Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 20:10:12 +0800 From: bycn82 <bycn82@gmail.com> To: Sato Kentney <satokentney@gmail.com> Cc: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>, FreeBSD Net <net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: dragonflybsd's ipfw Message-ID: <CAC%2BJH2wObtFAS87s0tdAadTmbG8SMU45m063PfDXRgOtCHQO1Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAD3kpuWvJWE83OJPoYASTCyeSoEb3Cnr1F7aLPzWFeHk=aq_SA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAD3kpuU8jQjMdfEiGNwYLToJDSZWGbJgQTzGeAFEw1UBLY4M3Q@mail.gmail.com> <20141117193354.T31139@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <CAD3kpuX8ruHA%2BnqGNp6vhLJdCpBv1M_G1OS%2BCROXU8te9kUF8w@mail.gmail.com> <CAC%2BJH2w4uATRBmmPifYdVcH5hSofmxZCbwzyG5r%2B7w%2BwfraM4Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD3kpuUJs%2B2cDqgUsSX=nWQgY29s70YV6fJXksjLn55uJFdceg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BhQ2%2Bh5AK-prq%2BimppWp4DcewzUMX5-PQ0kgZrobc5yHt48fg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD3kpuWvJWE83OJPoYASTCyeSoEb3Cnr1F7aLPzWFeHk=aq_SA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
*Hi Sato,* *I am also in this email list, If you have any question, You can ask,I just double checked whether I made mistake or not, and I only found "**To be honest, my rewrite version of ipfw2 is nothing special but it runs on this great system". So **please make me a joker in front of all these big bosses. * *Compare to the ipfw in FreeBSD, there are few differences. not a big deal.= * *1. modular* *2. lock-less* *3. old version* *Regards,* *Bycn82* On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Sato Kentney <satokentney@gmail.com> wrote= : > > hi > ok. i will test it. > but he said it is faster > > 2014-12-15 15:26 GMT+08:00 Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>: > > > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Sato Kentney <satokentney@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > hi, > > > his ipfw2 is ok for test now. > > > http://www.dragonflydigest.com/2014/12/11/15220.html > > > i meet some problem in testing so asking qesstion in drafonflybsd's > email > > > list. > > > and i want to know is it correct that the ipfw2 is faster than ipfw i= n > > > freebsd? it is what he said. > > > > i don't think he ever said that, and in any case the code seems to be > > taken straight from the 2002 freebsd version so i highly doubt there > > is any speed difference (let alone a measurable one with packets > > going through the kernel stack; to see an actual performance difference > > you'd need to run the code through netmap or some high speed framework) > > > > see http://code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/ > > > > cheers > > luigi > > > > > sure i will test it by myself. > > > thanks > > > > > > On 25 November 2014 at 09:17, bycn82 <bycn82@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> *that ipfw2 means "ipfw too", because it is originally from FreeBSD > and > > >> totally not new create things, IMHO* > > >> > > >> *BTW Sato, I think the in-kernel NAT is almost there, I tested the > basic > > >> NAT and it works in my lab environment.* > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Sato Kentney <satokentney@gmail.com= > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> i agree, > > >>> i am not good in english as networking administor from Tokyo. > > >>> but when i read the page, i see that the main idea is so call > "modular > > >>> design" and there is a long way to catch up the freebsd's ipfw > > >>> > > >>> anyway, i dont think it can compare to freebsd's ipfw, as Smith sai= d > > their > > >>> ipfw is the version without in-kernel NAT and tables .all these > > important > > >>> features > > >>> > > >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:48:13 +0800, Sato Kentney wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> > > I saw a email in dragonflybsd email list, someone is doing thi= s! > > >>> > > http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/ipfw2/ > > >>> > > > >>> > We've had 'ipfw2' for a very long while. I couldn't help wonderi= ng > > why > > >>> > DF wouldn't just import our many years of development and > experience > > >>> > rather than using bycn82's 'rewrite'? .. but DF already has ipfw2= : > > >>> > > > >>> > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/cgi/web-man?command=3Dipfw§ion= =3DANY > > >>> > > > >>> > man page dated October 2008. Before tables, in-kernel NAT, later > > >>> > dummynet updates and no doubt more. So why not start from there? > > >>> > > > >>> > cheers, Ian > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> =E3=81=82=E3=82=8A=E3=81=8C=E3=81=A8=E3=81=86 > > >>> =E4=BD=90=E8=97=A4=E6=9F=AF=E5=BE=B7 > > >>> Sato K. > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > > >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > =E3=81=82=E3=82=8A=E3=81=8C=E3=81=A8=E3=81=86 > > > =E4=BD=90=E8=97=A4=E6=9F=AF=E5=BE=B7 > > > Sato K. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " > > > > > > > > -- > > -----------------------------------------+-----------------------------= -- > > Prof. Luigi RIZZO, rizzo@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazion= e > > http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa > > TEL +39-050-2211611 . via Diotisalvi 2 > > Mobile +39-338-6809875 . 56122 PISA (Italy) > > -----------------------------------------+-----------------------------= -- > > > > > -- > =E3=81=82=E3=82=8A=E3=81=8C=E3=81=A8=E3=81=86 > =E4=BD=90=E8=97=A4=E6=9F=AF=E5=BE=B7 > Sato K. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAC%2BJH2wObtFAS87s0tdAadTmbG8SMU45m063PfDXRgOtCHQO1Q>