDENTIALITY # # Rule 13 (bge1) # PPTP Traffic BLOCKED FOR CONFIDENTIALITY# # Rule 14 (bge1) # PPTP Traffic pass out log quick on bge1 inet proto 47 from 172.19.231.128/27 to any label "RULE 14 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 15 (global) Blocked for confidentiality # # Rule 16 (bge0) =20 pass in log quick on bge0 inet proto tcp from to 172.19.231.149 port 1723 flags any modulate state label "RULE 16 -- ACCEPT " pass in log quick on bge0 inet proto 47 from to 172.19.231.149 label "RULE 16 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 17 (global) =20 pass in log quick inet from to 10.10.11.0/24 label "RULE 17 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet from to 10.10.11.0/24 label "RULE 17 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 18 (global) =20 pass in log quick inet proto udp from 172.19.231.128/27 to 212.9.21.214 port { 500, 4500 } label "RULE 18 -- ACCEPT " pass in log quick inet proto 50 from 172.19.231.128/27 to 212.9.21.214 label "RULE 18 -- ACCEPT " pass in log quick inet proto 51 from 172.19.231.128/27 to 212.9.21.214 label "RULE 18 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet proto udp from 172.19.231.128/27 to 212.9.21.214 port { 500, 4500 } label "RULE 18 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet proto 50 from 172.19.231.128/27 to 212.9.21.214 label "RULE 18 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet proto 51 from 172.19.231.128/27 to 212.9.21.214 label "RULE 18 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 19 (global) # =20 pass in log quick inet proto udp from 172.19.64.0/24 to 10.13.6.125 port 123 keep state ( pflow ) label "RULE 19 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet proto udp from 172.19.64.0/24 to 10.13.6.125 port 123 keep state ( pflow ) label "RULE 19 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 20 (global) =20 pass in log quick inet proto udp from 172.19.64.0/24 to 172.31.1.6 port 162 keep state ( pflow ) label "RULE 20 -- ACCEPT " pass in log quick inet proto 115 from 172.19.64.0/24 to 172.31.1.6 keep state ( pflow ) label "RULE 20 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet proto udp from 172.19.64.0/24 to 172.31.1.6 port 162 keep state ( pflow ) label "RULE 20 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet proto 115 from 172.19.64.0/24 to 172.31.1.6 keep state ( pflow ) label "RULE 20 -- ACCEPT " # =20 # # state ( pflow ) label "RULE 35 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 36 (global) # Allow ME to Any pass out log quick inet from to any keep state ( pflow= ) label "RULE 36 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 37 (global) # SMTP Servers Access to SMTP pass in log quick inet proto tcp from to any port 25 flags any modulate state ( pflow ) label "RULE 37 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet proto tcp from to any port 25 flags any modulate state ( pflow ) label "RULE 37 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 38 (global) # Access to SMTP Servers pass in log quick inet proto tcp from to port 25 flags any modulate state ( pflow ) label "RULE 38 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet proto tcp from to port 25 flags any modulate state ( pflow ) label "RULE 38 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 39 (global) # Restrict SMTP To Internal Networks block in log quick inet proto tcp from any to port 25 no state label "RULE 39 -- DROP " block out log quick inet proto tcp from any to port 25 no state label "RULE 39 -- DROP " # =20 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 21:24:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7904D106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:24:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253A58FC19 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-185-71.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.185.71]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487651E332; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:24:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q1RLOW4r002675; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:24:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:24:32 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Jerome Herman Message-Id: <20120227222432.8a48a039.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4F4AA428.2010503@dichotomia.fr> References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F498DF0.5070504@dichotomia.fr> <20120226184653.e695327b.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F4AA428.2010503@dichotomia.fr> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:24:35 -0000 On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:29:12 +0100, Jerome Herman wrote: > Not at all, the web admin for adding a printer is basically an html > version of lpadmin. It is just easier with the web site. Easier as in: It leaves _essential_ options aside so that you can't perform some of the tasks. :-) > OK this means the ppd does not handle everything. Might get a little > complicated. When I use the foo2qpdl-wrapper which I assume does use the same PPD file, it works as intended. > They did, then they got bought by Apple... I should make myself more familiar with the command line tool. Still I hope I won't need CUPS anytime soon. :-) > No, please don't blame CUPS, it is earnestly trying to cope with > everything thrown at him (stupid printers, gnome DBus autoconfig, Apple > Mac OSX and so on), and it is doing a fairly good job at it. I know that printing currently isn't as easy as I (with my simple mind) assume. I've been using CUPS in the _past_ without major trouble, and even "impossible" things (like using parallel dotmatrix printers) were easily configurable even through the web interface. Seems that some parts got disimproved to please a certain audience... > I for one > do not want to go back to the time where one had to learn 2 lines long > LPD command just to print in color, double side, with an ICM profile. I have several printers for varying _how_ to print. However, I like the idea of selecting duplex / no duplex in the printing dialog (which I currently do by selecting a different "virtual" printer: Laserjet = b/w two-sided, Laserjet-nodup = b/w single-sided, Samsung = color single-sided). > Getting back to your problem. Apparently you are using an old version of > foo2qpdl, you may want to grab it from the web site directly and compile > it by hand (One of the very rare case where using the default > package/port is not a good idea at all) > You can find the howto here : http://foo2qpdl.rkkda.com/ > You will need to download and link the ICM profile to have acceptable > print quality. The latest PPD is 24 874 bytes in size. I will try that. I have installed the packages foo2zjs-20110609 foomatic-db-20090530_2 foomatic-db-engine-4.0.7,2 gutenprint-foomatic-5.2.4_2 where foo2qpdl and foo2qpdl-wrapper come from. I'm happy that I now have the "fallback method" of stopping CUPS, starting lpd, and using -PSamsung in order to use the color printer (not often required, it's my _first_ one, I've never needed one, really). Using a Linksys Wireless-G WPS54GU2 print server (WLAN, LAN, USB, parallel) - following Jerry's suggestion - I'll try tp get rid of the USB cable at the next step. Wireless printing isn't urgently needed (as I'm happily wired here), but real networking is much better than this local fiddling with USB (so I can print to the color printer from all of my systems when it's _real_ networked, just as the HP Laserjet 4000d which even runs its own lpd "server"). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 21:59:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927691065678 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:59:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A8B8FC0A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk4 with SMTP id k4so1405006ggn.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:59:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.197.103 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.197.103; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.197.103 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jerry@seibercom.net Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.197.103]) by 10.236.197.103 with SMTP id s67mr24946039yhn.5.1330379965724 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:59:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.197.103 with SMTP id s67mr18773723yhn.5.1330379965661; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:59:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h21sm25275881ann.1.2012.02.27.13.59.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:59:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3TxcQ31qqKz2CG4D for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:59:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:59:22 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120227165922.523834ec@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120227222432.8a48a039.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F498DF0.5070504@dichotomia.fr> <20120226184653.e695327b.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F4AA428.2010503@dichotomia.fr> <20120227222432.8a48a039.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlRQIXStgxV0qI4chqarC+o1QqNZw0QCcObDosYcxAAPmrVgqOIjqORImAiHv8GvbMMoE4E Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:59:26 -0000 On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:24:32 +0100 Polytropon articulated: > Using a Linksys Wireless-G WPS54GU2 print server (WLAN, LAN, > USB, parallel) - following Jerry's suggestion - I'll try tp > get rid of the USB cable at the next step. I spoke to an associate yesterday who claims he used a USB to Ethernet adapter on an older Canon printer and it worked fine. Everything was detected automatically. Obviously, that was on a Windows machine, WinXP to be exact. I still think it should work on FreeBSD although it will undoubtedly need a lot more user intervention. The router was a Netgate wireless model. He did not remember which model. Good luck! -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 22:16:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC716106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:16:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rbanfield@weogeo.