Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 15:59:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Cc: marcel@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/linux-devel - Imported sources Message-ID: <199907092259.PAA62745@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <199907092244.PAA30150@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> from Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami at "Jul 9, 1999 03:44:06 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > * Import of linux-devel; the replacement of linux_devel. The port is > * also made "alpha ready". The compiler installed is egcs. Not gcc. > * The old port (as is linux_lib) is going to be removed when all > * dependencies have been checked. > > Another repository copy candidate, imported without a copy. :< > Why is a repository copy mandated? If Marcel (or anyone for that matter) completely rewrites and re-organizes an (orphaned) port to make it more useful, then what purpose does a repo copy service. Saving history does not seem like a valid answer when the history does not belong to the new port. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907092259.PAA62745>