Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:36:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis <dl-freebsd@catspoiler.org> To: zipzippy@sonic.net Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)? Message-ID: <200207102036.g6AKakwr008407@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <20020710180409.GA2555@blarf.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10 Jul, Alex Zepeda wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 02:43:54AM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: > >> I haven't had any instability problems in a while on my UP box. > > Seems like the UP kernels are more unstable for me. Go figure. > >> > ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with "process lock" locked from ../../../kern/kern_exec.c:332 >> >> I haven't seen that one. If you can reproduce it, you might try setting >> the debug.witness_ddb sysctl to 1 and get a stack trace from ddb. > > This happened just before the box fell over (I'm now running a different > kernel.. SMP.. so far so good). What's the downside to sticking > debug.witness_ddb=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf? It'll drop into ddb every time you get a witness error and you'll have to tell ddb to continue. This could be a might annoying if you are getting errors ever ten seconds ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207102036.g6AKakwr008407>