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1AA8FC0A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by daec6 with SMTP id c6so3752664dae.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:16:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rbanfield@weogeo.com designates 10.68.240.135 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.240.135; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rbanfield@weogeo.com designates 10.68.240.135 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rbanfield@weogeo.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.240.135]) by 10.68.240.135 with SMTP id wa7mr45367136pbc.7.1330381003354 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:16:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.240.135 with SMTP id wa7mr38082695pbc.7.1330379532793; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:52:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (pool-72-91-240-41.tampfl.fios.verizon.net. [72.91.240.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s1sm13718762pbs.21.2012.02.27.13.52.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:52:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4BFB09.9090002@weogeo.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:52:09 -0500 From: Robert Banfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnMY3F3Vsu0yDJh0XD3otVDLgypSqW/k38kBNcLm4EqWX760CfJKh7ZYGNXk1QEi1TwMMq2 Subject: "find" not traversing all directories on a single zfs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:16:43 -0000 Summary: I am executing the command "find . > ../file_list" and it is not traversing all the subdirectories it encounters along the way. There is no separate file system mounted along the path. Long version: I'm new to FreeBSD and ZFS (many years of linux experience though), so my apologies if I'm missing something straightforward here. This is a tile server which has tens of millions of mostly small files. I'm logged in as root, and there is no networked file system anywhere in the mix. I'm using the version of find installed with FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE amd64. cd /zfs_mount_point/mydir find . &> ../file_list I would presume that file_list contains a list of every file and directory inside of /zfs_mount_point/mydir, however some directories contain only the directory entry without any of the file and subdirectories it contains. As an example, file_list contains: ./dataset_tiles ./dataset_tiles/token1 ./dataset_tiles/token1/kml ./dataset_tiles/token1/kml/kml.png ./dataset_tiles/token2 ./dataset_tiles/token3 ./dataset_tiles/token3/kml ... The problem is "./dataset_tiles/token2" is a directory, and none of its entries appear anywhere in the file_list. Yet if I do the following: find ./dataset_tiles/token2 I get a list of everything that I would expect to have been in file_list, but did not. "ls -l" shows the entry type character as 'd'. token2 is just a subdirectory of dataset_tiles, not a separate mount point. I should have all the requisite permissions to access the files in that directory, and I can run find successfully if I specify any of the directories which do not seem to be working. Here's an actual 'ls -ld' on one of the directories not working: ls -ld 967c4f32-8a9e-0459-8e94-c911e41be43b/ drwxr-xr-x 10 root wheel 10 Feb 4 21:45 967c4f32-8a9e-0459-8e94-c911e41be43b/ The only other tidbit of information I can think to add is I also tried running "find -d ." with no overall change in output other than the order the directories were searched. Any idea what's going on? Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 22:52:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A92106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:52:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jherman@dichotomia.fr) Received: from mail.dichotomia.fr (hydrogen.dichotomia.net [91.121.82.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6368FC1B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:52:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.11] (unknown [109.190.13.180]) (Authenticated sender: kha@dichotomia.fr) by sslmail.dichotomia.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DC563DD07B; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:52:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F4C08F0.90906@dichotomia.fr> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:51:28 +0100 From: Jerome Herman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F498DF0.5070504@dichotomia.fr> <20120226184653.e695327b.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F4AA428.2010503@dichotomia.fr> <20120227222432.8a48a039.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120227222432.8a48a039.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (sslmail.dichotomia.fr); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:52:00 +0100 (CET) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:52:31 -0000 On 27/02/2012 22:24, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:29:12 +0100, Jerome Herman wrote: >> Not at all, the web admin for adding a printer is basically an html >> version of lpadmin. It is just easier with the web site. > Easier as in: It leaves _essential_ options aside so that > you can't perform some of the tasks. :-) Technically speaking, it doesn't leaves essential options aside, it just forgets to mention them. But I get your point. > > > >> OK this means the ppd does not handle everything. Might get a little >> complicated. > When I use the foo2qpdl-wrapper which I assume does use > the same PPD file, it works as intended. Nope, the wrapper is just used to convert ps to QPDL in a plain file. The PPD does a lot more, including a bit of dialog with the printer to make sure it is configured correctly. Most of the time it also helps handling different parameters such as paper size and orientation, color or B&W etc. > > > >> They did, then they got bought by Apple... > I should make myself more familiar with the command line > tool. Still I hope I won't need CUPS anytime soon. :-) > > > >> No, please don't blame CUPS, it is earnestly trying to cope with >> everything thrown at him (stupid printers, gnome DBus autoconfig, Apple >> Mac OSX and so on), and it is doing a fairly good job at it. > I know that printing currently isn't as easy as I (with > my simple mind) assume. I've been using CUPS in the _past_ > without major trouble, and even "impossible" things (like > using parallel dotmatrix printers) were easily configurable > even through the web interface. Seems that some parts got > disimproved to please a certain audience... Well Apple way of handling devices : if it doesn't work the way we want, it doesn't exist. > > > >> I for one >> do not want to go back to the time where one had to learn 2 lines long >> LPD command just to print in color, double side, with an ICM profile. > I have several printers for varying _how_ to print. However, > I like the idea of selecting duplex / no duplex in the > printing dialog (which I currently do by selecting a different > "virtual" printer: Laserjet = b/w two-sided, Laserjet-nodup = > b/w single-sided, Samsung = color single-sided). Normally that is what PPD is for, giving you a bit of control on all those parameters, so you do not have to create dozens of config per printer. (This said quite a lot of my users love to have dozens of configure for one printer, even under windows and mac. They prefer choosing a printer called Graphic_A3_Color_2side than having to choose options themselves) > > >> Getting back to your problem. Apparently you are using an old version of >> foo2qpdl, you may want to grab it from the web site directly and compile >> it by hand (One of the very rare case where using the default >> package/port is not a good idea at all) >> You can find the howto here : http://foo2qpdl.rkkda.com/ >> You will need to download and link the ICM profile to have acceptable >> print quality. The latest PPD is 24 874 bytes in size. > I will try that. I have installed the packages > > foo2zjs-20110609 > foomatic-db-20090530_2 > foomatic-db-engine-4.0.7,2 > gutenprint-foomatic-5.2.4_2 > > where foo2qpdl and foo2qpdl-wrapper come from. > > I'm happy that I now have the "fallback method" of stopping > CUPS, starting lpd, and using -PSamsung in order to use the > color printer (not often required, it's my _first_ one, I've > never needed one, really). > > Using a Linksys Wireless-G WPS54GU2 print server (WLAN, LAN, > USB, parallel) - following Jerry's suggestion - I'll try tp > get rid of the USB cable at the next step. Wireless printing > isn't urgently needed (as I'm happily wired here), but real > networking is much better than this local fiddling with USB > (so I can print to the color printer from all of my systems > when it's _real_ networked, just as the HP Laserjet 4000d > which even runs its own lpd "server"). On small printers, nothing beats socket connections. But the USB to ethernet transform can be quite tricky sometimes. Usually QPDL is well supported, it is after all a real interpreter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 22:53:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E475106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:53:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD3A8FC0C for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1RMrA4a051576 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:53:10 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q1RMrA4a051576 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1330383190; bh=cgGitw8UY0h6q/hcrRb7cNGZdfkgBKGCuRr4dub74Xk=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=FKknQK+hzxGSadGB3ENZVewgFxJ8z/wL5hrjfzyUtqFzT0lc6FKrptOR+UhC9gGLR qZsyKE76yo6TnWItiby+TgjqNWs2bzcqUEriW95j73lsZ13ULZYb5YcgOH00ldtM2H 0DK9YpNPpV2zlcgdCrcRo3hF+yfTCFm3s5+79O/E= Message-ID: <4F4C094C.1010900@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:53:00 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4BFB09.9090002@weogeo.