From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 23:31:54 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id D753F16A41A; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: perforce@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FDF16A417 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:31:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gonzo@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC7C13C43E for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:31:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gonzo@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lBBNVrAJ026185 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:31:53 GMT (envelope-from gonzo@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from perforce@localhost) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id lBBNVr6X026180 for perforce@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:31:53 GMT (envelope-from gonzo@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:31:53 GMT Message-Id: <200712112331.lBBNVr6X026180@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: repoman.freebsd.org: perforce set sender to gonzo@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Oleksandr Tymoshenko To: Perforce Change Reviews Cc: Subject: PERFORCE change 130651 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:31:54 -0000 http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=130651 Change 130651 by gonzo@gonzo_jeeves on 2007/12/11 23:31:33 o Since gcc with -O does not bother to store ra on stack for breakpoint() use initial RA value from thread PCB. Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/mips2/src/sys/mips/mips/db_trace.c#6 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/mips2/src/sys/mips/mips/db_trace.c#6 (text+ko) ==== @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ #include #include -void db_stack_trace_cmd(db_expr_t pc_addr, db_expr_t sp, db_expr_t count); +void db_stack_trace_cmd(db_expr_t pc_addr, db_expr_t ra, db_expr_t sp, + db_expr_t count); void db_print_backtrace(void); struct db_variable db_regs[] = { @@ -112,7 +113,8 @@ * this implementation is good enough for practical use. */ void -db_stack_trace_cmd(db_expr_t pc_addr, db_expr_t sp_addr, db_expr_t count) +db_stack_trace_cmd(db_expr_t pc_addr, db_expr_t ra_addr, db_expr_t sp_addr, + db_expr_t count) { u_register_t sp, ra = 0, pc, i, stacksize, func; short ra_stack_pos = 0; @@ -123,7 +125,10 @@ sp = sp_addr; pc = pc_addr; + ra = ra_addr; + ra -= 2 * sizeof(insn); + for (;;) { func = 0; stacksize = 0; @@ -233,15 +238,15 @@ int db_trace_thread(struct thread *thr, int count) { - u_register_t pc; - u_register_t sp; + u_register_t pc, ra, sp; struct pcb *ctx; ctx = kdb_thr_ctx(thr); pc = ctx->pcb_regs[PCB_REG_PC]; sp = ctx->pcb_regs[PCB_REG_SP]; + ra = ctx->pcb_regs[PCB_REG_RA]; - db_stack_trace_cmd(pc, sp, -1); + db_stack_trace_cmd(pc, ra, sp, -1); return (0); }