From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 28 11:16:55 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1387837B401 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:16:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net (ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net [68.14.63.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40ADE43F93 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:16:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from conrads@ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net) Received: from ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0SJIPvY004930; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 13:18:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net) Received: (from conrads@localhost) by ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h0SJIKSu004929; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 13:18:20 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.3 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <15926.54074.941041.75523@chlx255.ch.intel.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 13:18:20 -0600 (CST) Organization: A Rag-Tag Band of Drug-Crazed Hippies From: Conrad Sabatier To: John Reynolds~ Subject: Re: is our printf(1) behavior correct w.r.t \0 escapes? Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 28-Jan-2003 John Reynolds~ wrote: > > [ On Tuesday, January 28, Conrad Sabatier wrote: ] >> >> Unless it's already been done. :-) Can you check the RCS Id in >> /usr/src/usr.bin/printf/printf.c? Here's what I have: >> >> $FreeBSD: src/usr.bin/printf/printf.c,v 1.26 2002/09/04 23:29:05 dwmalone >> Exp $ >> >> Now, if we have identical versions, we have a bona fide mystery on our hands >> here. :-) >> > > Well, this is what I have: > > "$FreeBSD: src/usr.bin/printf/printf.c,v 1.12.6.6 2002/04/29 16:45:16 > jmallett > > according to the CVS repo, 1.26 has RELENG_5_0* tags as well as "HEAD" while > the latest on the RELENG_4 branch is still what I have--1.12.6.6. Ah, OK. So there *is* a difference. I can't imagine there being anything unsafe about using the 5.0 version under -stable. But it would be best to confirm this. Perhaps you should file a PR? -- Conrad Sabatier - "In Unix veritas" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message