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4BFB09.9090002@weogeo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE0BD73882A3371C489855253" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: "find" not traversing all directories on a single zfs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:53:15 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE0BD73882A3371C489855253 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 27/02/2012 21:52, Robert Banfield wrote: > Long version: I'm new to FreeBSD and ZFS (many years of linux > experience though), so my apologies if I'm missing something > straightforward here. This is a tile server which has tens of millions= > of mostly small files. I'm logged in as root, and there is no networke= d > file system anywhere in the mix. I'm using the version of find > installed with FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE amd64. >=20 > cd /zfs_mount_point/mydir > find . &> ../file_list >=20 > I would presume that file_list contains a list of every file and > directory inside of /zfs_mount_point/mydir, however some directories > contain only the directory entry without any of the file and > subdirectories it contains. These are all actual directories -- no symbolic link or anything like that? I assume permissions are not the problem? All directories have at least mode r_x for your user id? (Hmmm... but you are logged in as root -- can't be that then.) How about ACLs? Are you using those at all on your filesystem? The symptoms you are observing are definitely incorrect, and not at all what the vast majority of find(1) users would experience. Something is definitely a bit fubar on your machine. It would be useful to try and establish if it is the find(1) program giving bogus results, or whether it is some other part of the system. Do other methods of printing out the filesystem contents suffer from the same problem -- eg. 'ls -R .' or 'tar -cvf /dev/null .' Is there anything in the system log or printed on the console? (Note: I always find it useful to enable the console.log and all.log by uncommenting the relevant lines in /etc/syslog.conf and following the other instructions there.) Also, is this 9.0-RELEASE straight from the installation media, or did you compile it yourself? If you compiled it yourself, what compiler did you use (gcc or clang)? What optimization and what architecture settings -- trying to tweak such things for maximum optimization frequently leads to dissapointment. If you installed onto ZFS, what procedure did you follow, given that bsdinstall doesn't have that capability yet? Was it by following one of the well-known recipes like http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot = ? Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigE0BD73882A3371C489855253 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9MCVUACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzPGgCfZSsXewibxHTchp4XQDT1b8oA cPYAn01M7J5yTjA7SY3fATaSX4871JmC =eUY7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE0BD73882A3371C489855253-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 01:11:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE00106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:11:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from czsq888@163.com) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790BF8FC14 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2BIu-0005Ge-0H for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:52:32 -0800 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:52:32 -0800 (PST) From: sw2wolf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:11:58 -0000 >uname -a FreeBSD mybsd.zsoft.com 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #3: Fri Sep 30 15:23:56 CST 2011 =20 root@mybsd.zsoft.com:/media/G/usr/obj/media/G/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386 I am using 8.2 for a long time. And it works VERY well. Any suggestion is appreciated! ----- e^(=CF=80.i) + 1 =3D 0 -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Is-it-wo= rthy-upgrading-to-9-0-tp5520494p5520494.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 01:38:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2927B106566C for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:38:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikes@siralan.org) Received: from mail.suso.org (mail.suso.org [66.244.94.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FBF8FC13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-98-223-201-170.hsd1.in.comcast.net (c-98-223-201-170.hsd1.in.comcast.net [98.223.201.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.suso.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE76138222 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:38:48 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:37:20 -0500 (EST) From: "Michael L. Squires" X-X-Sender: mikes@familysquires.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <292119122.20120228212137@yandex.ru> Message-ID: References: <292119122.20120228212137@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Installing amanda 3.2 from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:38:50 -0000 I'm in the process of installing amanda 3.2 (misc/amanda-server) using ports with an Overland AIT-3 library as the storage medium. So far I haven't had a problem with going through the "Build a Basic Configuration" instructions on wiki.zmanda.com. I did have to create a different "amanda" login entry which allowed for "su - amanda" in order to follow the instructions (using "su - amanda"). The server is running 8.3-PRERELEASE/amd64 at this point; the clients will be a CENTOS 6.2 server, a FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE client, and three XP SP3 PCs. I will eventually try to add a Mac client. If there's anyone who's done this before, especially 3.x, and who has words of wisdom I'd very much appreciate the information. Mike Squires mikes at siralan.org UN*X at home since 1986 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 02:21:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4D5106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:21:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rbanfield@weogeo.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D91C8FC14 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:21:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so538019pbc.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:21:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rbanfield@weogeo.com designates 10.68.225.129 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.225.129; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rbanfield@weogeo.com designates 10.68.225.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rbanfield@weogeo.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.225.129]) by 10.68.225.129 with SMTP id rk1mr2061926pbc.51.1330395710119 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:21:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.225.129 with SMTP id rk1mr1692049pbc.51.1330395709982; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:21:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (pool-72-91-240-41.tampfl.fios.verizon.net. [72.91.240.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f9sm14259170pbq.60.2012.02.27.18.21.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:21:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4C3A3A.9080903@weogeo.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:21:46 -0500 From: Robert Banfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4BFB09.9090002@weogeo.com> <4F4C094C.1010900@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4F4C094C.1010900@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnENfBsD2ARZEwvB47HIRp0YTR6G9JPIMMN4d+JeMEpd+46xHdL4dZWB6BZVINf6gtxg9vW Subject: Re: "find" not traversing all directories on a single zfs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:21:50 -0000 On 02/27/2012 05:53 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > These are all actual directories -- no symbolic link or anything like > that? I assume permissions are not the problem? All directories have > at least mode r_x for your user id? (Hmmm... but you are logged in as > root -- can't be that then.) How about ACLs? Are you using those at > all on your filesystem? There are no symbolic links, nor any ACLs at all anywhere on the system. All the directories have rwx for root, and permissions are not a problem. > The symptoms you are observing are definitely incorrect, and not at all > what the vast majority of find(1) users would experience. Something is > definitely a bit fubar on your machine. It would be useful to try and > establish if it is the find(1) program giving bogus results, or whether > it is some other part of the system. Do other methods of printing out > the filesystem contents suffer from the same problem -- eg. 'ls -R .' or > 'tar -cvf /dev/null .' ls -R appears to be traversing all subdirectories. > Is there anything in the system log or printed > on the console? (Note: I always find it useful to enable the > console.log and all.log by uncommenting the relevant lines in > /etc/syslog.conf and following the other instructions there.) da0 runs the operating system. da1-12 are set up as a RAIDZ2 with 2 hot spares. # zpool status pool: tank0 state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk1 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk2 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk3 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk4 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk5 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk6 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk7 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk8 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk9 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk10 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares label/zfsdisk11 AVAIL label/zfsdisk12 AVAIL # glabel status Name Status Components gptid/d49367f4-5cfc-11e1-be4b-000423b4b110 N/A da0p1 label/zfsdisk1 N/A da1 label/zfsdisk2 N/A da2 label/zfsdisk3 N/A da3 label/zfsdisk4 N/A da4 label/zfsdisk5 N/A da5 label/zfsdisk6 N/A da6 label/zfsdisk7 N/A da7 label/zfsdisk8 N/A da8 label/zfsdisk9 N/A da9 label/zfsdisk10 N/A da10 label/zfsdisk11 N/A da11 label/zfsdisk12 N/A da12 These messages appear in the output of dmesg: GEOM: da1: the primary GPT table is corrupt or invalid. GEOM: da1: using the