From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 9 14:36:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C56937B401 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 14:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from h132-197-179-27.gte.com (h132-197-179-27.gte.com [132.197.179.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B9A43F3F for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 14:36:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ak03@gte.com) Received: from kanpc.gte.com (ak03@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h69LZSTO021258; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 17:35:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ak03@kanpc.gte.com) Received: (from ak03@localhost) by kanpc.gte.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h69LZSun021257; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 17:35:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 17:35:28 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev To: Julian Elischer Message-Id: <20030709173528.5db2dc02.ak03@gte.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Verizon Data Services X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.0claws25 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The upcoming GCC 3.3+ upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 21:36:03 -0000 On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 14:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Julian Elischer wrote: > > p.s. this does not mean that I do not appreciate the work you are > doing to keep our compiler up to date.. Keep up the good work. > Julian, there was nothing in your question that could possibly offend me. I do not take comments about GCC suckage personally. Yes, GCC 3.3 compilation speed is likely to suffer a bit compared to 3.2, although the change should be pretty minimal. There are examples where GCC 3.3 even beats 3.2 in compilation speed, but I would not keep much hope :) The GCC folks have started to take compilation speed seriously in 3.4 branch, we'll see if changed attitude will make a difference in their next major release. For now I am pretty happy that a newer compiler did not overflow boot2 block. This is nice compared with a stable trend demonstrated by _all_ previous releases. -- Alexander Kabaev