From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 12:07:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B634D6D4; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:07:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DCD629E3; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.31.9.192] (unknown [213.225.137.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA7C435C7; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:07:05 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <52135BDE.9070600@marino.st> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:06:54 +0200 From: John Marino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrej Zverev Subject: Re: svn commit: r325041 - head/japanese/eb References: <201308201148.r7KBmYcU083251@svn.freebsd.org> <521359E7.2020008@marino.st> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, "ports-committers@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:07:17 -0000 On 8/20/2013 14:02, Andrej Zverev wrote: > Well, patch from PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181205 > Not my decision at all. But if it is suspected to be incorrect, shouldn't it be challenged via the PR feedback mechanism rather than just committing it without question? It's also easily tested (remove gettext from list and turn off NLS option and see if it builds). I won't bet money on it, but this currently looks wrong to me. John