Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 23:39:16 -0800 From: Jos Backus <josb@cncdsl.com> To: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DJBDNS vs. BIND Message-ID: <20010218233916.J28286@lizzy.bugworks.com> In-Reply-To: <3A90CA94.D7CBCB65@softweyr.com>; from wes@softweyr.com on Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 12:25:50AM -0700 References: <200102190547.WAA12829@usr05.primenet.com> <3A90CA94.D7CBCB65@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[This is rapidly turning into a bikeshed...]
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 12:25:50AM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> Some of the assumptions behind the operation of djbdns may not hold true
> for your installation.
Some of those behind BIND's operation may not either.
BIND's instability and problems are costing people and companies all over the
world real time and money.
> That, along with the unmaintainability of the software fails to convince me
> it is a viable replacement for BIND.
Again, what's there to maintain? Fix bugs/security problems?
-= * =-
I can't help getting the impression that people don't care to give djbdns a
proper look because of the way they perceive its author. Who cares what kind
of personality the author has, as long as the code works and is
well-supported?
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/
_/ _/ _/
_/ _/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/
josb@cncdsl.com _/_/ _/_/_/ use Std::Disclaimer;
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010218233916.J28286>