From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 12 12:00:38 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA19977 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 12:00:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA19971 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 12:00:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from archie@whistle.com) Received: (from smap@localhost) by whistle.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id LAA02194; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 11:59:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from bubba.whistle.com(207.76.205.7) by whistle.com via smap (V1.3) id sma002188; Fri Dec 12 11:58:47 1997 Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.8.7/8.6.12) id LAA26187; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 11:58:47 -0800 (PST) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199712121958.LAA26187@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: (fwd) Re: F00F bug *fixed* in 2.0.x kernels In-Reply-To: <19971212122752.36696@right.PCS> from Jonathan Lemon at "Dec 12, 97 12:27:52 pm" To: jlemon@americantv.com (Jonathan Lemon) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 11:58:47 -0800 (PST) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jonathan Lemon writes: > On Dec 12, 1997 at 09:12:40AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) wrote: > > > > > > > >If they are indeed still using that fix, they are a sorry lot of > > > >incompetent idiots. > > > > > > The fix that Linus is refering to is one of several that were evaluated > > > and rejected. The fix that we finally adopted in FreeBSD is the one that > > > involves making the IDT to read-only and catching the write fault that > > > occurs. > > > > Good. > > > > And I think I should clarify my position a bit - people did obviously not > > find my statement about "sorry lot of incompetent idiots" to go over well > > in some circles. Strange ;) > > > > Anyway, first I'd like to point out the "if .. indeed" clause of that > > part, just in case somebody missed it. > > I don't think anyone missed it. However, the phrasing was same as the > question ``Have you stopped beating your wife yet?'' EG: it presupposes > circumstances that are not true. In this case, the assumption is that the > fix was actually used by FBSD in the first place. Oh come on everyone. No need to make a big deal out of it. Linus is a friendly guy and meant no harm. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com