secondary instead -- recovery strongly advised. (repeat for da2 - da12) GEOM: da1: corrupt or invalid GPT detected. GEOM: da1: GPT rejected -- may not be recoverable. GEOM: da1: corrupt or invalid GPT detected. GEOM: da1: GPT rejected -- may not be recoverable. (repeat for da2-da12) GEOM: label/zfsdisk1: corrupt or invalid GPT detected. GEOM: label/zfsdisk1: GPT rejected -- may not be recoverable. Could this be related, or a separate issue? > Also, is this 9.0-RELEASE straight from the installation media, or did > you compile it yourself? If you compiled it yourself, what compiler did > you use (gcc or clang)? What optimization and what architecture > settings -- trying to tweak such things for maximum optimization > frequently leads to dissapointment. This is straight from the 64-bit memstick install. I have used both the standard install /usr/bin/find as well as a compiled /usr/src/usr.bin/find/ and both give the same results. I have no tweaks for zfs other than to zfs_enable on boot. Because this machine has 16GB of RAM, I believe prefetch is automatically enabled. I have some additional information that I didnt see before actually digging into the log file. It is quite interesting. There are 82,206 subdirectories in one of the folders. Like this: /zfs_mount/directoryA/token[1-82206]/various_tileset_files When looking at the output of find, here is what I see: Lines 1-9996943: The output of find, good as good can be Lines 9996944-10062479: Subdirectory entries only, it traversed none of them. Notice 10062479-9996944+1 = 65536 = 2^16 So, of the 82206 subdirectories, the first 82206-2^16 were traversed, and the final 2^16 were not. The plot thickens... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 03:24:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5348D106566B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:24:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rbanfield@weogeo.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236F48FC15 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by daec6 with SMTP id c6so4012941dae.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:24:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rbanfield@weogeo.com designates 10.68.135.10 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.135.10; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rbanfield@weogeo.com designates 10.68.135.10 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rbanfield@weogeo.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.135.10]) by 10.68.135.10 with SMTP id po10mr44173983pbb.121.1330399470851 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:24:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.135.10 with SMTP id po10mr37289661pbb.121.1330399470693; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:24:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (pool-72-91-240-41.tampfl.fios.verizon.net. [72.91.240.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f8sm14409210pbe.42.2012.02.27.19.24.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:24:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4C48EB.8070106@weogeo.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:24:27 -0500 From: Robert Banfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4BFB09.9090002@weogeo.com> <4F4C094C.1010900@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4F4C3A3A.9080903@weogeo.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4C3A3A.9080903@weogeo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkHFLOsl0eNJzmcQ445oedUzJHpEgs6TZv+S4yYKoeQjvQJ0I1LDkRUxMRexjGZivl+zkru Subject: Re: "find" not traversing all directories on a single zfs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:24:31 -0000 On 02/27/2012 09:21 PM, Robert Banfield wrote: > > ls -R appears to be traversing all subdirectories. Scratch that... ls -R fails to traverse the same directories that find does. Is there a subdirectory limit in ZFS? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 04:18:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C998C106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:18:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@growveg.net) Received: from smtp1.servage.net (smtp1.servage.net [IPv6:2a01:3b0:1:fb:1::2001]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA5F8FC08 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:18:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from potato.growveg.org (potato.growveg.org [62.49.247.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp1.servage.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE42C3220D; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F4C55B4.6030808@growveg.net> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:19:00 +0000 From: FreeBSD Mailing Lists User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120226 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Sierchio References: <4F4BC1B3.3050202@growveg.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: odd SDcard behaviour in freebsd-9.0-R X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:18:46 -0000 On 27/02/2012 17:55, Michael Sierchio wrote: > Forgive the naive question, but on one of my Nikons, it is possible to > present the device itself, or the SD card as a USD drive. Which are > you doing? No doubt there is no driver for the D50 in the kernel, but > the generic umass driver should handle the device. Hi, Yes, on freebsd 8.2 the camera has only ever presented itself as storage and it has only ever been the sd card within the camera that has been visible to freebsd. On 9.0 I can see umass output in /var/log/messages but not any corresponding disk descriptor like /dev/da5s1 so I have no way of accessing the sd card. -- freebsd at growveg dot net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 06:50:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667801065670 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:50:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msabramo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F808FC08 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc7 with SMTP id wc7so1629797obb.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:50:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of msabramo@gmail.com designates 10.60.13.1 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.60.13.1; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of msabramo@gmail.com designates 10.60.13.1 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=msabramo@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=msabramo@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.60.13.1]) by 10.60.13.1 with SMTP id d1mr5947424oec.41.1330411832653 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:50:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mpH2wo2J5LhFoSzltxH+gfLUft4tAmZm5UESEjCBTlY=; b=kAW+wgfBM6GMIA3KFJJyNxrFBT0MRbBGn+iE+YINgBAI8nfTTHTrKjLBue6uzbRtXo PFSvEZpZlqYqSfJI2+DwoPtMeGONP7manOSG8KF7U/+0X5IotHvoZU4IIBZHqThfOA/Z LE6yPrlY0x64Y6834FDsPk4+t1CsFSjposSAg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.13.1 with SMTP id d1mr5244407oec.41.1330410137739; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:22:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.24.7 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:22:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:22:17 -0800 Message-ID: From: Marc Abramowitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: DTrace userland X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:50:33 -0000 I'm using FreeBSD 9.0 on amd64 in VMware Fusion and trying to DTrace userland programs. I think I must be doing something wrong. I recompiled my kernel and world, following the instructions at http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace and I've read http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace/userland: The test.c pid provider example worked fine for me: $ sudo dtrace -s pid.d -c ./test dtrace: script 'pid.d' matched 2 probes dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME 0 43030 main:entry 0 43031 sleep:entry 0 43031 sleep:entry 0 43031 sleep:entry As does a simple probe of test.c specified with the -n option: [marca@freebsd9-0 ~]$ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:test:main:entry' -c ./test dtrace: description 'pid$target:test:main:entry' matched 1 probe dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME 0 43030 main:entry When I start trying to dtrace other programs, things don't go so well... $ sudo dtrace -n ":::entry" -c /usr/local/bin/python Python 2.4.5 (#2, Dec 5 2011, 15:19:09) [GCC 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]] on freebsd9 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import os >>> os.getpid() 1603 >>> dtrace: failed to control pid 1603: process exited with status 0 $ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:::entry' -c '/bin/cat hello_world.txt' dtrace: description 'pid$target:::entry' matched 3315 probes dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME 0 43448 _rtld_bind:entry 0 43903 rlock_acquire:entry 0 43125 def_thread_set_flag:entry (Had to hit Ctrl-C to exit; it never displayed hello_world.txt to stdout) [marca@freebsd9-0 /usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils]$ sudo make install ... [marca@freebsd9-0 /usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils]$ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:::entry' -c '/usr/local/bin/gcat config.log' dtrace: description 'pid$target:::entry' matched 3823 probes dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME 0 43524 _rtld_bind:entry 0 43979 rlock_acquire:entry 0 43201 def_thread_set_flag:entry ^C $ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:cat:main:entry' -c '/bin/cat hello_world.txt' causes a kernel panic. According to the core.txt file, it was a "Fatal trap 10: trace trap while in kernel mode" and here's the KDB backtrace: KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0xffffffff8089025e at kdb_backtrace+0x5e #1 0xffffffff80858ce7 at panic+0x187 #2 0xffffffff80b4bf20 at trap_fatal+0x290 #3 0xffffffff80b4c540 at trap+0x180 #4 0xffffffff80b36963 at calltrap+0x8 #5 0xffffffff8162583d at dtrace_assfail+0x2d #6 0xffffffff8188aa2e at fasttrap_provider_free+0x1de #7 0xffffffff8188ad13 at fasttrap_pid_cleanup_cb+0x1c3 #8 0xffffffff8086dfa1 at softclock+0x3a1 #9 0xffffffff8082d724 at intr_event_execute_handlers+0x104 #10 0xffffffff8082eee4 at ithread_loop+0xa4 #11 0xffffffff8082a34f at fork_exit+0x11f #12 0xffffffff80b36e8e at fork_trampoline+0xe [marca@freebsd9-0 /usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils]$ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:gcat::entry' -c '/usr/local/bin/gcat config.log' (Another kernel panic) I can provide full crash dumps if necessary. Any idea what's going on here? Cheers, Marc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 07:11:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662F61065670 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:11:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msabramo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B1B8FC0A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc7 with SMTP id wc7so1650049obb.