From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 26 16:54:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from topaz.mdcc.cx (topaz.mdcc.cx [212.204.230.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8218737B405 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 16:54:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from k7.mavetju.org (topaz.mdcc.cx [212.204.230.141]) by topaz.mdcc.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9FE2B6B2 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 01:54:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by k7.mavetju.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B2CD63B1; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 11:53:29 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 11:53:29 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: port-lint run Message-ID: <20011227115329.A38024@k7.mavetju.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Greetings, After running portlint on the ports maintained by me, I wonder how people (and commiters) would response on a flood of PR's which would maximize the thumbs-up output of portlint for all ports. Mostly the patches will change rm in ${RM}, remove trailing spaces and so on. Commiting them will be a boring task, and the absence of the will of commiting them will not be good for the mood of the persons who put some time in it. So before I start my flood of PR's I ask you, should I do it or not? Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.MavEtJu.org edwin@mavetju.org | Interested in MUDs? Visit Fatal Dimensions: ------------------+ http://www.FatalDimensions.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message