From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 4 14:18:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from scully.zoominternet.net (scully.zoominternet.net [63.67.120.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20A1937B50B for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 14:18:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmmiller@cvzoom.net) Received: (qmail 1607 invoked from network); 4 May 2001 21:16:53 -0000 Received: from acs-24-154-37-140.zoominternet.net (24.154.37.140) by scully.zoominternet.net with SMTP; 4 May 2001 21:16:53 -0000 Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 17:18:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Donn Miller X-X-Sender: To: Juha Saarinen Cc: Robert Hellwig , Rasputin , Subject: RE: Still having problems with the jdk12beta port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20010504171441.G39682-100000@acs-24-154-37-140.zoominternet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 5 May 2001, Juha Saarinen wrote: > Maybe you're better off using the linux-jdk13 port instead? I've built and > installed that on a number of FreeBSD 4.x systems, without problems. So, which are you better off installing? jdk12-beta is a native port, and gives much faster performance. linux-jdk13 seems more sluggish, and it lacks a JIT feature, AFAIK. OTOH, it has the newest Java features compared to jdk 1.2.2. Does the jdk12-beta port have a JIT feature? Are there enough features added in 1.3 to justify installing linux-jdk13 as opposed to jdk12-beta? Thanks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message