Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 12:40:43 +0600 (GMT) From: Pedro Giffuni <m230761@ingenieria.ingsala.unal.edu.co> To: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> Cc: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spice package? Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.961029123347.18800C-100000@ingenieria.ingsala.unal.edu.co> In-Reply-To: <199610291543.QAA05341@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 29 Oct 1996, J Wunsch wrote: > As Chuck Robey wrote: >=20 >=20 > Is there any point in a spice 2 port now that we've got spice 3? > Not really, I mistyped, Spice 2G6 was written on FORTRAN and someone ran=20 f2c on it, it has a value as the last release in fortran and has no=20 exporting restrictions.=20 3E2 had a BSD deamon for remote use... 3F4 has an X interface, and is being distributed directly by Berkeley. I=20 am reading the README to see if I find exporting restrictions. 3F5 is restricted, a comercial unexportable product, it=B4 supposed to use= =20 "high" technology. =20 > (I've only used the latter, but saw references how many of the things > that are there now must have been missing in spice 2.) >=20 > --=20 > cheers, J"org >=20 > joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-= RIPE > Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) >=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.3.91.961029123347.18800C-100000>