Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 17:59:08 -0500 (EST) From: Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net>, "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902281758160.406-100000@culverk.student.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: <31170.920242197@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> A legit concern, but also realize that all of us are talking about > 4.0 here - the new compiler would be an issue we'd have up to a full > year on before the product it's in goes mainstream. If that's not enough > time to work out the compiler issues after switching, I can't imagine > when we WILL have a better time to try and do this then. Progress > entails some pain, and if we're unwilling to suffer any at all then > progress ceases entirely. This is interesting, what makes egcs better than gcc? just a dumb question. I agree with Jordan though: no pain no gain. :-) Kenneth Culver To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9902281758160.406-100000>