From owner-freebsd-current Tue Nov 21 10:01:35 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id KAA10222 for current-outgoing; Tue, 21 Nov 1995 10:01:35 -0800 Received: from sequent.kiae.su (sequent.kiae.su [144.206.136.6]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA10217 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 1995 10:01:32 -0800 Received: by sequent.kiae.su id AA29184 (5.65.kiae-2 ); Tue, 21 Nov 1995 20:54:49 +0300 Received: by sequent.KIAE.su (UUMAIL/2.0); Tue, 21 Nov 95 20:54:46 +0300 Received: (from ache@localhost) by ache.dialup.demos.ru (8.6.12/8.6.12) id UAA01670; Tue, 21 Nov 1995 20:10:44 +0300 To: "Heiko W.Rupp" Cc: current@FreeBSD.org References: In-Reply-To: ; from "Heiko W.Rupp" at Tue, 21 Nov 95 15:41 MET Message-Id: Organization: Olahm Ha-Yetzirah Date: Tue, 21 Nov 1995 20:10:44 +0300 (MSK) X-Mailer: Mail/@ [v2.41 FreeBSD] From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) X-Class: Fast Subject: Re: Total lookup under -CURRENT (me too) Lines: 20 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 863 Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message Heiko W.Rupp writes: >Andrey Chernov: >:|As I already say, all system processes which not access UFS continue >:|to work, i.e. slip/telnet/kermit, etc. >:|I suspect pure UFS code was damaged with new async addition. >:|Kernel from Oct 1 works fine. >Here I am not sure, as 2.1-stable has the same problems. If I recall >right these appear even if ``async'' is not set. So if you say >UFS-problems than these must be in 'normal' UFS code. And I mean that even if async not set normal UFS code is damaged by async changes. -- Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed, ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead - http://dt.demos.su/~ache : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead. RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849