Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 17:29:26 +1000 (EST) From: jason andrade <jason@rtfmconsult.com> To: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> Cc: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD 5.1 Released! Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.50.0306101727060.619-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com> In-Reply-To: <7mllwah0ek.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> References: <200306091636.h59GavDW043030@freefall.freebsd.org> <20030609195142.U581@korben.in.tern> <20030610064507.GA22617@fit.vutbr.cz> <7mn0gqh10y.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> <20030610070407.GA27204@fit.vutbr.cz> <7mllwah0ek.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > I'm preparing sub-collection of all FreeBSD-archive. But I'm not sure > this naming scheme and separation strategy is good or not. I'd like > to hear others' opinions. > > I hope it may help to reduce periodical synchronization... looks good to me jun, but i would add another layer if you can.. e.g > collection > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ftp-all same as FreeBSD-archive > ftp-releases FreeBSD/releases/* ftp-releases-i386 ftp-releases-alpha > ftp-ports FreeBSD/ports/* ftp-ports-i386 ftp-ports-alpha ftp-ports-distfiles > ftp-branches FreeBSD/branches/* i still don't quite understand what use the branches tree gets and why it is mirrored out exactly.. just how in demand is it ? > ftp-development FreeBSD/development/* > ftp-snapshots FreeBSD/snapshots/* > ftp-CERT FreeBSD/CERT/* > ftp-other rest of above regards, -jason
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.50.0306101727060.619-100000>