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:10:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of msabramo@gmail.com designates 10.182.155.68 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.182.155.68; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of msabramo@gmail.com designates 10.182.155.68 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=msabramo@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=msabramo@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.182.155.68]) by 10.182.155.68 with SMTP id vu4mr6239900obb.61.1330413059605 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:10:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=j9jLgPqBZPmFxYPIQrRk4qJqdhjhTa2UNFSB7lylohM=; b=E83g1dEV83+QEJDZ9tmJquR4HCpvL/L1mCJqBoBb1WUyc/94XM+/dVwzIL9RH/8o2z OG+B0HEpH5Sv4ntLBhxUqZthu83wco+ALQcIxgUt4MqNlubPVZS1Hxsu3xfgEnEgoZ4y qxKY/NBgLriE41Zw7lZXiCmil7Df1TiRcvIsA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.155.68 with SMTP id vu4mr5538870obb.61.1330413059517; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:10:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.24.7 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:10:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:10:59 -0800 Message-ID: From: Marc Abramowitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: DTrace userland X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:11:00 -0000 Another strange behavior: [Tab 1] $ /bin/sleep 300 & [1] 1806 [Tab 2] $ sudo dtrace -n 'pid1806:sleep::entry' $ echo $? 158 [Tab 1] [1]+ Killed: 9 /bin/sleep 300 Something seems very wrong that DTrace is killing processes and causing kernel panics. Marc On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Marc Abramowitz wrote: > I'm using FreeBSD 9.0 on amd64 in VMware Fusion and trying to DTrace > userland programs. I think I must be doing something wrong. > > I recompiled my kernel and world, following the instructions at > http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace and I've read > http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace/userland: > > The test.c pid provider example worked fine for me: > > $ sudo dtrace -s pid.d -c ./test > dtrace: script 'pid.d' matched 2 probes > dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m > CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME > 0 43030 main:entry > 0 43031 sleep:entry > 0 43031 sleep:entry > 0 43031 sleep:entry > > As does a simple probe of test.c specified with the -n option: > > [marca@freebsd9-0 ~]$ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:test:main:entry' -c > ./test > dtrace: description 'pid$target:test:main:entry' matched 1 probe > dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m > CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME > 0 43030 main:entry > > When I start trying to dtrace other programs, things don't go so well... > > $ sudo dtrace -n ":::entry" -c /usr/local/bin/python > Python 2.4.5 (#2, Dec 5 2011, 15:19:09) > [GCC 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]] on freebsd9 > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. > >>> import os > >>> os.getpid() > 1603 > >>> > dtrace: failed to control pid 1603: process exited with status 0 > > $ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:::entry' -c '/bin/cat hello_world.txt' > dtrace: description 'pid$target:::entry' matched 3315 probes > dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m > CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME > 0 43448 _rtld_bind:entry > 0 43903 rlock_acquire:entry > 0 43125 def_thread_set_flag:entry > (Had to hit Ctrl-C to exit; it never displayed hello_world.txt to stdout) > > [marca@freebsd9-0 /usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils]$ sudo make install > ... > [marca@freebsd9-0 /usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils]$ sudo dtrace -n > 'pid$target:::entry' -c '/usr/local/bin/gcat config.log' > dtrace: description 'pid$target:::entry' matched 3823 probes > dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m > CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME > 0 43524 _rtld_bind:entry > 0 43979 rlock_acquire:entry > 0 43201 def_thread_set_flag:entry > ^C > > $ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:cat:main:entry' -c '/bin/cat hello_world.txt' > causes a kernel panic. > According to the core.txt file, it was a "Fatal trap 10: trace trap while > in kernel mode" and here's the KDB backtrace: > > KDB: stack backtrace: > #0 0xffffffff8089025e at kdb_backtrace+0x5e > #1 0xffffffff80858ce7 at panic+0x187 > #2 0xffffffff80b4bf20 at trap_fatal+0x290 > #3 0xffffffff80b4c540 at trap+0x180 > #4 0xffffffff80b36963 at calltrap+0x8 > #5 0xffffffff8162583d at dtrace_assfail+0x2d > #6 0xffffffff8188aa2e at fasttrap_provider_free+0x1de > #7 0xffffffff8188ad13 at fasttrap_pid_cleanup_cb+0x1c3 > #8 0xffffffff8086dfa1 at softclock+0x3a1 > #9 0xffffffff8082d724 at intr_event_execute_handlers+0x104 > #10 0xffffffff8082eee4 at ithread_loop+0xa4 > #11 0xffffffff8082a34f at fork_exit+0x11f > #12 0xffffffff80b36e8e at fork_trampoline+0xe > > [marca@freebsd9-0 /usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils]$ sudo dtrace -n > 'pid$target:gcat::entry' -c '/usr/local/bin/gcat config.log' > (Another kernel panic) > > I can provide full crash dumps if necessary. > > Any idea what's going on here? > > Cheers, > Marc > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 07:35:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88F71065670 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:35:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hufeng1987@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B3B8FC1C for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:35:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaae16 with SMTP id e16so1807018iaa.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:35:41 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of hufeng1987@gmail.com designates 10.43.53.1 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.43.53.1; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of hufeng1987@gmail.com designates 10.43.53.1 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=hufeng1987@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=hufeng1987@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.43.53.1]) by 10.43.53.1 with SMTP id vo1mr20656447icb.2.1330414541278 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:35:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Pl9TZB3z3eAl2XTc17mHbFQjRDXSqvLD236QhwbPl9U=; b=MM21eSzZ7pUZXLaTBq6R/nv3hwnExktJV6QIDNtPq+NQ2YtsItPS3fwU9OiXmGFW5d d9v12aySkReOCPxAl8VxAdYKVYo+3hs5bT5zRf7B1C42VQBjg/Xv8LFQmSkSL63dK6Nv X7vLzwnBW8AVeyLpP710tBUDUCtwTjtT2pPQg= Received: by 10.43.53.1 with SMTP id vo1mr16789655icb.2.1330413104425; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:11:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([111.173.187.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ko6sm12369945igc.2.2012.02.27.23.11.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:11:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4C7E23.3050404@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:11:31 +0800 From: netroby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Delete files let FreeBSD crashes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:35:42 -0000 i installed freebsd 9 on virtualbox, when i try to delete a directory with following command: rm -rf ./zf2 the system will halt , then restart. i had using fsck -y to check the filesystem, but seems not work. following the output: ------------------------------------- bsd# cd /root/repos/ bsd# ls -l total 8 drwxr-xr-x 12 root wheel 1024 Feb 28 14:26 httpd drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Feb 28 14:53 zf2 bsd# fsck -y ** /dev/ada0p2 (NO WRITE) USE JOURNAL? no ** Skipping journal, falling through to full fsck SETTING DIRTY FLAG IN READ_ONLY MODE UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY ** Last Mounted on / ** Root file system ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=332256 (2688 should be 768) CORRECT? no 1393793 DUP I=332265 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY 1393794 DUP I=332265 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY 1402537 DUP I=332266 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY INTERNAL ERROR: dups with softupdates UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY ** Phase 1b - Rescan For More DUPS 1402537 DUP I=331641 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY 1393793 DUP I=332080 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY 1393794 DUP I=332080 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames DUP/BAD I=331641 OWNER=root MODE=100600 SIZE=3011 MTIME=Feb 28 14:59 2012 FILE=/root/.history UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY REMOVE? no DUP/BAD I=332080 OWNER=root MODE=100600 SIZE=9115 MTIME=Feb 28 14:58 2012 FILE=/root/.viminfo UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY REMOVE? no DIRECTORY CORRUPTED I=332254 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 DIR=? UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY SALVAGE? no MISSING '.' I=332254 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 DIR=? UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY FIX? no DIRECTORY