From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 14 11:22:50 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B662D1065679
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 May 2008 11:22:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702538FC15
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 May 2008 11:22:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JwF4J-0003iU-AG
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 May 2008 11:22:47 +0000
Received: from bkkb-gw.voop.net ([62.97.242.6])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 May 2008 11:22:47 +0000
Received: from solskogen by bkkb-gw.voop.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 May 2008 11:22:47 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: Christer Solskogen <solskogen@carebears.mine.nu>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 13:22:30 +0200
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <g0ei1m$r0a$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <g07lip$736$1@ger.gmane.org>	<6.0.0.22.2.20080511190114.0264af00@mail.computinginnovations.com>	<g09t4u$ads$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<g0a0aa$lip$1@ger.gmane.org>	<6.0.0.22.2.20080512153543.02665c88@mail.computinginnovations.com>	<g0aa89$q0p$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<6.0.0.22.2.20080512163401.026387f8@mail.computinginnovations.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: bkkb-gw.voop.net
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080512163401.026387f8@mail.computinginnovations.com>
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: arplookup 0.0.0.0 failed: host is not on local network
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 11:22:50 -0000

Derek Ragona wrote:

> Yes aliases should have a netmask of 255.255.255.255
> 
>

Still no go.
192.168.0.255 is showing up in "arp -a" and netstat -rn. (and the 
"arplookup 0.0.0.0 failed: host is not on local network" in 
/var/log/messages)

nfe0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
         options=18b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4>
         ether 00:18:f3:29:d8:15
         inet 192.168.0.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
         inet 192.168.0.4 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.0.4
         inet 192.168.0.5 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.0.5
         media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX <full-duplex,flag0,flag1>)
         status: active

Anything else that might explain this kind of behavior?

-- 
chs