From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 18 00:17:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72231065672 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:17:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5E18FC14 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:17:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so367189qwe.7 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:17:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hmSxzpzxiY70W3mUMkqgavzGguZyc7Olp5NcuknwgHc=; b=cRCioPi8Mjp4ZzHoD5Kb327LxSreKFl0MbQiTxN1AOdwnyO6e9TraWW4yCDSoHNtyd l95JgqfErB1K+PvTj5AkTv5tgpgrchkX18uRMkIEBqEXE7Mm/KtnVdIkQoM0UaZ7kKb6 II+R5c/HymN6CwE+Q/+zY7pTFFwilloNutcsU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=B7+k2/pb0oMHbI1MUNXNB1x/QYVK5Y43HLOzN+L3ze6dfI1ZRe2tO570RJYyCuUx5J 7xKmJdV4R164XiuavGUohyeqSBzLH0ArOK1bMpiE1P9BmCb9jnI40T/KT+y1YjjMJn04 SQMcnCtb4XdCUtsUUru9+jWgk48v45a83HcME= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.45.84 with SMTP id d20mr1051830vcf.90.1245284249634; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:17:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A393C21.8040800@gmx.com> References: <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793EFF4@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> <4A393C21.8040800@gmx.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:17:29 -0600 Message-ID: From: Tim Judd To: Nikos Vassiliadis Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gary Gatten , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, raulbecette@unp.edu.ar, wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl Subject: Re: Gateway load balance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:17:31 -0000 I've not yet had the luck with assigning more than one default gateway in BSD, compared to Windows and my crash course with Linux (which my opinion still stands as it was when I first used it). See my thread I started earlier.. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-May/199653.html The thread is broken because the replier wrote to me personally for clarification, after which he sent his answer to the list. I just recently tried the setfib way, and it still didn't work. Was getting errors but I can't recall them at the moment. So a firewall's "routing table" that's based on source/destination has to be redirected. I've seen the pf firewall do that. OpenBSD's FAQ on pf (the creator of pf) is very good, consult it if you have questions. http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf On 6/17/09, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > Gary Gatten wrote: >> I meant, the original source flows are nat'd to whatever outbound >> interface ip they are RRLB to. That way any internal flow can use any isp >> connection. Most of my interesting routing, NAT, etc I do with Ci$co so >> not all that up on BSD's options. > > Yes, works with ci$co, doesn't with FreeBSD ;) > > You cannot add more than one next hop for any given prefix. > Well, you can achieve almost the same result, but only with > the help of a packet filter which can bypass the routing table > lookup and forward to the next hop of preference. But that's > hardly the same with ECMP which many vendors support... > > Yet, that's about to change. There is ECMP support in 8.0:) > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >