From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Aug 25 5:24: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from europe.std.com (europe.std.com [199.172.62.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD05150E7 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 05:24:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cmascott@world.std.com) Received: from world.std.com (root@world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5]) by europe.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA13392 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 08:24:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from europa.local (root@world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5]) by world.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA24024 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 08:21:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from cmascott@localhost) by europa.local (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA00280 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 08:21:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from cmascott) Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 08:21:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Carl Mascott Message-Id: <199908251221.IAA00280@europa.local> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Is soft updates in 3.2-R still alpha? (REPOST) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is soft updates in FreeBSD 3.2-R still considered alpha? (That's what the README says, but the README is quite old.) Is it not yet recommended for general use? Thanks! P.S. Please e-mail me directly. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message