CORRUPTED I=332277 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 DIR=? UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY SALVAGE? no MISSING '.' I=332277 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 DIR=? UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY FIX? no UNALLOCATED I=332089 OWNER=root MODE=0 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 14:51 2012 NAME=/root/repos/zf2/.git/objects/pack/tmp_pack_KboUfa UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY REMOVE? no SETTING DIRTY FLAG IN READ_ONLY MODE UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY SETTING DIRTY FLAG IN READ_ONLY MODE UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY DIRECTORY CORRUPTED I=332275 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 DIR=? UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY SALVAGE? no MISSING '.' I=332275 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 DIR=? UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY FIX? no DIRECTORY CORRUPTED I=426347 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 DIR=? UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY SALVAGE? no MISSING '.' I=426347 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 DIR=? UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY FIX? no BAD INODE NUMBER FOR '.' I=426361 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 DIR=? UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY FIX? no BAD TYPE VALUE I=426374 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=4289 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 FILE=?/pngtest UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY FIX? no BAD TYPE VALUE I=426375 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=11439 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 FILE=?/zlib UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY FIX? no BAD TYPE VALUE I=426376 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=5444 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 FILE=?/libpng UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY FIX? no UNALLOCATED I=439236 OWNER=root MODE=0 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 NAME=/root/repos/zf2/library/Zend/Feed/Writer/AbstractFeed.php UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY REMOVE? no UNALLOCATED I=439237 OWNER=root MODE=0 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 NAME=/root/repos/zf2/library/Zend/Feed/Writer/Deleted.php UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY REMOVE? no UNALLOCATED I=439238 OWNER=root MODE=0 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 NAME=/root/repos/zf2/library/Zend/Feed/Writer/Entry.php UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY REMOVE? no ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity UNREF DIR I=441064 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=1024 MTIME=Feb 28 14:51 2012 RECONNECT? no UNREF DIR I=441056 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:51 2012 RECONNECT? no UNREF DIR I=426361 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no UNREF DIR I=426347 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no UNREF DIR I=332275 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no UNREF DIR I=363375 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:51 2012 RECONNECT? no UNREF DIR I=332277 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no UNREF DIR I=332254 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no UNREF DIR I=332253 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts UNREF FILE I=194795 OWNER=operator MODE=100400 SIZE=2048 MTIME=Feb 28 13:11 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no LINK COUNT FILE I=194796 OWNER=smmsp MODE=100600 SIZE=50 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 COUNT 1 SHOULD BE 2 LINK COUNT INCREASING UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY ADJUST? no UNREF FILE I=194960 OWNER=root MODE=140666 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194961 OWNER=root MODE=100600 SIZE=3 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194962 OWNER=root MODE=100444 SIZE=194 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194964 OWNER=root MODE=100444 SIZE=67 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194965 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194966 OWNER=root MODE=100600 SIZE=3 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194967 OWNER=root MODE=140666 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194968 OWNER=root MODE=140600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194969 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=4297 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194970 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=3 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194971 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=3 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194972 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=5 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194973 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=5 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194974 OWNER=root MODE=100600 SIZE=79 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194975 OWNER=root MODE=100600 SIZE=4 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=237063 OWNER=mysql MODE=100660 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332251 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=41 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332252 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=41 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no LINK COUNT DIR I=332253 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 COUNT 3 SHOULD BE 1 ADJUST? no LINK COUNT DIR I=332254 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 COUNT 2 SHOULD BE 1 ADJUST? no UNREF FILE I=332255 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=160 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332256 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1320096 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332261 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=8064 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332263 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=31042 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332264 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=11324 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no BAD/DUP FILE I=332265 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=7433 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 CLEAR? no BAD/DUP FILE I=332266 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=3933 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332267 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=6963 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332268 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=8325 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332269 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=20357 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332270 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=16240 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332271 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=4023 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332272 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=16325 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332273 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=12003 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332274 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=2778 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no LINK COUNT DIR I=332275 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 COUNT 2 SHOULD BE 1 ADJUST? no UNREF FILE I=332276 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=2289 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no LINK COUNT DIR I=332277 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 COUNT 2 SHOULD BE 1 ADJUST? no UNREF FILE I=332278 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1206 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332279 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=41 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no LINK COUNT DIR I=364931 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=1536 MTIME=Feb 28 14:53 2012 COUNT 2 SHOULD BE 3 LINK COUNT INCREASING UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY ADJUST? no UNREF FILE I=426338 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426340 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=22425 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426341 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=5490 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426342 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=19780 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426343 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=48929 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426344 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=8829 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426345 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=4035 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426346 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1035 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no LINK COUNT DIR I=426347 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 COUNT 2 SHOULD BE 1 ADJUST? no UNREF FILE I=426348 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1135 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426349 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1380 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426350 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=2423 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426351 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1396 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426352 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1379 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426353 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=6075 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426354 