Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 21:55:43 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r250426 - head/sys/contrib/octeon-sdk Message-ID: <7E5E7D8A-C8BB-4660-89C2-5ED38F16F484@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <CACVs6=-pLML57n8APGDGWVfG39KuO-Y1U6wJZzmb7gZZjZwX%2BQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201305100257.r4A2vkfd062811@svn.freebsd.org> <CACVs6=-pLML57n8APGDGWVfG39KuO-Y1U6wJZzmb7gZZjZwX%2BQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 9, 2013, at 9:26 PM, Juli Mallett wrote: > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> wrote: >> Log: >> Both my EBH5200 and GE WANIC 6354 have a RTC as well. It looks from >> the Linux tree that they always include this chip in their FDT, so >> make support for the ds1337 opt-out rather than opt-in. Now my = boards >> boot with the correct time. >=20 > What boards did you test on without RTCs to verify that it doesn't > cause hangs? The fact that there are two boards not enumerated which > did have an RTC doesn't say anything about the boards that truly > don't. Likewise, Linux's FDT is not authoritative for all boards. > I'd feel better knowing this at least won't have a negative effect on > boards without an RTC. I don't have any boards without an RTC, but I can try wiring the RTC to = a bugs address to see what happens. If that's an acceptable level of = testing, I'll do that. If not, I'll enumerate. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7E5E7D8A-C8BB-4660-89C2-5ED38F16F484>