Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:20:53 +0100 From: Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org> To: Yen-Ming Lee <leeym@leeym.com> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, perl@freebsd.org, lth@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: about PERL_DEPENDS and PERL_TEST_DEPENDS Message-ID: <20080311092053.GB53444@heechee.tobez.org> In-Reply-To: <759236930803082303s105615ffgea2b1f100b304d84@mail.gmail.com> References: <759236930803040921g2a8b0939se8a631123f1b4926@mail.gmail.com> <20080305170139.GB521@soaustin.net> <759236930803050928w2f45842fsbb6e74345e85f62b@mail.gmail.com> <759236930803082303s105615ffgea2b1f100b304d84@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 11:03:15PM -0800, Yen-Ming Lee wrote: > Since you mentioned that you plan to achieve the same goal about > PERL_DEPENDS and PERL_TEST_DEPENDS, what's your planed > implementation? Hopefully it will be less expensive. I cannot describe the planned implementation, since I did get enough tuits, but at any rate, I do not see why not maintain the database of only known dual-life modules (and not the whole corelist). \Anton. -- We're going for 'working' here. 'clean' is for people with skills... -- Flemming Jacobsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080311092053.GB53444>