From owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 4 14:13:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA9316A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 14:13:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB5643FDD for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 14:13:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7]) (authenticated bits=0) hA4MCtt2066813 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Tue, 4 Nov 2003 23:12:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hA4MCr2q068039 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 4 Nov 2003 23:12:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hA4MCr2u073906; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 23:12:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hA4MCqDn073905; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 23:12:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 23:12:51 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20031104221251.GJ42463@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <20031101103955.GA42891@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20031104031740.GA67484@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20031104124826.GH42463@cicely12.cicely.de> <20031104175552.GA70699@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031104175552.GA70699@rot13.obsecurity.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.1-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: alpha@freebsd.org cc: ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: New alpha 5.x bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Alpha List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 22:13:02 -0000 On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 09:55:52AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:48:27PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > > I can't speak for this problem yet, because my test systems are a bit > > older, but speaking for the pipe corruption: > > I did a lots of bzip1, tar, scp, nfs(client) without noticing any > > sign of problem. > > What is so special with the port cluster? > > I have no clue about it's design. > > It does lots of parallel package builds (untar, pkg_add, compile, tar) and NFS copying. Any special NFS options? tcp, udp, v2, v3, IPv4, IPv6? Just to get the picture complete. The build is local and the package is then copied to a NFS server on which t has a corrupted CRC? Is the bzip2 CRC wrong, or the tar CRC (does tar have a CRC?), or both? Can you say how likely such a corruption is? Are other packages compiled during copying a package file to the server? Are the building machines memory stressed while creating the bz file or while copying it? Really - it's hard to believe that pipe itself is the problem. I do lots of buildworlds with CFLAGS=-pipe and a corruption would very likely stop building. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de