Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 21:49:32 +0200 From: Oliver Heesakkers <freebsd@heesakkers.info> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PORTVERSION=1.0.0b Message-ID: <1927121.VcPVmuvqn1@pcoliver.heesakkers.info> In-Reply-To: <4FB94879.9080206@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FB8E67C.5030001@FreeBSD.org> <4275897.ij89MR5bXg@pcoliver.heesakkers.info> <4FB94879.9080206@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Op zo 20 mei 2012 15:39:37 schreef Michael Scheidell: > On 5/20/12 3:34 PM, Oliver Heesakkers wrote: > > I think you don't want 1.0.0.b, since the .b will signify a beta and > > 1.0.0> 1.0.0.b. That doesn't look like how upstream means it to be. > > better than 1.0.0b. > because, 1.0.1 will be > 1.0.0.b But at some point upstream could release 1.0.1a and 1.0.1b > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile > > -naming.html#AEN752 > not all that clear, is it? Agreed, hence the link to the PR where I describe some tests I did with PORTVERSION > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165767#reply6
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1927121.VcPVmuvqn1>