From owner-cvs-ports  Tue Jul  8 03:19:39 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA09386
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 03:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca11-02.ix.netcom.com [199.35.209.162])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA09322;
          Tue, 8 Jul 1997 03:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.6/8.6.9) id DAA06964; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 03:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 1997 03:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199707081018.DAA06964@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: peter@spinner.dialix.com.au
CC: peter@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org,
        cvs-ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199707080921.RAA00247@spinner.dialix.com.au> (message from Peter Wemm on Tue, 08 Jul 1997 17:21:56 +0800)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/exmh2 Makefile
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Yep, Satoshi, you can do this if you like..  You'll need to do it as root
 * though.  Hmm.. we already do a find for other ncvs permissions problems, we
 * could add this to the list.  Hmm... or even, tweak the post-commit stuff to

Yes, that sounds the right way.  However, that means *I* will have to
do all the stumbling, if there is some way to add a check to the
pre-commit stuff ("hey, you aren't supposed to have the x bit set, try 
again!"), it will be greatly appreciated. :)

 * do it...  But that won't help the imports, the post commit stuff isn't run
 * the same way for imports.  (I've gone on record before saying I'd slightly
 * prefer new ports to be done with 'cvs add' and have the modules, parent
 * Makefile etc all done in one commit message).

Really?  I would like commit messages look that way too (especially
since it's easier to check if the change to parent Makefile is
committed -- sometimes that doesn't come until a few hours later), but
I thought commits to more than one tree (in this case "CVSROOT" and
"ports") was discouraged due to commitlog duplication.

Satoshi