From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 20 18:10:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4473106566B for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:10:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo202.cox.net (eastrmfepo202.cox.net [68.230.241.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793138FC15 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmfepo202.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20110820180957.SUDA32466.eastrmfepo202.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 14:09:57 -0400 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.83.25]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id Ni9v1h00J0YnB6A02i9wey; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 14:09:57 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A02020A.4E4FF875.0037,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=L18tZtgXvCjggtrPsn7EqxywmDwdeqj6Yva+6kM3mdg= c=1 sm=1 a=9oMvUhOCfhYA:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=2vO5UZG1h46htWAnE/rx2g==:17 a=rJMi1K7IAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=f2fso8YPzgnR0qvGOVwA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=0qA3qW1cF2AA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=2vO5UZG1h46htWAnE/rx2g==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p7KI9se4060544 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:09:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:09:49 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110820130949.24174fbc@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20110819204833.3560b59c@davenulle.org> References: <20110818174341.65a0859b@cox.net> <20110819193027.7ed38af0@davenulle.org> <20110819204833.3560b59c@davenulle.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.5; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Enabling gjournal without destroying a filesystem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:10:00 -0000 On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:48:33 +0200 Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > > Anyway there was no other way to avoid a long fsck (until SU+Journal > in 9.0). Speaking of SU+J: I do happen to be running 9.0-BETA1, and am seeing output from fsck where it at first appears it's going to take advantage of journaling and then dismisses it due to an out-of-date journal (which is why I started investigating gjournal in the first place). Am I doing something wrong here? Can anyone recommend a fix? -- Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net