Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 11:04:50 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Cc: terry@lambert.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: On Holy Wars, and a Plea for Peace [sorry Danny, wherever you are, but the title fits]... Message-ID: <199704161804.LAA27657@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199704160329.VAA04560@rocky.mt.sri.com> from "Nate Williams" at Apr 15, 97 09:29:50 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > You can complain that the discussion is not resolving "the real issue", > > but the complaints do no good without some action to put in their stead; > > what implementable *process* do you propose? > > Pot, kettle, black. There is a difference between not proposing a process at all, and proposing one which is not accepted for non-techinical reasons. He has now proposed a process (which was all I was asking for in my cat belling posting). If this is a specific reference to my VFS arguments, I propose you integrate my patches. I will even send you updated copies against -current, if you can't figure out how to resolve any conflicts. If this is in reference to something else, name it, and I will propose a process for it. It will probably be a reiteration of something of mine you can already find by searching the list archives, but I'll do it. Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704161804.LAA27657>