Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 18:31:13 -0500 From: Mark Kamichoff <prox@prolixium.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: 6-STABLE and IPv6/Quagga Message-ID: <20061223233113.GA3262@prolixium.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Greetings -=20 I'm curious.. how many folks out there actually use FreeBSD 6-STABLE as an IPv6 firewall, with dynamic routing? I only pose the question, because it seems there have been (and still are) a few fairly major bugs that affect this certain type of setup: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dkern/105966 [solved, probably a dup anyway] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dkern/104569 [?] When I say IPv6 firewall with dynamic routing, it usually means the following setup: * FreeBSD 6.x w/pf * Quagga w/ospf6d, possibly ospfd, too * Multiple gif/tun and Ethernet interfaces Granted, most of these bugs involve the Quagga routing daemons, but shouldn't cause OS panicks. I still have a couple boxes sticking with 5.4-RELEASE, because of these issues. It'd be nice to move them to 6.x. Thoughts? If the suggestion is to avoid Quagga, are there other recommended alternatives that implement OSPFv2/3? Happy Holidays :-) - Mark --=20 Mark Kamichoff prox@prolixium.com http://prolixium.com/ Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Class of 2004 --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFjbxB0TYC9KtF8BMRAizDAJsF/C1h0f4TS4LatZL14lLrLdhLowCgk96d 5fgQFJCJByPPANB5pUHukeI= =KK2R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061223233113.GA3262>