From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 12:34:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C507DAE for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C89F227D for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s6SCY8vI073148 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Jul 2014 06:34:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s6SCY8Km073106; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 06:34:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 06:34:08 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Jos Chrispijn Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 In-Reply-To: <53D61F49.7090507@webrz.net> Message-ID: References: <53D61F49.7090507@webrz.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 28 Jul 2014 06:34:08 -0600 (MDT) Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:34:11 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > Would it be a good idea to use BSD 10 Stable in a commercial > environment or should I sitck to BSD 9.3 Stable for two years? It depends on your usage. I consider -STABLE to be a bug-fixed version of -RELEASE, and have run it for years in various applications. The only problems in that time were occasional buildworld breakages, none of them affecting the running version. Netflix ran -STABLE on their systems, although I don't know if they still do. If -STABLE is a concern, you can install 10-STABLE now and update to 10.1-RELEASE after it comes out in a few months.