Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Nov 1995 20:10:44 +0300 (MSK)
From:      =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su>
To:        "Heiko W.Rupp" <hwr@pilhuhn.de>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Total lookup under -CURRENT (me too)
Message-ID:  <MuKWWimyb6@ache.dialup.demos.ru>
In-Reply-To: <m0tHttC-0005KzC@pilhuhn.sub.org>; from "Heiko W.Rupp" at Tue, 21 Nov 95 15:41 MET
References:  <m0tHttC-0005KzC@pilhuhn.sub.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <m0tHttC-0005KzC@pilhuhn.sub.org> Heiko W.Rupp writes:

>Andrey Chernov:
>:|As I already say, all system processes which not access UFS continue
>:|to work, i.e. slip/telnet/kermit, etc.
>:|I suspect pure UFS code was damaged with new async addition.
>:|Kernel from Oct 1 works fine.

>Here I am not sure, as 2.1-stable has the same problems. If I recall
>right these appear even if ``async'' is not set. So if you say
>UFS-problems than these must be in 'normal' UFS code.

And I mean that even if async not set normal UFS code is damaged
by async changes.

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov        : And I rest so composedly,  /Now, in my bed,
ache@astral.msk.su       : That any beholder  /Might fancy me dead -
http://dt.demos.su/~ache : Might start at beholding me,  /Thinking me dead.
RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team :         E.A.Poe         From "For Annie" 1849



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?MuKWWimyb6>