Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 11:41:10 +0200 From: Atle <trollet@skynet.be> To: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ponderous 'make world' times post GCC 3.3... Message-ID: <3F3CAAB6.A603924B@skynet.be> References: <20030807062536.GA68747@dragon.nuxi.com> <p052106c7bb59ce43912c@[128.113.24.47]> <20030812213355.M22214@seekingfire.com> <20030813154823.GA99828@energistic.com> <20030813155523.GB99828@energistic.com> <20030813175634.P97608@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <001501c361b4$f84e6280$2bd90c42@officescape.net> <20030813141235.Z22214@seekingfire.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tillman wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 06:12:09PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: > > Well, you're the 2nd one who reports that nothing has changed. Several > > people however report, that they see the 3x increase. And I see it myself, > > no matter how often I look at this. Today I tried to build the vinum > > module: > > > > gcc-3.3.1 yesterday's kernel 132 + 85 + 20 > > gcc-3.2.2 yesterday's kernel 131 + 85 + 22 > > gcc-3.2.2 kernel from June 1st 52 + 27 + 7 > > > > Exactly the same config and the same world (except for gcc). > > > > This is an Ultra10. Perhaps it depends on the sparc model? > > Yours is an Ultra 10, right? Mine is an Ultra 5 ... both are IDE models, > I believe. Perhaps something along those lines? Same software, same machines, different results=can_not_be. Something has to be different. Options? Creator? Network? Is some perfipheral card sending spurious interrupts to a bogus handler, or an inefficient handler? Atle
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F3CAAB6.A603924B>