Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:22:51 +0200
From:      Gary Jennejohn <gljennjohn@googlemail.com>
To:        Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: KDB_TRACE in GENERIC
Message-ID:  <20100619102251.6db25d41@ernst.jennejohn.org>
In-Reply-To: <4C1C7686.3050206@freebsd.org>
References:  <4C1C7686.3050206@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:49:26 +0300
Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote:

> 
> I propose to add the following options into GENERIC (perhaps only i386 and amd64):
> 
> options         KDB
> options         KDB_TRACE
> options         KDB_UNATTENDED
> options		SC_DISABLE_KDBKEY  # <- not sure about his one
> 
> This would increase kernel size only by a fraction, would not result in any POLA
> violations (KDB_UNATTENDED, SC_DISABLE_KDBKEY) and would provide a useful service.
> 
> Currently we get many panic reports that are almost impossible to analyze
> because there is no stack trace.  Especially this is true for panics at
> installation time, when people use GENERIC from release media and do not have
> ability to try a custom kernel.
> 
> What do you think?
> 

Seems like a good idea to me.

--
Gary Jennejohn (gj@)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100619102251.6db25d41>