Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 May 1996 05:12:24 +0100
From:      "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Alain FAUCONNET <af@biomath.jussieu.fr>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: BSD vs Linux 
Message-ID:  <13010.832824744@palmer.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 22 May 1996 12:38:46 BST." <199605221138.AA17317@iaka.biomath.jussieu.fr> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alain FAUCONNET wrote in message ID
<199605221138.AA17317@iaka.biomath.jussieu.fr>:
> * Availability of pre-compiled binaries and ports for non-commercial software:
> 			Linux +10, FreeBSD 0

One comment about this.

Linux is schitzophrenic (or however you spell it). It has a mixture of
Sys V and BSD in it, and that sometimes leads to porting
problems. Perhaps there are so many pre-compiled `.tgz' files for
linux as it's more difficult to port s/w to linux than to a BSD
derrivative? Quite a few of the ports that I've seen done (and are in
the ports collection) don't even need patching, they compile out of
the box, and without needing special ``FreeBSD'' ifdefs in the
Makefiles or source code...

It helps to have a heritage...

Gary
--
Gary Palmer                                          FreeBSD Core Team Member
FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13010.832824744>