From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Mar 6 18:36:42 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6618037B401 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:36:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03.attbi.com [204.127.202.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC6C43FB1 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:36:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from 12-234-22-23.client.attbi.com ([12.234.22.23]) by sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03) with SMTP id <2003030702363900300aj0i3e>; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:36:39 +0000 Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:36:38 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton To: "Daniel M. Zimmerman" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.50_1 In-Reply-To: <2147483647.1046975218@[10.1.230.254]> Message-ID: <20030306183602.K73067@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz> References: <2147483647.1046975218@[10.1.230.254]> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm not sure "restored" is the right way to phrase this, but yes, this is a flaw in the port, and yes, it will be corrected. Doug On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Daniel M. Zimmerman wrote: > A note about this port - I installed the 2.50_1 port with portupgrade, > having previously installed the 2.44 port. I knew that there would be > differences in the default way it reported spam, so I changed my > "/usr/local/etc/mail/local.cf" (the local configuration file, which > contained some configuration options in addition to some custom rules I'd > written) in advance. Unfortunately, the new install wiped out that local > configuration file and replaced it with the "local.cf" in the SpamAssassin > distribution. > > Previous versions of the port didn't behave that way, and in general it has > been my experience that ports don't behave that way - if there's a local > configuration file, it's left alone, and the local configuration file from > the distribution is installed as (in this case) "local.cf-dist" or the > like. Can this behavior be restored for future versions of the SpamAssassin > port? > > Thanks... > > -Dan > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Daniel M. Zimmerman TFF Enterprises > M/S 256-80 - Caltech http://www.tffenterprises.com/ > Pasadena, California 91125 USA dmz@tffenterprises.com > > -- This .signature sanitized for your protection To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message