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=3996 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426355 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=3853 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426356 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=4683 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426357 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=2365 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426358 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=2909 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426360 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1035 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no LINK COUNT DIR I=426361 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 COUNT 2 SHOULD BE 1 ADJUST? no UNREF FILE I=426362 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1176 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426363 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=2402 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426364 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=3070 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426365 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=3291 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426366 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=7431 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426367 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=3565 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426368 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=2203 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426369 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=4107 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426370 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=2929 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426371 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=2259 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426372 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1815 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426379 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=8754 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426380 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=4872 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426381 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1211 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426382 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=19119 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426383 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=7719 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426384 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=3919 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426385 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=18025 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426386 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1317 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426387 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=356 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no ZERO LENGTH DIR I=440682 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 14:51 2012 CLEAR? no LINK COUNT DIR I=441056 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:51 2012 COUNT 2 SHOULD BE 1 ADJUST? no LINK COUNT DIR I=441064 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=1024 MTIME=Feb 28 14:51 2012 COUNT 2 SHOULD BE 1 ADJUST? no ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups FREE BLK COUNT(S) WRONG IN SUPERBLK SALVAGE? no SUMMARY INFORMATION BAD SALVAGE? no BLK(S) MISSING IN BIT MAPS SALVAGE? no ALLOCATED FRAGS 1330765-1330767 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAGS 1330776-1330783 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAGS 1393496-1393497 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAGS 1394192-1394193 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAGS 1399669-1399670 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAGS 1400060-1400061 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAGS 1402541-1402542 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAGS 1403456-1403457 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAG 1468654 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAGS 1704976-1704983 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAGS 1707960-1707967 MARKED FREE 228938 files, 649913 used, 1766357 free (13333 frags, 219128 blocks, 0.5% fragmentation) bsd# ls -l total 8 drwxr-xr-x 12 root wheel 1024 Feb 28 14:26 httpd drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Feb 28 14:53 zf2 bsd# rm -rf zf2 rm: zf2/.git/objects/pack/tmp_pack_KboUfa: Bad file descriptor rm: zf2/.git/objects/pack: Directory not empty rm: zf2/.git/objects: Directory not empty rm: zf2/.git: Directory not empty ------------------------------------------------------------------- netroby From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 08:03:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DDC106566B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:03:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2008FC0A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:03:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds12 with SMTP id ds12so1624904wgb.31 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:03:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.101.72 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.101.72; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.101.72 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ml@my.gd Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.101.72]) by 10.180.101.72 with SMTP id fe8mr35805971wib.4.1330416228920 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:03:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.101.72 with SMTP id fe8mr28404331wib.4.1330416228855; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:03:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot.local (did75-17-88-165-130-96.fbx.proxad.net. [88.165.130.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k6sm12244588wiy.7.2012.02.28.00.03.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:03:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4C8A61.5010605@my.gd> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:03:45 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlUYnkjS7hqFLEsbU+G3DfN+oPC3toITbLyBbHGMFtoKA5xaDakspInMUKLGL++Sk9Ey3ae Subject: Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:03:51 -0000 On 2/28/12 1:52 AM, sw2wolf wrote: >> uname -a > FreeBSD mybsd.zsoft.com 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #3: Fri Sep 30 > 15:23:56 CST 2011 > root@mybsd.zsoft.com:/media/G/usr/obj/media/G/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386 > > I am using 8.2 for a long time. And it works VERY well. > > > Any suggestion is appreciated! > This is an entirely subjective question and one that only you can answer. For example, given the number of problem reports I'm seeing on the lists, I'm going to stick with the 8-STABLE branch for still a long time, likely until 9.1 or 9.2-RELEASE. You may want to reflect on the features you currently use and whether they've been improved in 9.0-RELEASE or not (eg ZFS v28) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 08:09:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93D4106566B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:09:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D188FC08 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so1850875wib.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:09:49 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.107.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.107.67; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.107.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ml@my.gd Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.107.67]) by 10.180.107.67 with SMTP id ha3mr35726807wib.8.1330416589216 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:09:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.107.67 with SMTP id ha3mr28260174wib.8.1330416589136; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:09:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot.local (did75-17-88-165-130-96.fbx.proxad.net. [88.165.130.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fl2sm67439096wib.4.2012.02.28.00.09.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:09:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4C8BCA.1080809@my.gd> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:09:46 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4C7E23.3050404@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4C7E23.3050404@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmeg/02UYQZg71RBuoQw6T73tSp6NiJgB4l+lHQi6NCI1waFuIhjaI964ASeS4uKRq4D7PK Subject: Re: Delete files let FreeBSD crashes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:09:50 -0000 On 2/28/12 8:11 AM, netroby wrote: > i installed freebsd 9 on virtualbox, when i try to delete a directory > with following command: > > rm -rf ./zf2 > > the system will halt , then restart. > > i had using fsck -y to check the filesystem, but seems not work. > > following the output: > *** HALT *** You're not running fsck on a MOUNTED device are you ? If you are, kindly stop doing so to prevent damage to your system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 08:45:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC878106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CDC8FC14 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1S8j3sq089772 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:45:04 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q1S8j3sq089772 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1330418704; bh=WLi6uRt28dzMoaekviz9H8Z4zYsC3hflsK+xd9D0b+w=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=HWASQNvBHgSF9khzo39sQ1ggkVZ5CQfPkImKa2WMNUK66bosRFzrNOEFuksxe+xao JJvXIqQdPTUJeTkrhIr6qIRXtF2IUvJO0o2irr8IErYP/u8D57p8mzrsFsY0ewde2M CzirNqOhu0Lgnv/gDlmAT75H08xRP50wr9O4LhBc= Message-ID: <4F4C9407.6090507@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:44:55 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4BFB09.9090002@weogeo.com> <4F4C094C.1010900@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4F4C3A3A.9080903@weogeo.