From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 14:49:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B5016A4E9 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:49:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FDE43DBF for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:49:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 18340 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2006 14:49:41 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Sep 2006 14:49:41 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 9855B2842C; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:49:40 -0400 (EDT) To: Bob References: <200609280412.51064.bob@tania.servebbs.org> <451B8666.4030909@inode.at> <200609280432.54612.bob@tania.servebbs.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:49:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200609280432.54612.bob@tania.servebbs.org> (bob@tania.servebbs.org's message of "Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:32:53 -0400") Message-ID: <44slic6o6z.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PortUpgrade multiple packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:49:56 -0000 Bob writes: > On Thursday 28 September 2006 04:23, Armin Pirkovitsch wrote: > >> That might cause problems if the programs have the same dependencies >> (fetch conflict or even worse, build conflict) > > Likely they do; Mozilla, Seamonkey, Opera, and Firefox. (all flagged in my > security audit) Was hoping to do them all at once. > >> (smp etc is >> excluded from this assumption) > > Yeah, running SMP, so cpu is not a problem. But bumping into deps may very > well be. I have synched-up my ports tree, and have also done portupgrade -Fa > so all the sources, as well as any deps are already here. However, I fear > several packages may need the same dep, and all try to upgrade it at the same > time.... would make a mess! > > I don't think portupgrade is smart enough to detect multiple upgrades, at > least I have not seen any reference in the docs. > > Thanks! guess I will just so one a night, some of these are pretty BIG. You could look over the dependencies and figure out the conflicts by hand. One way to do that would be to use "portupgrade -n" on the different major packages, and compare the results. Or maybe sysutils/gpkgdep would be easier for you to figure out the overlaps from...