Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:35:08 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> Cc: Jens Schweikhardt <schweikh@schweikhardt.net>, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The PR db is not for -current problems, right? Message-ID: <20010618143508.I1713@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <20010618123205.I728@tao.org.uk>; from joe@tao.org.uk on Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:32:06PM %2B0100 References: <20010616180104.A19537@schweikhardt.net> <20010618123205.I728@tao.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:32:06PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 06:01:04PM +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote: > > > > Hello fellow PR drivers, > > > > just before I hit more people over the head that have submitted PRs > > against problems on -current: my understanding is that folks running > > -current know what they are doing, especially that they're living on the > > bleeding edge and that they must be subscribed to current@ where they > > shall discuss -current-related malfunctions. Right? If so, do you think > > it's a good idea to make this more explicit in the handbook? > > I disagree - it's important that people are able to raise problems > against -current; how else does someone report a bug against a driver, > for instance, that is in current, but not in stable. The PR system > isn't just for -stable. Mmm.. they mail -current, and if there's no reaction for a couple of days, they submit a PR stating that there was no reaction on -current? G'luck, Peter -- I am the meaning of this sentence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010618143508.I1713>