Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:10:53 -0800 From: Sean Chittenden <seanc@FreeBSD.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/sox Makefile ports/audio/sweep Makefile ports/audio/normalize Makefile ports/audio/mpg321 Makefile ports/audio/audacity Makefile ports/audio/terminatorx Makefile ports/audio/xmms-mad Makefile ports/audio/py-mad Makefile ... Message-ID: <20031209041053.GA59494@perrin.nxad.com> In-Reply-To: <86ad63emwi.wl@gray.plala.or.jp> References: <200312070127.hB71R7rA089150@repoman.freebsd.org> <86ekvgdt6n.wl@gray.plala.or.jp> <1070847025.84504.19.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <86d6b0dlnj.wl@gray.plala.or.jp> <1070864318.84504.21.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <86brqjergz.wl@gray.plala.or.jp> <1070866201.84504.40.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <86ad63emwi.wl@gray.plala.or.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > For the most part, you don't need to. All of the ports that used > > libmad by default got the bump. Not all users have mad installed, > > after all. However, if you use portupgrade, the old shared libs > > are preserved by default, so initially there shouldn't be a > > problem. > > Yes they will continue to work but this is not the point. I believe > any port which depends on different library should have different > PORTREVISION because they might work differently. For as trivial as the consequences of a portrevision bump are for as few ports as there are, could you bump this? mplayer autodetects mad and I couldn't get through a portupgrade -R mplayer until I manually updated mad. Statistically, I'm sure others less savvy have bumped into this. Thanks. -sc -- Sean Chittenden
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031209041053.GA59494>