From owner-freebsd-i18n@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 23 05:09:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-i18n@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F06B16A4B3; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 05:09:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4DD43F85; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 05:09:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h8NC9eRA029969; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:09:40 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id h8NC9dkq029968; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:09:39 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:09:38 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov To: "R. Imura" Message-ID: <20030923120936.GA29844@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20030922170903.GA43754@ryu16.org> <20030923110416.GA16446@ryu16.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030923110416.GA16446@ryu16.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org cc: bp@freebsd.org cc: sobomax@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-i18n@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Patch] cd9660/msdosfs/ntfs/libiconv mutli-byte extention X-BeenThere: freebsd-i18n@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Internationalization Effort List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 12:09:43 -0000 On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 20:04:16 +0900, R. Imura wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:09:03AM +0900, R. Imura wrote: > > I made a patch for multi-byte character extension > > of three file systems with enhanced LIBICONV in the > > kernel. File systems are cd9660(joliet part), msdosfs, > > and ntfs. > > > > http://www.ryu16.org/FreeBSD/kiconv/kiconv-5_current-20030921.diff > > I should tell you one important thing that about 200 Japanese have > been using this patch and there aren't any problem reported yet. All you need at this stage is to find one committer who understand multibyte/asian stuff enough (it is not me) and can integrate this patches into kernel module. I personally don't think it belongs to port, but, rather KLD module, especially if it covers most of Unicode.