From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Apr 12 08:18:36 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA06938 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 08:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.116.240]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA06931 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 08:18:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de [137.226.31.2]) by Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (RBI-Z-5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA18244; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 17:18:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.5/8.6.9) id RAA19282; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 17:35:47 +0200 (MET DST) From: Christoph Kukulies Message-Id: <199704121535.RAA19282@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> Subject: FreeBSD pros (was Re: linux 128 MB limit) In-Reply-To: from Doug White at "Apr 11, 97 11:18:47 am" To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 17:35:45 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Reply-To: Christoph Kukulies X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > On Thu, 10 Apr 1997, Christoph Kukulies wrote: > > > Does the limitation of the linux kernel to 128 MB Ram still exist? > > Whoops, wrong list... You mean I should have asked in -hackers ? OK, anyone knowing - I'm seeking for further pros for FreeBSD - if there is an inherent 128 MB limitation in linux kernels? > > Doug White | University of Oregon > Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant > http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major > > -- Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de