From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jun 11 13:22:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12233306CA for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:22:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [217.72.192.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49jPf70ww5z4c2c for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:22:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([94.222.24.162]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue106 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1MHFsE-1jexIL0wwy-00DFuh for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 15:22:05 +0200 Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 15:22:05 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd vs. netbsd Message-Id: <20200611152205.b305ae0c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20200611085616.0000514b@seibercom.net> References: <171506d5-19aa-359e-c21d-f07257c52ebd@freenetMail.de> <2393a1e0-b073-950a-78be-9f57d8e9934b@anatoli.ws> <20200610063555.00003707@seibercom.net> <82F57D0D-E0EC-49F7-824E-20A296C9F549@kicp.uchicago.edu> <250b853a-b436-0e99-b05c-9abd6b6019ef@panix.com> <20200611070630.2cb42786.freebsd@edvax.de> <20200611091449.383e1d83@archlinux> <53a6833e-db63-2395-4d2e-f05a9b1fb269@boxsci.com> <20200611112418.0bb0c896b685c84ed8d6a8f6@sohara.org> <20200611135639.0c07500e@archlinux> <36a71c5c-ccf0-d28d-c6c1-1d9c80873a12@yuripv.dev> <20200611085616.0000514b@seibercom.net> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:rYX+Nt05fqQJXbcF/jA9bCC9tBmqrZrowTB1FQcsqb2tz0PrZDd a9YhHw9TgqxiGGARoC2m4JPyUFWDV91tyOO2A8R1M34ezMVGyASab9nyyvXuJuAW+Sh5Z6E 7DbIAks/MomFoJkvhCKvLcWeElhSWUHiMqiD8mwZ84P1Wt5+UcEjdZtMaCjinyQ8EMS/lCF kNtU711JTNgTjwYCTQqrA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:T84ArZgpi+c=:spBozbr9iCLdadnsw6WpTY etqGr+sLEmMaiLrEHcyJzzEhvKie2btn2Lpd41z54zU8eNN5YgXS+YRSTvWUZe9gjUc9Zu+Ce q+lGoZdDxVtZiGt2hN4eP1OQNXXHy2mMW2moGSLk6iRUoQiJWmbdTrvrazgsh1+MwVFnRUP3b UfAWcMKcjNbVppW3z9Q4GXpamJ1zSzrMEuY//HJ+Fhx3PcPDV4T6jnjoQerZDpW2uvgo6Eu7r vxH2xXKxdB0aLgJI6cMlLx6nJszUwz3cJOepR7OV59SgljQJMUQZsUVUdmLE6iI7x2wJ4yh+1 0i6vZxSK3S/cPwaUgr0tR300k9U1fjIGznj+D8QloW+8lugmXUWUCe2X8MKbnc/t6aBaUgy2V tCbz7QRLZoFDFU0rBC9LPMM3y4bxIRiqOP6kPm1sREXPZcOp4eOtMuqSTFNLGFaoBbbc4jO1O 7Td36+9Tf7d46O9uOL6C9gSA6I9oe5m1JUeVXHB87dPYc8JkPvPaC2o2FziBGxV84GMl8pJdC jy5p1hPCbxpyXVlC+YNEcAiqXUy/5/sZ4XIboFW28bAVfbAPPiAXGoyVCkZNcCguLBkGZcsGp M9gRG4d3Czij8HFwMQguM3Im2ayDVIO8g/In+CqYh7nrsHx6nPrtTktnnHBCwQD3XSmuj7WNB rK3ES9ujDPRj/OTWNJEkZLP8U+PZpo0Fu/XAoDiluxaDhL4z6vGLSK5yWYB8AAXlfeTpm1qiZ TS0+UVyidq5doXMpl/Z9Dz1k79d6m8UC5IqtJ3hmTiZY9LLlWHYxA5ffqlposB10UQJ5y9Rje i2noidIc9Ltr2oekLp9SnHd1NBXPfcL0BPXlHltz8xPoWE4/c18JYQb1T6oXMBDdVTtPymI X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49jPf70ww5z4c2c X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:217.72.192.0/20, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:22:07 -0000 On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 08:56:16 -0400, Jerry wrote: > Even worse are the number of responders who fail to clip out unneeded > portions of the message. I am aware that there are users who consider > "truncating" parts of a message as blasphemy. However, without proper > pruning, an email replied to numerous times in a virtual cornucopia of > styles, becomes an unintelligent mess. Yes! This is a good description of what I meant with "showing respect" or "to deal with" the message. If your headers are kept working, and you can also use "[...]" or "[dd]" (or any other indication that you clipped something) the "quoted" aspect is still fully valid. And if you worry about the blasphemy: there's always the reference (!) to the original message which can be consulted. Thanks for mentioning this one - I thought I was the only one who noticed that. Oh, must be my PC's snob mode again... ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...