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4C3A3A.9080903@weogeo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7D9A41A9B34CB51B4F6BAE31" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: "find" not traversing all directories on a single zfs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:45:09 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7D9A41A9B34CB51B4F6BAE31 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 28/02/2012 02:21, Robert Banfield wrote: > I have some additional information that I didnt see before actually > digging into the log file. It is quite interesting. There are 82,206 > subdirectories in one of the folders. Like this: >=20 > /zfs_mount/directoryA/token[1-82206]/various_tileset_files >=20 > When looking at the output of find, here is what I see: >=20 > Lines 1-9996943: The output of find, good as good can be > Lines 9996944-10062479: Subdirectory entries only, it traversed none o= f > them. >=20 > Notice 10062479-9996944+1 =3D 65536 =3D 2^16 >=20 > So, of the 82206 subdirectories, the first 82206-2^16 were traversed, > and the final 2^16 were not. The plot thickens... Now this is very interesting indeed. 80,000 subdirectories is quite a lot.. As is a grand total of more than 10,000,000 files. Hmmm... and you see the find problem just when searching within the structure under directoryA? I think you have found a bug, although whether it is in find(1), the filesystem or elsewhere is not clear. Given that 'ls -R' shows the same problem, the bug could be in fts(3). Still, that's a testable hypothesis. Let me see if I can reproduce the problem. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig7D9A41A9B34CB51B4F6BAE31 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9MlA4ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyTxQCglbQ/KZOOoBa9/XQghEFL0r6b 5ccAnjzQpBeylXIrtmSrk31Dt6p6I8gM =wyQF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7D9A41A9B34CB51B4F6BAE31-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 09:18:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C40F106566C for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:18:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153448FC0A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2JC2-0002Gz-7D for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:18:08 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2JBs-000564-0I for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:17:48 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1S9Hlqo052390 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:17:47 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q1S9Hltk052389 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:17:47 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:17:46 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: posix compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:18:11 -0000 I'm putting together a small presentation about FreeBSD for our IT support staff. Is fbsd POSIX compliant? Fully? Partially? The info here is a bit out of date: http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html Thanks -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 10:51:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B712106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B630C8FC18 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFC65C2B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:05:18 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2C635C22 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:05:17 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F4CB09B.7010806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:46:51 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: posix compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:51:51 -0000 On 02/28/12 19:17, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I'm putting together a small presentation > about FreeBSD for our IT support staff. > > Is fbsd POSIX compliant? Fully? Partially? > > The info here is a bit out of date: > > http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html Looking at the doc its not that out of date. Just check the 9.x column. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 11:03:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AC61065670 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D358FC0C for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2Kq3-0004IV-O1 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:23 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2Kq3-0003DK-Ka for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:23 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1SB3NfF056562 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:23 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q1SB3NR1056561 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:23 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:23 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120228110323.GA56536@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4F4CB09B.7010806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F4CB09B.7010806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: posix compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:25 -0000 On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:46:51PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > On 02/28/12 19:17, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >I'm putting together a small presentation > >about FreeBSD for our IT support staff. > > > >Is fbsd POSIX compliant? Fully? Partially? > > > >The info here is a bit out of date: > > > >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html > Looking at the doc its not that out of date. Just check the 9.x column. Oh.. I see. I only looked in the top table. Still, I don't get an idea from the table of how close FreeBSD is to full POSIX compliance. I guess that's the aim, isn't it? -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 11:25:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26F3106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6817F8FC12 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so1426673yhg.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:25:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.101.65.5 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.101.65.5; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.101.65.5 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jerry@seibercom.net Received: from mr.google.com ([10.101.65.5]) by 10.101.65.5 with SMTP id s5mr913610ank.79.1330428342739 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:25:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.65.5 with SMTP id s5mr656577ank.79.1330428342601; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:25:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p18sm46420376yhh.9.2012.02.28.03.25.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:25:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3TxyJL2QzYz2CG4D for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:25:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:25:37 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120228062537.31ac74c0@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120228110323.GA56536@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4F4CB09B.7010806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120228110323.GA56536@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlw9pBID8YkRQzgT9fSlP6DwiUGLOeh1ORWny3aEHJ03IJWGFwchWTACViUa9ealCNk8kQx Subject: Re: posix compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:25:43 -0000 On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:23 +0000 Anton Shterenlikht articulated: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:46:51PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > > On 02/28/12 19:17, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > >I'm putting together a small presentation > > >about FreeBSD for our IT support staff. > > > > > >Is fbsd POSIX compliant? Fully? Partially? > > > > > >The info here is a bit out of date: > > > > > >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html > > Looking at the doc its not that out of date. Just check the 9.x > > column. > > Oh.. I see. I only looked in the top table. > > Still, I don't get an idea from the table of > how close FreeBSD is to full POSIX compliance. > I guess that's the aim, isn't it? The answer is rather simple. In your presentation you would simple indicate that FreeBSD is not fully compliant. You then have the option of making copies of all the pages referenced in the above URL and including them in the presentation packet you are supplying to the group or simply referring them to the above URL. Figuring out which is more impressive I'll leave up to you. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 11:32:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7F6106566C for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FDD8FC13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2LHy-0007Bg-9L for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:32:14 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2LHy-0004km-49 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:32:14 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1SBWDgE056654 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:32:13 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q1SBWDgf056653 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:32:13 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:32:13 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120228113213.GA56638@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD References: <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4F4CB09B.7010806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120228110323.GA56536@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120228062537.31ac74c0@scorpio> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120228062537.31ac74c0@scorpio> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: posix compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: ,