From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 12 15:05:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D30106566C; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:05:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.ports@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C018FC0C; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:05:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.ports@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD677E837; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:05:50 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:05:49 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.2.4; i386; ; ) References: <4A31F4AB.5040504@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4A31F4AB.5040504@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906120705.49985.mel.flynn+fbsd.ports@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Philip M. Gollucci" , apache@freebsd.org, "portmgr@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: apr X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:05:52 -0000 On Thursday 11 June 2009 22:24:43 Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > All, > > I'd like to propose the following: > > devel/apr0 0.9.x > devel/apr1 1.x > devel/apr2 2.x (un-released, but soon) > > Then, I'd propose that any port that bundles apr have it 'removed' > and those ports depend on the apr ports. > > I.E > www/apache22 > www/apache20 > devel/subversion > > We get to eliminate WITH_APR_FROM_PORTS knob and WITH_APACHE2_APR. I certainly welcome this change as 99% of my installs already have WITH_APR_FROM_PORTS, however 2 things: - Instead of "(beware!)" one would probably want "(preferred!)" for the APR_FROM_PORTS knob real soon now, while these changes are in the queue. - It would help to have some documentation somewhere that lists what of the apr modules are required for what software, so that one can make the right decision for the apr port. For example, subversion wants threads and bdb, if you need DBD/postgresql support in apache, you need apr with postgresql (? I think) etc. -- Mel